Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;27(18):4403–4419. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15737

TABLE 2.

Summary of the linear mixed‐effect models

Tree‐level Best model Best model Best model
Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE)
Mild Resistance Recovery Resilience
Intercept −0.47 (0.15)* −0.41 (0.11)** −0.55 (0.13)**
Spfir 0.74 (0.10)*** 0.61 (0.10)*** 0.86 (0.10)***
NIratio_fir −0.07 (0.09)
NIratio fir × Spfir 0.21 (0.10)*
Rm2
0.127 0.102 0.170
Rc2
0.216 0.134 0.240
Severe Resistance Recovery Resilience
Intercept −0.72 (0.18)** 0.11 (0.17) −0.56 (0.11)***
Spfir 1.20 (0.12)*** −0.35 (0.14)* 0.88 (0.13)***
NIratio_fir −0.20 (0.10)* −0.27 (0.10)**
NIratio other −0.31 (0.11)** 0.45 (0.12)***
BAstand 0.03 (0.13) −0.16 (0.07)°
SPEI 0.15 (0.07)* 0.26 (0.08)*** 0.27 (0.06)***
NIratio fir × Spfir 0.30 (0.12)* 0.21 (0.13)
NIratio other × Spfir 0.32 (0.12)** −0.46 (0.14)***
BAstand × Spfir −0.29 (0.12)*
Rm2
0.349 0.172 0.250
Rc2
0.509 0.265 0.266

Fit of tree‐level resistance, recovery, and resilience (mild and severe events) as a function of different variables (best models). Sp = species (2 levels: fir, and the reference spruce); NIratio fir = ratio of competition intensity of fir to total intensity of competition; NIratio other = ratio of competition intensity of other species (mainly beech) to total intensity of competition; BAstand = residual stand basal area; SPEI = SPEI of July at the time scale of 5 months; x = interaction; Rm2 = marginal R‐squared (variance explained by the fixed factors); and Rc2 = conditional R‐squared (variance explained by the fixed and random factors). Significance levels: “***” 0.001, “**” 0.01, “*” 0.05, “°” 0.1. See Table S6 for the full models.