Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;12:708309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708309

TABLE 9.

A comparison of the interaction effect between job characteristics and appraisals among two studies.

Hypotheses Hypothesized Relationships Study 1 Study 2
Direct effect H1: time urgency, role conflict and emotional demands will be positively related to burnout and negatively to engagement Yes 6/6 Yes 6/6
Demands* CA ON Engagement H2: the negative relation between demands and engagement is weaker when challenge appraisal is high Yes 3/3 No 0/3
Demands* CA ON Burnout H3: the positive relation between demands and burnout is weaker when challenge appraisal is high No 0/3 Partial 2/3
Demands* HA ON Engagement H4: the negative relation between demands and engagement is stronger when hindrance appraisal is high No 0/3 No 0/3
Demands* HA ON Burnout H5: the positive relation between demands and burnout is stronger when hindrance appraisal is high Partial 2/3 No 0/3
Direct effect H6: job resources will be positively related to work engagement and negatively to burnout Yes 8/8 Yes 8/8
Resources* CA ON Engagement H7: the positive relation between resources and engagement is stronger when challenge appraisal is high No 0/4 Yes 4/4
Resources* CA ON Burnout H8: the negative relation between resources and burnout is stronger when challenge appraisal is high No 0/4 Partial 1/4
Resources* HA ON Engagement H9: the positive relation between resources and engagement is weaker when hindrance appraisal is high Partial 3/4 No 0/4
Resources* HA ON Burnout H10: the negative relation between resources and burnout is weaker when hindrance appraisal is high Yes 4/4 No 0/4

CA, challenge appraisal; HA, hindrance appraisal; Demands include time urgency, role conflict, and emotional demands; Resources include autonomy, supervisor support, colleague support, and feedback.