TABLE 4.
NRMSE, SSIM, and Pearson correlation coefficients of predicted results compared to true 11C-UCB-J images from four networks
| #1: SUVR to SUVR |
#2: Ki Ratio to SUVR |
#3: SUVR to DVR |
#4: Ki Ratio to DVR |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pred-True | Input-True | Pred-True | Input-True | Pred-True | Input-True | Pred-True | Input-True | |
| AD | ||||||||
| NRMSE | 16.2% (2.9%) | / | 17.8% (3.3%) | / | 18.1% (3.3%) | / | 20.0% (3.5%) | / |
| SSIM | 0.903 (0.033) | 0.866 (0.037) | 0.880 (0.032) | 0.737 (0.037) | 0.890 (0.029) | 0.773 (0.033) | 0.875 (0.026) | 0.795 (0.040) |
| ρ | 0.963 (0.012) | 0.932 (0.014) | 0.955 (0.014) | 0.884 (0.042) | 0.937 (0.020) | 0.863 (0.024) | 0.924 (0.023) | 0.799 (0.057) |
| CN | ||||||||
| NRMSE | 15.6% (2.6%) | / | 16.8% (2.7%) | / | 17.4% (2.4%) | / | 19.0% (2.5%) | / |
| SSIM | 0.910 (0.030) | 0.874 (0.037) | 0.890 (0.029) | 0.751 (0.021) | 0.902 (0.019) | 0.781 (0.028) | 0.885 (0.024) | 0.807 (0.024) |
| ρ | 0.967 (0.011) | 0.944 (0.012) | 0.961 (0.012) | 0.908 (0.022) | 0.945 (0.014) | 0.883 (0.016) | 0.935 (0.016) | 0.835 (0.029) |
| All | ||||||||
| NRMSE | 16.0% (2.8%) | / | 17.4% (3.1%) | / | 17.9% (3.0%) | / | 19.7% (3.2%) | / |
| SSIM | 0.906 (0.032) | 0.869 (0.037) | 0.884 (0.031) | 0.743 (0.033) | 0.895 (0.026) | 0.776 (0.032) | 0.879 (0.026) | 0.799 (0.035) |
| ρ | 0.965 (0.011) | 0.937 (0.014) | 0.957 (0.013) | 0.894 (0.037) | 0.940 (0.018) | 0.870 (0.023) | 0.928 (0.021) | 0.813 (0.051) |
All the results were displayed by mean (SD)
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; All, All the Subjects; CN, Cognitively Normal.