Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;129(9):719–728. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22435

TABLE 6.

MSRSGC Diagnostic Categories and Their Corresponding Risks of Malignancy in Previous Studies

Source No. No.a Risk of Malignancy, % Sensitivity Specificity
I II III IVa IVb V VI
Viswanathan 20185 627 373 6.7 7.1 38.9 5 34.2 92.9 92.3 79.0 98
Savant 20196 199 199 0 0 33 0.8 40.9 100 100
Dubucs 20197 328 216 34 0 0 3.1 45.5 68.8 100
Mazzola 20198 375 366 19 11.8 25 5.5 50 71.4 94.6
Wu 20199 1560 694 18.3 8.9 37.5 2.9 40.7 100 98.3 89 99
Song 201910 893 429 16.1 17.9 30.6 2.2 46.6 78.9 98.5
Choy 201911 376 376 14.5 26.7 29.3 2.7 19.1 87.5 100
Chen 201912 1020 349 8.6 15.4 36.8 2.6 32.3 71.4 100 70.4 99.2
Lee 201913 1384 421 10 17.5 29.5 0.5 17.1 83.3 100 76.5 99.1
Mazzola 202014 503 503 19.5 14.3 17.6 3.6 24.6 66.7 96.8
Total b 6889 3550 14.1 12.7 31.6 2.7 34.8 80 97.5
Current study 12,898 12,898 12.5 10.3 29 2.3 28.6 83 99.3 81.2 99.1
MSRSGC classification 25 10 20 <5 35 60 90

Abbreviation: MSRSGC, Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

a

Histopathologically correlated fine‐needle aspiration cytology.

b

Choy et al's study11 is not part of the total calculation because of the unavailability of their MSRSGC distribution rates.