Table 1:
Modeling tool | Strengths | Limitations if used by itself | Polio-related policy questions addressed by use of the given tool by itself |
---|---|---|---|
Systems thinking | * Identify and communicate dynamic complexity * Maintain system perspective |
* Qualitative | * What does the global polio surveillance system look like, what are the key delays and outputs (Kalkowska et al. 2015b)? |
Deterministic DEB modeling | * Account for aggregate-level feedbacks, accumulation, and delays * Ability to focus on and systematically identify critical dynamic complexity * Highly extendable with complimentary approaches |
* Steady-state errors * Stocks never reach 0 * Potentially unrealistic distributions implied by delay processes or aging chains * Only captures average- behavior (i.e., ignores randomness in transitions, uncertainty about averages for stocks, and variability around these averages) |
* What can we learn for the future from dynamic modeling of past polio experiences (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2005; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2013c)? * What are the trade-offs between speed and coverage of outbreak response immunization (Thompson et al. 2006a)? * What are key polio under-vaccinated subpopulations in the United States, what are the trends, and what are the implications for the national polio vaccine stockpile (Thompson et al. 2012)? * What are the impacts of various immunization options on poliovirus transmission and population immunity to poliovirus transmission in various settings of interest (Thompson et al. 2012; Kalkowska et al. 2014b; Kalkowska et al. 2014a; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2015c; Kalkowska et al. 2015a; Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2015a; Thompson et al. 2015b; Duintjer Tebbens and Thompson 2017b; Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2017b)? * How does expanding the target age groups of immunization campaigns affect polio incidence and population immunity to transmission (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2014)? * What are the best strategies to manage various risks associated with the implementation of OPV cessation (Duintjer Tebbens and Thompson 2014; Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2014a; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2016b; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2016a; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2016c)? |
Stochastic DEB modeling | * Account for feedbacks, accumulation, delays, and stochastic variability in transitions between stocks | * Computationally more intensive and less tractable than deterministic DEB models * Still subject to steady-state errors and unrealistic distributions implied by delay processes |
* How do different decision rules perform to prioritize resources for multiple eradicable diseases (Duintjer Tebbens and Thompson 2009)? * What is the probability of undetected poliovirus circulation as a function of time since the last detection (Kalkowska et al. 2012; Kalkowska et al. 2015b)? |
DES modeling | * Accounts for feedback, accumulation, delays, and stochastic variability in transitions between stocks based on individual-level variability | * Computationally more intensive and less tractable than DEB models * Less easy to identify feedback structure |
* What is the expected prevalence of iVDPV excretors after OPV cessation and how does this depend on iVDPV surveillance and polio antiviral drug properties (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2015b)? |
Agent-based modeling | * Accounts for feedbacks, accumulation, delays, stochastic variability in transitions between stocks, and individual-level variability, interactions, and decisions | * Computationally highly intensive * Systems perspective sometimes not explicit * Depends on adequate detailed-level data * Not easily amenable to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis |
* How do assumptions about contact networks affect modeled poliovirus outbreaks (Rahmandad et al. 2011)? * How might a wild poliovirus introduced into an under-vaccinated North American Amish community propagate geographically (Kisjes et al. 2014)? |
Decision analysis | * Structures complex decision space * Deals with conditional probabilities and/or choices |
* Traditionally does not account for dynamic complexity | * What are the key poliovirus risk management options for countries and the world (Sangrujee et al. 2003; Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2012; Thompson et al. 2013a)? * What are possible frameworks to assess the value of information obtained through poliovirus surveillance (de Gourville et al. 2006) ? |
Economic modeling | * Characterizes economic inputs * Supports evaluation of trade-offs in the context of limited resources * Facilitates evaluation of behavioral responses to economic incentives * Facilitates optimization of resources and economic outcomes |
* Ignores population-level or other dynamics * Ignores uncertainty and variability |
* What are the costs of post-eradication policies (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2006b)? * What are the costs of the Global Polio Laboratory Network (de Gourville et al. 2006)? * What are the true costs of different IPV formulations and delivery options (Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2014b)? * What are the national incentives to stop OPV and what does this mean for global coordination (Thompson and Duintjer Tebbens 2008a)? |
Probabilistic risk analysis, including expert judgment | * Quantifies impact of random events with rigorous methods based on probability and statistics * Accounts for dependence between random variables * Quantifies uncertainty and variability using available data and/or expert judgment * Identifies knowledge gaps and research priorities |
* Requires significant effort * Depends on quality of available evidence/data and/or expert knowledge |
* What are the risks of poliovirus reintroductions in the post-eradication era (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2006a)? * What is the evidence-base to assess poliovirus immunity, transmission, and evolution, and what are the key limitations of the existing studies (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2013a; Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2013d)? * What are the consensus and uncertainty related to estimates to characterize poliovirus immunity and transmission and what future studies may fill key knowledge gaps (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2013b)? |
(Probabilistic) uncertainty and sensitivity analysis | * Helps understand and communicate impact of uncertainty * Accounts for non-linearity and interaction and/or dependence between uncertain inputs (depending on method) * Helps prioritize research to fill knowledge gaps |
Always used in combination with other modeling tools | * What are the key uncertainties affecting the net benefits of long-term poliovirus risk management options (used in combination with integrated models) (Duintjer Tebbens et al. 2008a; Duintjer Tebbens and Thompson 2016b)? * What are the key uncertainties affecting the net benefits of policies to manage long-term iVDPV risks (used in combination with DES and integrated models) (Duintjer Tebbens and Thompson 2017a)? |