Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;11:744250. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744250

Table 2.

Top 15 features for HPV status prediction and notation of involvement in HPV status-specific prognostic prediction in experiment 2.

Feature names (parameters) ROI Rank sum p-value (unadjusted) Contribute to DFS prediction for HPV+? Contribute to DFS prediction for HPV−?
CoLlAGe (Std of sum-variance) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 3.0 × 10−7
Haralick (mean of Info1) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 1.3 × 10−8
Gabor (median, λ = 3, θ = 0.1 rad) Peritumoral 5–10 mm 8.5 × 10−6
CoLlAGe (skewness of sum-average) Peritumoral 5–10 mm 0.0046
CoLlAGe (kurtosis of diff-average) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 1.78 × 10−4
Haralick (Std of Info1) Peritumoral 5–10 mm 4.7 × 10−4
Gabor (skewness, λ = 5, θ = 0.0 rad) Peritumoral 10–15 mm 0.001
Laws (median of E5L5) Peritumoral 10–15 mm 0.0335
Laws (skewness L5R5) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 6.5 × 10−4
Gabor (kurtosis, λ = 3, θ = 0.6 rad) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 4.8 × 10−6
CoLlAGe (Std of sum-average) Peritumoral 0–5 mm 5.3 × 10−5
Haralick (median of info1) Intratumoral 1.8 × 10−5
CoLlAGe (skewness of diff-variance) Intratumoral 4.4 × 10−4
Gray (median of mean intensity) Intratumoral 0.001
Haralick (skewness of diff-variance) Intratumoral 0.005