Skip to main content
Zoological Research logoLink to Zoological Research
. 2021 Sep 18;42(5):614–619. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.117

Chromatin accessibility profiling provides insights into larval cuticle color and adult longevity in butterflies

Wen-Ting Wan 1,2, Zhi-Wei Dong 2, Yan-Dong Ren 1, Jie Yang 1, Xiang-Yu Pan 3, Jin-Wu He 1,2, Zhou Chang 2, Wei Liu 2, Gui-Chun Liu 2, Ruo-Ping Zhao 2, Ping Hu 2, Chu-Yang Mao 2,4, Jun Li 2,4, Wen Wang 1,2,5,*, Xue-Yan Li 2,*
PMCID: PMC8455473  PMID: 34402607

Abstract

Butterflies are diverse in virtually all aspects of their ontogeny, including morphology, life history, and behavior. However, the developmental regulatory mechanisms underlying the important phenotypic traits of butterflies at different developmental stages remain unknown. Here, we investigated the developmental regulatory profiles of butterflies based on transposase accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) at three developmental stages in two representative species (Papilio xuthus and Kallima inachus). Results indicated that 15%–47% of open chromatin peaks appeared in associated genes located 3 kb upstream (i.e., promoter region) of their transcription start site (TSS). Comparative analysis of the different developmental stages indicated that chromatin accessibility is a dynamic process and associated genes with differentially accessible (DA) peaks show functions corresponding to their phenotypic traits. Interestingly, the black color pattern in P. xuthus 4th instar larvae may be attributed to promoter peak-related genes involved in the melanogenesis pathway. Furthermore, many longevity genes in 5th instar larvae and pupae showed open peaks 3 kb upstream of their TSS, which may contribute to the overwintering diapause observed in K. inachus adults. Combined with RNA-seq analysis, our data demonstrated that several genes enriched in the melanogenesis and longevity pathways also exhibit higher expression, confirming that the expression of genes may be closely related to their phenotypic traits. This study offers new insights into larval cuticle color and adult longevity in butterflies and provides a resource for investigating the developmental regulatory mechanisms underlying butterfly ontogeny.

Keywords: ATAC-seq, Papilio xuthus, Kallima inachus, Melanogenesis, Longevity


Butterflies are diverse in virtually all aspects of their ontogeny, including morphology, life history, and behavior. However, the developmental regulatory mechanisms underlying the important phenotypic traits of butterflies at different developmental stages remain unknown. Here, we investigated the developmental regulatory profiles of butterflies based on transposase accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) at three developmental stages in two representative species (Papilio xuthus and Kallima inachus). Results indicated that 15%–47% of open chromatin peaks appeared in associated genes located 3 kb upstream (i.e., promoter region) of their transcription start site (TSS). Comparative analysis of the different developmental stages indicated that chromatin accessibility is a dynamic process and associated genes with differentially accessible (DA) peaks show functions corresponding to their phenotypic traits. Interestingly, the black color pattern in P. xuthus 4th instar larvae may be attributed to promoter peak-related genes involved in the melanogenesis pathway. Furthermore, many longevity genes in 5th instar larvae and pupae showed open peaks 3 kb upstream of their TSS, which may contribute to the overwintering diapause observed in K. inachus adults. Combined with RNA-seq analysis, our data demonstrated that several genes enriched in the melanogenesis and longevity pathways also exhibit higher expression, confirming that the expression of genes may be closely related to their phenotypic traits. This study offers new insights into larval cuticle color and adult longevity in butterflies and provides a resource for investigating the developmental regulatory mechanisms underlying butterfly ontogeny.

Butterflies are diverse in virtually all aspects of their biology, ranging from morphology, life history, behavior, and biogeography to cellular biology and biochemistry (Baxter et al., 2008; Boggs et al., 2003; Jiggins et al., 2001; Joron & Mallet, 1998; Kunte, 2009; Nijhout, 1991). The study of butterflies has been an integral part of ecology and evolution ever since Darwin and Wallace proposed the theory of natural selection (Poulton, 1890; Shirataki et al., 2010; Wallace, 1865, 1871). Wing pattern in adult butterflies is considered as an ideal model system to study evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) (Beldade & Brakefield, 2002; John et al., 2011; McMillan et al., 2002; Monteiro, 2015; Reed et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2017). Nevertheless, few studies have dealt with the molecular mechanism underlying morphological evolution in the developmental stages, e.g., larval and pupal stages, which are important in determining the physiological and morphological traits of adults (Futahashi et al., 2012; Shirataki et al., 2010). For example, in 5th instar larvae, many pre-pattern genes that guide morphological development in adults are already pre-activated (Reed & Serfas, 2004), and at the pupal stage, the body is completely remodeled for the developing adult (Martin, 2011). Butterflies have evolved various traits in their developmental stages, from outer morphology (such as body color) and internal physiology to cellular and molecular processes, to adapt to their different habitats (Futahashi & Fujiwara, 2006; Futahashi et al., 2012). However, the developmental regulatory mechanisms underlying the many important phenotypic traits of butterflies during their developmental stages remain unknown.

The genetic and molecular basis of phenotypic evolution is a long-standing puzzle in butterfly evolutionary studies. Since Britten & Davidson (1969) proposed the evolutionary model of regulatory sequences, increasing evidence suggests that the evolution of gene regulation leads to the formation of morphological diversity (Carroll, 2000, 2005, 2008; Carroll et al., 2005; Levine & Tjian, 2003). The profiling of open chromatin regions is an effective way to dissect regulatory genomic regions, as chromatin accessibility is relevant to gene expression regulation via the binding of transcription initiation and regulatory elements, especially in promoter regions (Degner et al., 2012; John et al., 2011; Tsompana & Buck, 2014). The assay of ATAC-seq was recently developed to assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility using hyperactive Tn5 transposase combined with high-throughput sequencing technology (Buenrostro et al., 2013). It has been applied in several butterfly species to investigate the regulatory evolution of wings and adult brain development (Lewis et al., 2019; Lewis & Reed, 2019; Lugena et al., 2019; Van Der Burg et al., 2019). Based on chromatin accessibility analysis, Lewis et al. (2019) identified five cis-regulatory elements of the optix gene underlying color pattern variation in Heliconius. In addition, Van Der Burg et al. (2019) observed dynamic chromatin accessibility during Junonia coenia wing metamorphosis and found that the spineless and EcR transcription factors are associated with changes in accessibility.

To explore the genetic regulatory basis of morphological divergence among butterfly species during development, we investigated chromatin accessibility in three developmental stages (i.e., 4th and 5th instar larvae and pupae) (Figure 1A) in two representative species from two different families (Papilionidae: Papilio xuthus; Nymphalidae: Kallima inachus) using ATAC-seq and RNA-seq. The two selected species, which are distributed in Asia and have high-quality reference genomes available (Li et al., 2015; Nishikawa et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2020), exhibit many morphological and biological differences in the larval, pupal, and adult stages. Papilio xuthus larvae feed on Rutaceae plants (Zanthoxylum piperitum) and have similar body color and background (black and brown) from the 1st to 4th instar larval stages, but show marked changes at the 5th instar stage, with the development of a green cuticle and reduction of black coloration. This species also exhibits diapause at the pupal stage. Kallima inachus larvae feed on Acanthaceae plants (Strobilanthes), and usually have a similar body color at all larval stages (1st to 5th instar). This species usually produces three generations each year, with a 5–7 month diapause stage during adulthood showing excellent concealment (Zhou et al., 2005).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Species studied and schematic of KEGG pathways showing position of associated genes to differentially accessible (DA) ATAC-seq promoter peaks and predicted transcription factors (TFs) at their promoter regions in Papilio xuthus (Px) and Kallima inachus (Kin)

A: Different developmental stages of both species and their phylogenetic position at family level. Three developmental stages (L4, L5, and P) in both species were used for ATAC-seq and RNA-seq. L4: 4th instar larvae, L5: 5th instar larvae, P: pupae. Phylogeny of seven butterfly families follows previously reported results (Espeland et al., 2018). B: DA promoter peak-associated genes of 4th instar larvae vs. 5th instar larvae of P. xuthus were enriched in melanogenesis pathway (ko04916). C: DA promoter peak-associated genes of 4th instar larvae vs. 5th instar larvae and 4th instar larvae vs. pupae of K. inachus were enriched in longevity pathway (ko04213). Pathway processes and involved genes are shown in same color boxes. Genes in dotted boxes indicates that no transcription factor (TF) was identified. Genes in blue represent 4th instar larvae vs. 5th instar larvae. Genes in brown present 4th instar larvae vs. pupae. Genes in red represent both 4th instar larvae vs. 5th instar larvae and 4th instar larvae vs. pupae.

Here, the collected samples were first dissected, after which the ATAC-seq and RNA-seq libraries were constructed (see Supplementary Methods). We then obtained high-quality ATAC-seq data for 4th instar larvae (L4), 5th instar larvae (L5), and pupae (P) for the two butterfly species P. xuthus (Px) and K. inachus (Kin) (Supplementary Table S1). Based on ATAC-seq data analysis, dynamic chromatin accessibility peaks appeared during the different developmental stages in both species (peak numbers, Px: 20 367 (L4), 9 648 (L5), 12001 (P); Kin: 28 751 (L4), 85 433 (L5), 105 067 (P)) (Table 1). We then performed comparative assays between stages for each species, i.e., L4 vs. L5, L4 vs. P, and L5 vs. P (Supplementary Table S2) to identify changes in DA peaks. Results indicated that some accessible sites became stronger or weaker between stages, i.e., showing increased or decreased DA peaks, respectively. Changes in DA peaks were identified for each instar pair in both P. xuthus and K. inachus (Px: 1 212–5208; Kin: 24 755–30 979) (fold-change≥2, P≤0.05) (Supplementary Table S2), suggesting dynamically changing chromatin accessibility in the different developmental stages. By analyzing the distribution of peaks in the corresponding reference genomes (Nishikawa et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2020), 15%–47% of chromatin accessibility peaks and 11%–36% of DA peaks appeared in associated genes located 3 kb upstream of their TSS regions (Supplementary Tables S3, S4), and thus can be considered as promoter peaks (Foissac et al., 2019), which play important roles in the transcription of associated genes. These promoter peaks showed consistent signals at the TSS regions in all developmental stages in both species (Supplementary Figure S1). We also observed some ATAC-seq peaks in gene bodies (either introns or exons) and distal intergenic regions (Supplementary Tables S3, S4). These results indicate that ATAC-seq technology can efficiently detect both proximal and distal intergenic regulatory regions in butterflies.

Table 1. Summary of ATAC-seq peaks and peak-associated genes and motifs of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) in open peaks and transcription factors (TFs) at three developmental stages in Papilio xuthus (Px) and Kallima inachus (Kin) .

Species Developmental stage ATAC-seq peak No. of peak-associated genes (n) No. of motifs and TFs (n)
No. (n) Average length (bp) Total peaks Total genes (n) No. of peak-associated genes
(≤3 kb upstream) (n)
Ratio (%) (≤3 kb upstream) Motifs TFs
L4: 4th instar larvae; L5: 5th instar larvae; P: Pupae.
Px L4 20 367 433 42 016 7 901 5 246 66 14 51
L5 9 648 471 4 313 3 093 72 11 18
P 12 001 402 5 798 3 695 64 8 16
Kin L4 28 751 251 219 251 9 923 4 067 41 14 25
L5 85 433 328 13 538 9 356 69 11 22
P 105 067 379 11 998 10 515 88 9 20

The observed peaks are open chromatin regions, which may contain transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) (Van Der Burg et al., 2019). TFBSs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression mediated by transcription factors (TFs). Therefore, we identified the representative motifs of TFBSs in accessible peaks and predicted their potential TFs in each developmental stage and instar pair using MEME software (v5.3.2) (Machanick & Bailey, 2011). We identified 14, 11, and eight motifs in 4th instar larvae, 5th instar larvae, and pupae of P. xuthus, respectively, and 14, 11, and nine motifs in 4th instar larvae, 5th instar larvae, and pupae of K. inachus, respectively (Table 1; Supplementary Table S5). More motifs in DA peaks were identified in K. inachus (12 motifs in L4 vs. L5 and 14 motifs in L4 vs. P and L5 vs. P) than in P. xuthus (nine motifs in L4 vs. L5, 10 motifs in L4 vs. P, and eight motifs in L5 vs. P) (Supplementary Tables S2, S6). After comparing the identified motifs with known motifs in the JASPAR database (http://jaspar.genereg.net/) using TomTom software (v5.3.2) (Machanick & Bailey, 2011), we mined the potential TFs after combining all motifs. In total, 71 TFs were predicted in the three developmental stages (Supplementary Figure S2; Table 1; Supplementary Tables S5, S7) and 43 TFs binding to TFBSs were predicted within the DA ATAC-seq peaks among the instar pairs in both butterfly species (Supplementary Tables S2, S6, S8). We further analyzed the position of the DA peaks including TFBSs related to these TFs and found that many TFs bind to the promoter regions of genes (Supplementary Table S9). The TFs binding to the DA peaks may therefore regulate morphological changes between stages.

Our ATAC-seq data provide important insights into the molecular mechanism underlying larval color pattern changes in 4th instar larvae (L4) to 5th instar larvae (L5) in P. xuthus (i.e., from black to green) (Figure 1A). Larval pattern switch is an important adaptive strategy and regulated by juvenile hormones during the early L4 stage (JH-sensitive period) (Futahashi & Fujiwara, 2008). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis indicated that the DA ATAC-seq promoter peak-associated genes (XP_013161585.1 and XP_013164165.1) in L4 vs. L5 were significantly related in the melanogenesis pathway (ko04916) (Supplementary Figure S3A and Table S10). However, we failed to identify hormone-related genes with the DA ATAC-seq promoter, which may be because hormones often play key roles during specific developmental time periods, and our sampling focused on different instar larvae, not specific time points. DA ATAC-seq peak analysis showed that the accessible promoter peaks of XP_013161585.1 had strong signals in the L4 stage but no signal in the L5 stage (Supplementary Table S11). The accessible promoter peaks of XP_013164165.1 had signals in both the L4 and L5 stages, but the signals were stronger in L5 (Supplementary Table S11). Based on motif and TF analysis in L4 vs. L5 in P. xuthus, one motif (CCYWYCCCYHYHMCYACCCCC) and one TF (btd) were identified on the promoter region of the gene XP_013164165.1, while no motif or TF was identified on the gene XP_013161585.1 (Figure 1B; Supplementary Table S12). Combined with RNA-seq analysis, XP_013161585.1 and XP_013164165.1 showed slightly higher expression in L4 than in L5 (Supplementary Figure S4A), suggesting that high promoter peak accessibility may promote gene expression. Furthermore, XP_013161585.1 is annotated as a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) p300 and binds to Creb-binding protein (CBP), constituting an important regulatory factor in the Wnt signaling pathway (Li et al., 2007). The signaling ligand WntA, a member of the Wnt family, controls variation in melanin patterning across Heliconius and other butterfly species (Kronforst & Papa, 2015; Van Belleghem et al., 2020). XP_013164165.1 is annotated as protein kinase C (PKC) and indirectly promotes the synthesis of melanin (Figure 1B). Our data indicate that the two genes and open peaks in their promoter regions likely play important roles in the black patterns of the epidermis in 4th instar larvae of P. xuthus. We checked the chromatin accessibility patterns for several well-known genes (ebony, black, laccase, prophenoloxidase, and yellow) encoding enzymes involved in melanin biosynthesis. Results showed that the genes exhibited different open peaks in the three developmental stages in P. xuthus (Supplementary Table S13).

Interestingly, ATAC-seq analysis also provided molecular evidence for the longevity of diapaused adults. Butterflies can hibernate, in the form of diapause, during different developmental stages, but most commonly during the larval and pupal stages (Danks, 1987). Previous study on 290 butterfly species from North America found that diapause is more common in the larval and pupal stages (58% and 24%, respectively) than in the egg and adult stages (13% and 5%, respectively) (Scott, 1979). Further research on 110 Lepidopteran species reported similar results, with diapause predominantly occurring in the larval and pupal stages (93%) and more limitedly in the egg and adult stages (7%) (Saunders, 2002). For example, egg diapause is common in Parnassius species, such as P. apollo, P. bremeri, and P. glacialis (Elwes, 1886; Muscarella, 2010; Weiss, 1999); larval diapause is common in certain Nymphalidae species, such as Limenitis Archippus, and in several Pieridae species, such as Colias alexandra (Clark & Platt, 1969; Hayes, 1982); pupal diapause is most common in Papilionidae species, such as Papilio xuthus, and in Pieridae species, such as Pieris rapae (Kaneko & Katagiri, 2004; Yamanaka et al., 2004); and adult diapause is found in Nymphalidae species, such as K. inachus and Polygonia c-aureum (Hiroyoshi & Reddy, 2018; Protas & Patel, 2008; Zhou et al., 2005). Based on KEGG enrichment analysis, we identified several K. inachus genes enriched in the longevity regulating pathway (ko04213) in the L4 vs. L5 (18 genes) and L4 vs. P (25 genes) comparisons, which were distributed throughout the whole pathway (Supplementary Figure S3B, C and Table S10). In addition, we identified five motifs and 17 TFs on the promoter regions of five out of the 18 identified genes in L4 vs. L5, and five motifs and seven TFs on the promoter regions of three out of the 25 identified genes in L4 vs. P (Figure 1C; Supplementary Table S12). Among the 18 genes identified from the L4 vs. L5 comparison, two DA promoter peaks of one gene (Kin_11440) showed significantly stronger signals in L4 larvae, but no signal in L5 larvae, while another 18 DA promoter peaks near 17 genes showed significantly stronger signals in L5 (Supplementary Table S11). Based on combined RNA-seq analysis, three genes (Kin_10196, Kin_11440, and Kin_13522) out of the 18 identified genes showed significantly higher expression in L5 (Supplementary Figure S4B). Kin_13522 is annotated as an alpha crystallin/heat shock protein, which comes from a family of large and dynamic oligomers that are highly expressed in long-lived muscle, lens, and brain cells (Augusteyn, 2004; Bagneris et al., 2009). Among the 25 genes identified from the L4 vs. P comparison, two DA promoter peaks near two genes showed significantly strong signals in the L4 stage but no signal in the P stage, while 29 DA promoter peaks in 25 genes showed significantly stronger signals in the P stage (Supplementary Table S11). Based on combined RNA-seq analysis, six (Kin_07423, Kin_13471, Kin_13473, Kin_13532, Kin_13535, and Kin_14010) out of the 25 identified genes showed significantly high expression in the P stage (Supplementary Figure S4C). Several of these highly expressed genes (Kin_07423, Kin_13473, Kin_13532, Kin_13535, and Kin_13471) are annotated as alpha crystallin/heat shock proteins and heat shock protein 70, which are closely related to organismal growth and development, metabolic activity, apoptosis, and longevity (Bagneris et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2005; Seddigh, 2019; Shilova et al., 2018; Vos et al., 2016). Comparing the larval and pupal stages of K. inachus, we found that more genes were enriched in the longevity regulating pathway in pupae. These data suggest that, compared with the L4 stage, more accessible promoter peaks with longevity-related genes were open in the L5 and P stages, and most showed higher expression. Notably, the number and expression of genes enriched in the longevity regulating pathway were markedly higher in the pupae of K. inachus. The results demonstrate that adult diapause and overwintering could be attributed to the regulatory expression of longevity genes in 5th instar larvae and pupae. Thus, our data lay a novel foundation for future investigations on adult overwintering in butterflies.

Taken together, we revealed the chromatin accessibility profiles of three developmental stages in two butterfly species from Papilionidae and Nymphalidae. Our results showed that chromatin accessibility is a dynamic process across all developmental stages and is highly correlated with phenotypic traits. Furthermore, we showed that two genes in 4th instar larvae, which function in the melanogenesis pathway, had open peaks at their promoter regions and may play key roles in the cuticle color of such larvae in P. xuthus. We also found that longevity in diapaused adults may benefit molecularly from the expression of longevity genes in 5th instar larvae and pupae. This study not only provides novel insights into larval cuticle color and adult longevity, but also provides an important data resource for investigating developmental regulatory mechanisms in butterfly ontogeny.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data for the three developmental stages (in fastq format) used in this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI with Accession Nos. SRP313417 and SRP313418.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data to this article can be found online.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

X.Y.L. and W.W. conceived the study, designed the scientific objectives, led the project, and prepared the manuscript. W.T.W. conducted library construction and data analyses. Y.D.R., J.Y., X.Y.P., W.L., J.W.H., and C.Y.M. helped with data analyses. Z.C., W.T.W., Z.W.D., G.C.L., and R.P.Z. raised the butterflies and prepared RNA samples for genomic sequencing. Z.W.D., J.W.H., P.H., and J.L. helped with manuscript preparation. W.T.W., X.Y.L., and W.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Prof. Yong Wang for suggestions in designing this work.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621062 to W.W., 32070482 to X.Y.L.) and Chinese Academy of Sciences (“Light of West China” to X.Y.L., XDB13000000 to W.W.)

Contributor Information

Wen Wang, Email: wwang@mail.kiz.ac.cn.

Xue-Yan Li, Email: lixy@mail.kiz.ac.cn.

References

  • 1.Augusteyn RC α-crystallin: a review of its structure and function. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2004;87(6):356–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb03095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bagneris C, Bateman OA, Naylor CE, Cronin N, Boelens WC, Keep NH, et al Crystal structures of α-crystallin domain dimers of αB-crystallin and Hsp20. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2009;392(5):1242–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baxter SW, Papa R, Chamberlain N, Humphray SJ, Joron M, Morrison C, et al Convergent evolution in the genetic basis of Mullerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Genetics. 2008;180(3):1567–1577. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.082982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beldade P, Brakefield PM The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2002;3(6):442–452. doi: 10.1038/nrg818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR. 2003. Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 6.Britten RJ, Davidson EH Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science. 1969;165(3891):349–357. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3891.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nature Methods. 2013;10(12):1213–1218. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carroll SB Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity. Cell. 2000;101(6):577–580. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80868-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carroll SB Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biology. 2005;3(7):e245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carroll SB Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell. 2008;134(1):25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD. 2005. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  • 12.Clark SH, Platt AP Influence of photoperiod on development and larval diapause in the viceroy butterfly, Limenitis Archippus. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1969;15(10):1951–1957. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(69)90024-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Danks H. 1987. Insect Dormancy: An Ecological Perspective. Ottawa: The Biological Survey of Canada.
  • 14.Degner JF, Pai AA, Pique-Regi R, Veyrieras JB, Gaffney DJ, Pickrell JK, et al DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature. 2012;482(7385):390–394. doi: 10.1038/nature10808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elwes HJ On butterflies of the genus Pernassius . Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1886;20:6–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Espeland M, Breinholt J, Willmott KR, Warren AD, Vila R, Toussaint EFA, et al A comprehensive and dated phylogenomic analysis of butterflies. Current Biology. 2018;28(5):770–778.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foissac S, Djebali S, Munyard K, Vialaneix N, Rau A, Muret K, et al Multi-species annotation of transcriptome and chromatin structure in domesticated animals. BMC Biology. 2019;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0726-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Futahashi R, Fujiwara H Expression of one isoform of GTP cyclohydrolase I coincides with the larval black markings of the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2006;36(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Futahashi R, Fujiwara H Juvenile hormone regulates butterfly larval pattern switches. Science. 2008;319(5866):1061. doi: 10.1126/science.1149786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Futahashi R, Shirataki H, Narita T, Mita K, Fujiwara H Comprehensive microarray-based analysis for stage-specific larval camouflage pattern-associated genes in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus . BMC Biology. 2012;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayes JL Diapause and diapause dynamics of Colias alexandra (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) . Oecologia. 1982;53(3):317–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00389007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hiroyoshi S, Reddy GVP Field and laboratory studies on the ecology, reproduction, and adult diapause of the Asian Comma Butterfly, Polygonia c-aureum L . (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Insects. 2018;9(4):169. doi: 10.3390/insects9040169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 2001;411(6835):302–305. doi: 10.1038/35077075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joron M, Mallet JLB Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1998;13(11):461–466. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01483-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.John S, Sabo PJ, Thurman RE, Sung MH, Biddie SC, Johnson TA, et al Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nature Genetics. 2011;43(3):264–268. doi: 10.1038/ng.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaneko J, Katagiri C Epicuticular wax of large and small white butterflies, Pieris brassicae and P. rapae crucivora: qualitative and quantitative comparison between diapause and non-diapause pupae . Naturwissenschaften. 2004;91(7):320–323. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0535-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kronforst MR, Papa R The functional basis of wing patterning in Heliconius butterflies: the molecules behind mimicry . Genetics. 2015;200(1):1–19. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.172387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kunte K The diversity and evolution of batesian mimicry in Papilio swallowtail butterflies . Evolution. 2009;63(10):2707–2716. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee S, Carson K, Rice-Ficht A, Good T Hsp20, a novel α-crystallin, prevents Aβ fibril formation and toxicity. Protein Science. 2005;14(3):593–601. doi: 10.1110/ps.041020705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levine M, Tjian R Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature. 2003;424(6945):147–151. doi: 10.1038/nature01763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lewis JJ, Geltman RC, Pollak PC, Rondem KE, Van Belleghem SM, Hubisz MJ, et al Parallel evolution of ancient, pleiotropic enhancers underlies butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116(48):24174–24183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907068116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lewis JJ, Reed RD Genome-wide regulatory adaptation shapes population-level genomic landscapes in Heliconius . Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2019;36(1):159–173. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li J, Sutter C, Parker DS, Blauwkamp T, Fang M, Cadigan KM CBP/p300 are bimodal regulators of Wnt signaling. The EMBO Journal. 2007;26(9):2284–2294. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li XY, Fan DD, Zhang W, Liu GC, Zhang L, Zhao L, et al Outbred genome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in butterflies. Nature Communications. 2015;6(1):8212. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lugena AB, Zhang Y, Menet JS, Merlin C Genome-wide discovery of the daily transcriptome, DNA regulatory elements and transcription factor occupancy in the monarch butterfly brain. PLoS Genetics. 2019;15(7):e1008265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Machanick P, Bailey TL MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(12):1696–1697. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martin M Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing Reads. EMBnet Journal. 2011;17(1):10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McMillan WO, Monteiro A, Kapan DD Development and evolution on the wing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2002;17(3):125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Monteiro A Origin, development, and evolution of butterfly eyespots. Annual Review of Entomology. 2015;60(1):253–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muscarella C. 2010. Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758).
  • 41.Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
  • 42.Nishikawa H, Iijima T, Kajitani R, Yamaguchi J, Ando T, Suzuki Y, et al A genetic mechanism for female-limited Batesian mimicry in Papilio butterfly . Nature Genetics. 2015;47(4):405–409. doi: 10.1038/ng.3241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Poulton EB. 1890. The colours of animals, their meaning and use, especially considered in the case of insects. By Edward Bagnall Poulton (International Scientific Series, Vol. LXVII.). New York, Appleton. Science, XVI(407): 286.
  • 44.Protas ME, Patel NH Evolution of coloration patterns. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2008;24(1):425–446. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reed RD, Papa R, Martin A, Hines HM, Counterman BA, Pardo-Diaz C, et al Optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry . Science. 2011;333(6046):1137–1141. doi: 10.1126/science.1208227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reed RD, Serfas MS Butterfly wing pattern evolution is associated with changes in a Notch/Distal-less temporal pattern formation process. Current Biology. 2004;14(13):1159–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Saunders DS, Steel CGH, Vafopoulou X, Lewis RD. 2002. Insect Clocks. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–551.
  • 48.Scott JA Hibernal diapause of North American Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. 1979;18(3):171–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Seddigh S Proteomics analysis of two heat shock proteins in insects. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 2019;37(10):2652–2668. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2018.1494632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shilova VY, Zatsepina OG, Garbuz DG, Funikov SY, Zelentsova ES, Schostak NG, et al Heat shock protein 70 from a thermotolerant Diptera species provides higher thermoresistance to Drosophila larvae than correspondent endogenous gene . Insect Molecular Biology. 2018;27(1):61–72. doi: 10.1111/imb.12339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shirataki H, Futahashi R, Fujiwara H Species-specific coordinated gene expression and trans-regulation of larval color pattern in three swallowtail butterflies . Evolution & Development. 2010;12(3):305–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tsompana M, Buck MJ Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2014;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Belleghem SM, Roman PAA, Gutierrez HC, Counterman BA, Papa R Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development . Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020;287(1931):20201267. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Van Der Burg KRL, Lewis JJ, Martin A, Nijhout HF, Danko CG, Reed RD Contrasting roles of transcription factors spineless and EcR in the highly dynamic chromatin landscape of butterfly wing metamorphosis. Cell Reports. 2019;27(4):1027–1038.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vos MJ, Carra S, Kanon B, Bosveld F, Klauke K, Sibon OCM, et al Specific protein homeostatic functions of small heat-shock proteins increase lifespan. Aging Cell. 2016;15(2):217–226. doi: 10.1111/acel.12422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wallace AR I. On the phenomena of variation and geographical distribution as illustrated by the Papilionidae of the Malayan Region. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London. 1865;25(1):1–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1865.tb00178.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wallace AR. 1871. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection: a Series of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 58.Weiss JC. 1999. The Parnassius of the world, Part 3. Hillside Books, Canterberry.
  • 59.Yamanaka A, Imai H, Adachi M, Komatsu M, Islam ATMF, Kodama I, et al Hormonal control of the orange coloration of diapause pupae in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) . Zoological Science. 2004;21(10):1049–1055. doi: 10.2108/zsj.21.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang J, Wan WT, Xie M, Mao JL, Dong ZW, Lu SH, et al Chromosome-level reference genome assembly and gene editing of the dead-leaf butterfly Kallima inachus . Molecular Ecology Resources. 2020;20(4):1080–1092. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang LL, Mazo-Vargas A, Reed RD Single master regulatory gene coordinates the evolution and development of butterfly color and iridescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114(40):10707–10712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1709058114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhou CL, Shi JY, Yi CH, Chen XM Research on biology of Kallima inachus . Sichuan Journal of Zoology. 2005;24(4):445–450. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data to this article can be found online.

Data Availability Statement

All ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data for the three developmental stages (in fastq format) used in this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI with Accession Nos. SRP313417 and SRP313418.


Articles from Zoological Research are provided here courtesy of Editorial Office of Zoological Research, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES