Table 3.
Comparison of scoring between cautions.
| Standard caution (N = 15) |
Modified caution (N = 15) |
Difference |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | U | z | p | r | |
| Full presentation (out of 8) | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–1 | 97.00 | −0.92 | .357 | −.17 |
| Understanding of elements (out of 8) | 3 | 0–4 | 2 | 1–4 | 112.00 | −0.21 | .983 | −.04 |
| Definitions (out of 8) | 2 | 0–3 | 3 | 2–5 | 80.50 | −1.36 | .173 | −.25 |
| Same/diff (out of 8) | 2 | 2–4 | 2 | 2–4 | 106.00 | −0.29 | .772 | −.05 |
| Total (out of 32) | 9 | 3–11 | 8 | 5–8 | 102.00 | −0.44 | .66 | −.08 |
| Self-reported understanding | N=15, 100% | N=15, 100% | ||||||
| Questioning of understanding | N = 1, 6.67% | N = 3, 20% | ||||||
Note: IQR = inter-quartile range; U = Mann–Whitney U; N = sample size.