TABLE 4.
Summary Results of the Linear Mixed-Effects Models for the Recognition and Meaning Accuracy Data
| Measure | Fixed effect | β | Standard error | z | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition | |||||
| Immediate test (hit rate) | Target word type | 1.15 | 0.07 | 16.46 | <.0001 |
| Context consistency | −0.01 | 0.18 | −0.05 | .957 | |
| Interaction: Target Word Type × Context Consistency | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.32 | .748 | |
| Delayed test (hit rate) | Target word type | 0.91 | 0.06 | 13.91 | <.0001 |
| Context consistency | −0.02 | 0.18 | −0.14 | .887 | |
| Interaction: Target Word Type × Context Consistency | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.80 | .418 | |
| Meaning accuracy | |||||
| Immediate test: Based on meaning from session 1 (inconsistent context) | Target word type | 0.13 | 0.06 | 2.40 | .016 |
| Immediate test: Based on meaning from session 2 (inconsistent context) | Target word type | −0.02 | 0.06 | −0.27 | .784 |
| Immediate test: Based on meaning from either session (consistent context) | Target word type | 0.12 | 0.06 | 2.14 | .032 |
| Delayed test: Based on meaning from session 1 (inconsistent context) | Target word type | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.33 | .735 |
| Delayed test: Based on meaning from session 2 (inconsistent context) | Target word type | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.20 | .840 |
| Delayed test: Based on meaning from either session (consistent context) | Target word type | 0.002 | 440.32 | 0.00 | 1 |
Note. For recognition results, the fixed effect of target word type referred to the four possible conditions for each of the novel targets shown: whether the novel target had not appeared at all during the two self-paced reading sessions, whether it had appeared in just the first or second session, or whether it had appeared in both sessions. For the meaning accuracy results, the context consistency conditions are parsed out in this table due to the fact that accuracy meant something different in each of the different context conditions.