Table 2.
Comparison of results achieved by ICHIOA, CHIOA and m-SCA in (Gupta and Deep, 2019) considering D = 30.
| Function | ICHIOA | CHIOA | m-SCA (Gupta and Deep, 2019) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | Mean | Std. | |
| F1 | 1.17E-11 | 1.59E-11 | 1.08E-05 | 1.04 E-05 | 5.70E-03 | 2.63E-02 |
| F2 | 7.04E-6 | 2.62E-5 | 8.83E-4 | 1.63E-3 | 9.11E-04 | 1.90E-03 |
| F3 | 3.56E-16 | 1.29E-15 | 7.97E + 02 | 10.47E + 00 | 8.48E + 02 | 5.49E + 02 |
| F4 | 7.58E-13 | 1.66E-12 | 9.03E-2 | 5.56E-2 | 7.07E-01 | 5.37E-01 |
| F5 | 1.96E + 01 | 2.01E + 01 | 27.45E + 00 | 3.24E + 00 | 29.5658 | 2.4320 |
| F6 | 6.83E-6 | 3.05E-6 | 1.30E-04 | 7.10E-05 | 1.24E + 00 | 5.12E-01 |
| F7 | 1.44E-08 | 7.37E-09 | 2.84E-5 | 1.36E-4 | 1.95E-02 | 6.87E-03 |
| F8 | −1.07E + 04 | 2.26E + 02 | −0.86E + 04 | 3.78E + 02 | −4265.8691 | 288.8681 |
| F9 | 2.95E + 01 | 9.61E + 00 | 3.46E + 01 | 3.90E + 01 | 7.81E + 01 | 5.21E + 01 |
| F10 | 2.01E-10 | 3.69E-10 | 2.91E-4 | 6.77E-04 | 3.36E-03 | 8.06E-03 |
| F11 | 2.48E-8 | 5.32E-8 | 1.02E-07 | 6.05E-08 | 3.84E-02 | 7.15E-02 |
| F12 | 2.83E-6 | 6.09E-7 | 1.22E-2 | 1.73E-2 | 1.45E-01 | 8.19E-02 |
| F13 | 3.66E-9 | 1.86E-8 | 5.81E-06 | 7.90E-06 | 1.41E + 00 | 3.94E-01 |