Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Nov 1;115(5):953–955. [Article in Portuguese] doi: 10.36660/abc.20201086

Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics and results of the COAPT and MITRA-FR trials.

MITRA-FR COAPT
Total number of patients 304 614
Medical therapy Adjusted in the trial Optimized therapy
≥ moderate to severe (3+) iMR EROA > 20 mm2 and/or
RV > 30 mL
EROA > 30 mm2 and/or RV > 45 mL
LVESD, mm (LV size) Without limit < 70 upon inclusion
NYHA class > II, % 67.0 60.4
Hospital in previous years, % 100 57.1
EROA, mm2 31 ± 10 41 ± 15
Severe (EROA ≥ 40 mm2), % 16 41
iLVEDV, mL/m2 135 ± 35 101 ± 34
1-year mortality (IvsC), % 24.2 ± 22.4 19.1 vs 23.2 (p < 0.001)
1-year HF hospitalization (IvsC), % 48.7 ± 47.4 35.8 vs 67.9 (p < 0.001) Primary objective
Annual mortality/ HF hospitalization (IvsC), % 54.6 vs 51.3 (p = 0.53)
Primary objective
33.9 vs 46.5 (p < 0.001)

iMR: ischemic mitral regurgitation; EROA: effective regurgitant orifice area; RV: regurgitant volume; LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter; NYHA: New York Heart Association; iLVEDV: indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume; IvsC: Invasive vs Control; HF: heart failure.