TABLE 9.
A comparison of the interaction effect between job characteristics and appraisals among two studies.
| Hypotheses | Hypothesized Relationships | Study 1 | Study 2 |
| Direct effect | H1: time urgency, role conflict and emotional demands will be positively related to burnout and negatively to engagement | Yes 6/6 | Yes 6/6 |
| Demands* CA ON Engagement | H2: the negative relation between demands and engagement is weaker when challenge appraisal is high | Yes 3/3 | No 0/3 |
| Demands* CA ON Burnout | H3: the positive relation between demands and burnout is weaker when challenge appraisal is high | No 0/3 | Partial 2/3 |
| Demands* HA ON Engagement | H4: the negative relation between demands and engagement is stronger when hindrance appraisal is high | No 0/3 | No 0/3 |
| Demands* HA ON Burnout | H5: the positive relation between demands and burnout is stronger when hindrance appraisal is high | Partial 2/3 | No 0/3 |
| Direct effect | H6: job resources will be positively related to work engagement and negatively to burnout | Yes 8/8 | Yes 8/8 |
| Resources* CA ON Engagement | H7: the positive relation between resources and engagement is stronger when challenge appraisal is high | No 0/4 | Yes 4/4 |
| Resources* CA ON Burnout | H8: the negative relation between resources and burnout is stronger when challenge appraisal is high | No 0/4 | Partial 1/4 |
| Resources* HA ON Engagement | H9: the positive relation between resources and engagement is weaker when hindrance appraisal is high | Partial 3/4 | No 0/4 |
| Resources* HA ON Burnout | H10: the negative relation between resources and burnout is weaker when hindrance appraisal is high | Yes 4/4 | No 0/4 |
CA, challenge appraisal; HA, hindrance appraisal; Demands include time urgency, role conflict, and emotional demands; Resources include autonomy, supervisor support, colleague support, and feedback.