Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2020 Feb 8;137:105408. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105408

Table 11.

Associations between DIBP exposure (measured by MIBP) and motor effects.

Reference; study confidence; N Age at outcome measure Median maternal exposure Exposure IQR (or as specified) Motor overall effect estimate β(95% CI) Motor in boys β(95% CI) Motor in girls β(95% CI)
Téllez-Rojo et al. (2013); medium; 135 2‒3 yr 2 ng/mL (GM) NR 0.6 (−0.7, 1.8) 0.6 (−0.7,2.0) 0.4 (−1.7,2.4)
Doherty et al. (2017); medium; 258 1–3 yr 6 ng/mL 35 (95th) 0.1 (−1.3,1.6) 0.7 (−1.2,2.6) −0.7 (−2.9,1.6)
Whyatt et al. (2012); medium; 319
Balalian et al. (2019); 209
3 yr 8 ng/mL 4–16 −2.3 (−3.9, 0.7)* −2.2 (−4.6,0.2) −2.3 (−4.6, −0.1)*
11 yr NR −0.6 (−1.9,0.8) −1.4 (−2.5,−0.2)*
Polanska et al. (2014); medium; 150 2 yr 10 ng/mL 359 (95th) −0.6 (−1.3, 0.2) NR NR
Gascon et al. (2015); high; 367 1 yr 32 μg/g 22–48 −1.0 (−3.3,1.3)^ −0.8 (−3.9,2.4)^ −0.9 (−4.4,2.7)^
4 yr −2.0 (−4.1,0.1)^ −2.0 (−5.1,1.1)^ −1.8 (−4.6,1.0)^

One low confidence study (Kim et al., 2018) not shown in table because results were incompletely reported.

All studies used ln-transformed exposure and βs represent 1 ln-unit increase, except for Gascon, which used log2-transformation and β represent doubling of exposure.

Results that support an adverse association are shaded. This represents one or more of the following: p < 0.05, β ≥ 0.5, or exposure-response trend across categories of exposure. Light grey represents other supportive results. NR = not reported.

*

p < 0.05.

^

Upon request, author provided re-calculated results with ln-transformed exposure and β representing a ln-unit increase, to improve comparability with other studies.