Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Immun. 2021 Jun 23;97:42–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.06.011

Table 5.

Statistical values for analyses performed within Figure 5. ATF3 localization datasets were analyzed using Ordinary Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc. Significance was set at p<0.05 for all datasets. Bolded values are statistically significant.

Dataset Main Effect Interactions Multiple Comparisons

F (DFn, DFd) p-value F (DFn, DFd) p-value Effect Groups p-value

ATF3 Localization Nav1.8+ Neurons Genotype: F (3, 24) = 55.51
Sex: F (1, 24) = 43.95
p<0.0001
p<0.0001
F (3, 24) = 10.03 p=0.0002 Genotype Males: Sham vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.4919
Males: Sham vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.3250
Males: WT vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.0031
Males: WT vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.0064
Males: Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs TLR4LoxTB p>0.9999
Females: Sham vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.1037
Females: Sham vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p<0.0001
Females: WT vs TLR4LoxTB p<0.0001
Females: WT vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.9360
Females: Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs TLR4LoxTB p<0.0001
Sex Male TLR4LoxTB vs Female TLR4LoxTB p=0.8948
Male TLR4LoxTB vs Female Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p<0.0001
Male Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs Female TLR4LoxTB p=0.9720
Male Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs Female Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p<0.0001

NF200+ Neurons Genotype: F (3, 23) = 17.49
Sex: F (1, 23) = 2.067
p<0.0001
p=0.1639
F (3,23) = 1.088 p=0.3741 Genotype Males: Sham vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.0035
Males: Sham vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.0402
Males: WT vs TLR4LoxTB p>0.9999
Males: WT vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.9166
Males: Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.9797
Females: Sham vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.0355
Females: Sham vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.0007
Females: WT vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.1901
Females: WT vs Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB p=0.9888
Females: Nav1.8TLR4LoxTB vs TLR4LoxTB p=0.5423