Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 28;2013(12):CD006577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006577.pub3

Cadigan 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
2‐arm parallel group design
Participants Adult cardiac patients with either intravascular sheets or an intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) in place.
Total N randomized: 140
N randomized to music group: 75
N randomized to control group: 65
N analyzed in music group: 75
N analyzed in control group: 65
Sex: 40 (29%) women, 100 (71%) men
Mean age: 62.25 (SD 12.7) years
Ethnicity: not reported
Setting: Inpatient
Country: USA
Interventions Two study groups:
1. Music group: listening to researcher‐selected music through headphones
2. Control group: standard care
Music provided: a mixture of symphonic music and nature sounds
Number of sessions: 1
Length of session: 30 min
Categorized as music medicine
Outcomes Psychological distress (POMS‐Short Form): posttest scores
HR, SBP, DBP: posttest scores
Pain (VAS): posttest scores
Peripheral skin temperature:posttest scores
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients were randomized to either the treatment or control group by means of a table of random numbers."(p.8)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Blinding of participants were not possible. Personnel were not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes High risk Self report measures were used for subjective outcomes.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Unclear risk It is unclear whether outcome assessors were blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Attrition rate: n = 10 (7%). Data on all randomized participants were obtained for physiological data but there was a loss of 10 subjects for the POMS data. No reason was reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not sufficient information available to make judgment
Other bias Low risk Supported by Eta Tau Chapter at Salem State College and Alpha Chi Chapter of Sigma Theta Tau International