Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;45(10):2197–2204. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00881-8

Table 4.

Performance of ROC-derived cut-off values for FIB-4, APRI, and NAFLD Fibrosis score in identification of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD.

Parameter Number of patients (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) LRP LRN DOR Youden’s J p value
Overall (n=368)
FIB-4 Score
FIB-4 > 0.5 262 (71) 97 34 44 21 98 1.5 0.10 13.8 0.31 <0.001
FIB-4 > 1.0a 113 (31) 88 80 81 45 97 4.4 0.15 29.3 0.68 <0.001
FIB-4 > 2.0 47 (13) 57 95 89 70 92 12.6 0.45 27.9 0.52 <0.001
APRI Score
APRI > 0.15 246 (67) 98 39 48 23 99 1.61 0.04 36.5 0.37 <0.001
APRI > 0.29a 128 (35) 81 72 73 35 95 2.9 0.26 11.1 0.53 <0.001
APRI > 0.9 31 (8) 32 96 86 61 88 8.46 0.70 12.1 0.28 <0.001
NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS)
NFS > -3.5 337 (92) 96 9 23 17 94 1.07 0.37 2.9 0.05 0.137
NFS > –0.4a 159 (43) 79 64 66 29 94 2.18 0.33 6.6 0.43 <0.001
NFS > 1.8 34 (9) 24 94 83 41 87 3.74 0.81 4.6 0.18 <0.001

FIB-4 fibrosis 4 score, APRI aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, LRP likelihood ratio positive, LRN likelihood ratio negative, DOR diagnostic odds ratio.

aMost suitable threshold according to ROC analysis and Youden’s J statistic.