Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 21;18(9):e1003754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003754

Table 3. Estimated effects of intervention compared with control on primary and secondary outcomes, with continuous outcomes.

Raw data, mean (SD) Effects based on primary model*
Control Intervention Difference (95% CI) P value
HbA1c (%)
    Baseline 7.83 (1.91) 7.89 (1.93) - -
    EOS 7.82 (1.93) 7.55 (1.79) - -
    Change −0.01 (1.78) −0.33 (1.75) −0.30 (−0.38, −0.21) <0.001
FBG (mmol/L)
    Baseline 8.57 (3.38) 8.71 (3.49) -
    EOS 8.50 (3.51) 8.08 (3.14) -
    Change −0.06 (3.44) −0.63 (3.49) −0.47 (−0.62, −0.32) <0.001
SBP (mm Hg)
    Baseline 137.1 (21.2) 136.9 (20.8) - -
    EOS 135.6 (20.1) 134.4 (19.7) - -
    Change −1.6 (19.4) −2.4 (19.3) −1.0 (−2.0, 0.0) 0.052
DBP (mm Hg)
    Baseline 79.7 (12.2) 79.8 (12.1) - -
    EOS 79.3 (11.6) 78.7 (11.3) - -
    Change −0.4 (11.1) −1.0 (11.1) −0.6 (−1.1, −0.1) 0.032
LDL-C (mmol/L)
    Baseline 2.83 (0.91) 2.84 (0.91) - -
    EOS 2.74 (0.88) 2.74 (0.88) - -
    Change −0.09 (0.83) −0.10 (0.84) −0.01 (−0.06, 0.04) 0.808
Weight (kg)
    Baseline 64.8 (11.4) 64.9 (11.3) - -
    EOS 64.5 (11.5) 64.6 (11.2) - -
    Change −0.2 (4.5) −0.2 (4.3) 0.0 (−0.2, 0.2) 0.916

* Primary model: linear regression with GEE accounting for clustering and with adjustment of baseline value of the analyzed outcome.

CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; EOS, end of study; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GEE, generalized estimating equation; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.