Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Urban Stud. 2015 Jun 25;53(12):2624–2636. doi: 10.1177/0042098015592822

Table 3.

Logistic regression of characteristics associated with visiting the park and usually exercises, by individual and park characteristics

Visits the park, usually exercises in the park
N = 2416
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Gender
 Male*
 Female 0.95
(0.75, 1.20)
Age Group
 18 to24 0.93
(0.67, 1.29)
 25 to 46*
 47+ 1.12
(0.86, 1.44)
Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White
 Hispanic 1.17
(0.82, 1.67)
 African American 1.62++
(1.20, 2.20)
 Other 0.94
(0.58, 1.52)
BMI
 Normal or Below 1.21
(0.95, 1.53)
 Overweight/Obese *
Perceived Health
 Excellent 1.42+
(1.06, 1.91)
 Very Good*
 Good 1.03
(0.78, 1.36)
 Fair/Poor 1.33
(0.88, 1.99)
Residence Distance from Park
 ≤ 0.25 mi*
 0.26 to 0.50 mi 0.80+
(0.64, 1.00)
Perceived Park Safety
 Very Safe/Safe 1.82+
(1.13, 2.93)
 Not Safe/Not Safe at All*
City
 Albuquerque, NM 1.41
(0.88, 2.25)
 Chapel Hill, NC 0.46+++
(0.30, 0.71)
 Columbus, OH 0.95
(0.64, 1.41)
 Philadelphia, PA*
Facilities
 3 or fewer 0.65
(0.41, 1.03)
 4 or 5 1.19
(0.83, 1.69)
 More than 5*
Indoor recreation area 1.12
(0.84, 1.50)
Organized Activities Observed 1.01
(1.00, 1.02)
Model Statistics:
Wald chi-square 75.25
p < .0001
Concordance Statistic 0.64
*

Reference group

+

p < .05

++

p < .01

+++

p < 0.001