Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 28;2013(12):CD006577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006577.pub3

Schou 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
2‐arm parallel group design
Participants Adults, valve replacement or valve replacement and CABG
Total N randomized: 68
N randomized to music therapy group:25
N randomized to placebo group: 23 (not used in this review)
N randomized to control group: 20
N analyzed in music therapy group: 22
N analyzed in control group: 19
N randomized in placebo group: 22
Mean age: 65 (SD 9.5) years
Sex: 14 (21%) women, 54 (79%) men
Ethnicity: not reported
Setting: inpatient
Country: Denmark
Interventions Two study groups:
1. Music therapy group: music‐guided relaxation
2. Control group: standard care
Music provided: (a) Easy listening, (b) classical, (c) specially composed (musicure), (d) jazz
Number of sessions: 1 pre‐operative session and up to 4 postoperative sessions (most participants received 2 postop sessions)
Duration of session: 35 mins
Categorized as music therapy
Outcomes Anxiety (VAS): posttest 2nd postop session
Mood (POMS): posttest 2nd postop session
Pain (VAS): posttest 2nd postop session
Use of strong opioids (mg): on day of 2nd session
Use of mild opioids (mg): on day of 2nd session
Use of paracetamol (gram): on day of 2nd session
Length of hospital stay
Notes Most participants only received 2 sessions postoperatively. Therefore, data of the 2nd postop sessions was used for this analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random block
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Use of codes as group labels, recruiters did not know what group the codes identified (personal communication with author)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Music therapist and participants could not be blinded given the interactive nature of the music therapy session
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Self report measures were used for subjective outcomes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Attrition: n = 4 (8.8%). Withdrawals due to early discharge.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not sufficient information available to make judgment
Other bias Low risk Unfunded research study