Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 May 6;21(5):917–935. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00906-9

Table 4:

Information on the groups created to study the interaction. Means (standard deviation in parenthesis) for age, time between sessions, and scores on standardized tests of math attitudes, multiplication skill, improvement, reading skill, intelligence (IQ), and accuracy (percentage) and response times (RTs; sec) for small and large multiplication problems solved inside the scanner, for the math attitudes groups (i.e. negative attitudes; positive attitudes; n=25 each) and for the improvement groups (i.e. improvers; non-improvers; n=25 each) created to study the math attitudes by improvement interaction.

Math attitudes groups
(median-split)
Improvement groups
(median-split)
Negative attitudes
(n=25)
Positive attitudes
(n=25)
Improvers
(n=25)
Non-improvers
(n=25)
Age at T1 session1 11.0 (1.5) 11.2 (1.4) 10.8 (1.3) 11.5 (1.6)
Age at T2 session1 13.2 (1.7) 13.4 (1.5) 12.9 (1.4) 13.7 (1.7)
Time between sessions1 2.2 (0.3) 2.2 (0.2) 2.2 (0.2) 2.2 (0.3)
Female/male ratio 13/12 13/12 12/13 14/11
Math attitudes at T12 35.8 (4.7) 49.6 (4.3) 43.5 (9.4) 42.0 (7)
Multiplication skill T12 10.6 (6) 13.0 (4.9) 12.0 (6.1) 11.6 (5.1)
Multiplication skill T22 13.7 (6) 14.3 (5.5) 18.2 (3.7) 9.8 (4)
Improvement T2-T12 0.2 (5.3) −0.2 (5.2) 4.1 (2.7) −4.1 (3.5)
Reading skill at T13 107.4 (9.9) 106.0 (12.7) 106.8 (10.3) 103.6 (11.2)
Full IQ at T13 109.5 (13.8) 115.1 (15.3) 118.5 (14) 106.1 (12.8)
% Accuracy: Small 87.1 (14.2) 91.8 (11.1) 93.2 (8.8)* 85.7 (15.2)*
% Accuracy: Large 67.0 (17.2) 69.0 (.02) 74.3 (17.8)** 61.7 (14)**
RTs (sec): Small 1.21 (.37) 1.11 (.35) 1.19 (.34) 1.14 (.38)
RTs (sec): Large 1.37 (.37) 1.36 (.41) 1.44 (.38) 1.29 (.39)

Note.

1

In years.

2

Raw scores;

3

Standard scores.

T1: Time 1; T2: Time 2. See section 2.2. for a description of the standardized tests included in this table.

(*)

Significant differences between improvement groups for small problems (t(48) = −2.13, p = .04);

(**)

Significant differences between improvement groups for large problems (t(48) = −2.76, p = .008).