Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;14:5665–5673. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S328010

Table 6.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of the ADNEX Model for Different Subtypes of Ovarian Tumors

ADNEX Models Sensitivity (95% CI) (%) Specificity (95% CI)(%) PPV (95% CI) (%) NPV (95% CI) (%) Diagnose Accordance Rate (95% CI) (%)
Benign tumor 74.0(65.1–81.6) 94.3(88.0–97.9) 93.6(87.0–97.0) 76.2(70.2–81.3) 83.5(78.0–88.1)
Borderline tumor 60.0(36.1–80.9) 84.8(79.1–89.4) 27.9(19.3–38.6) 95.6(92.6–97.4) 82.6(77.0–87.3)
Stage I 28.6(8.4–58.1) 96.7(93.3–98.7) 36.4(15.9–63.3) 95.3(93.6–96.6) 92.4(88.1–95.5)
Stage II–IV 85.0(73.4–92.9) 90.9(85.4–94.8) 77.3(67.5–84.8) 94.3(90.0–96.8) 89.3(84.5–93.0)
Metastatic tumor 45.5(16.7–76.6) 97.7(94.6–99.2) 50.0(25.3–74.7) 97.2(95.3–98.3) 95.1(91.4–97.5)

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.