Dear Sir,
I read with interest the research letter by Dogani et al. [1] on the improvement in arterial oxygenation in spontaneously breathing patients with severe COVID-19 infection requiring high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (80% O2 at 40 l/min) with the application of a simple oxygen mask but with no further O2 added. The resultant striking rise in SpO2 from 90 to 95% in eighteen patients was associated with a non-significant 0.15 kPa (1.1 mmHg) rise in PaCO2 and a non-significant fall in respiratory rate of 2 breath/min. The authors ascribe these changes to some degree of elimination of ambient air entrainment by the mask such that the effective FIO2 was higher. While no argument can be made against this interpretation as a contributor, it is unlikely that with an already very high inspiratory flow rate of 40 l/min that minimization of ambient air entrainment with respiratory rates in the 20s fully explains the improvement. Another possibility is re-inspiration of exhaled CO2. This would be consistent with the slight rise in PaCO2. Addition of inspired CO2 improves regional ventilation-perfusion matching and oxygenation with unchanged minute ventilation and tidal volume [2] by its several actions on pulmonary vascular resistance, airways resistance and parenchymal compliance [3]. Additionally, even the slight rise in PaCO2 stimulates ventilation by increasing tidal volume which will reduce VD/VT and dead space ventilation by decreasing the fraction of the inspired volume needed to clear the anatomic (conducting airways) dead space. Whatever the explanation(s) the finding, if verified in other studies, is clinically important. Adding a mask is easy to administer and in situations of oxygen scarcity, a simple means to reduce use of a limited resource.
Acknowledgements
None.
Authors' contributions
As sole author I wrote the entirety of this letter. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable to a letter to the editor in response to a published paper.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable to a letter to the editor in response to a published paper.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable to a letter to the editor in response to a published paper.
Consent for publication
As sole author I give my consent to publish this letter.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests in the subject matter of this letter.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Dogani B, Mansson F, Resman F, Hartman H, Tham J, Torisson G. The application of an oxygen mask without supplemental oxygen, improved oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 already treated with high-flow nasal cannula. Crit Care. 2021;25:319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03738-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Swenson ER, Robertson HT, Hlastala MP. Effects of inspired CO2 on V/Q-matching in normoxia, hypoxia and hyperoxia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:1563–1569. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.8004314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Swenson ER. Unappreciated role of CO2 in ventilation-perfusion matching. Anesthesiol. 2019;131:226–228. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable to a letter to the editor in response to a published paper.