Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Mar 22;36(2):157–176. doi: 10.1037/adb0000699

Table 1.

Students’ Alcohol Consumption, and Receptiveness to Various Treatment Options, by Sex

TOTAL (N = 396) MEN (n = 140) WOMEN (n = 256) Sex differences
Alcohol Usea n % M SD - - missd n % M SD - - missd n % M SD - - missd t df
 Age at first use - - 16.05 1.76 - - 3 - - 15.90 2.36 - - 2 - - 16.13 1.32 - - 1 −1.04 184.52
 Alcohol Composite (standardized composite) - - 0.54 4.31 - - 56 - - 2.43 4.78 - - 13 - - −0.59 3.56 - - 43 6.16 *** 209.6
  Past year: Frequency of drinkingb - - 5.39 1.81 - - 0 - - 5.60 1.83 - - 0 - - 5.28 1.79 - - 0 1.68 394
  Past year: Drinking quantity - - 4.30 2.17 - - 3 - - 5.43 2.65 - - 0 - - 3.67 1.54 - - 3 7.21 *** 191.86
  Past year: Largest quantity of drinks in one day - - 8.72 5.17 - - 1 - - 11.49 6.28 - - 0 - - 7.20 3.65 - - 1 7.43 *** 191.58
  Past year: Frequency of largest number of drinks in one dayb - - 2.12 1.53 - - 0 - - 2.24 1.72 - - 0 - - 2.05 1.42 - - 0 1.04 242.63
  Past year: Frequency of binge drinking (4/5 drinks in 2 hours)b - - 3.97 2.23 - - 5 - - 4.42 2.25 - - 3 - - 3.73 2.18 - - 2 2.94 ** 389
  Past year: Frequency of 12+ drinks in dayb - - 1.73 1.42 - - 54 - - 2.31 1.84 - - 13 - - 1.38 0.96 - - 41 5.27 *** 167.28
AUDIT Total Scorec - - 7.71 5.05 - - 6 - - 9.12 5.70 - - 4 - - 6.97 4.52 - - 2 3.95 *** 242.73
TOTAL (N = 438) MEN (n = 152) WOMEN (n = 286) Sex differencesh
n % M SD M SD missd n % M SD M SD missd n % M SD M SD missd χ2 df
Interest in Changing Drinking e
 If wanted to change drinking, I’d be open to (select all): - - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - - 0
  Strategies to help cut down 330 75% - - - - - 110 72% - - - - - 220 77% - - - - - 0.61 1
  Strategies to stop drinking all together 75 17% - - - - - 35 23% - - - - - 40 14% - - - - - 6.31 * 1
  Another option 11 3% - - - - - 6 4% - - - - - 5 2% - - - - - 2.07 1
  None of these 45 10% - - - - - 13 9% - - - - - 32 11% - - - - - 0.64 1
All studentsg Receptive studentsg All studentsg Receptive studentsg All students Students
Receptiveness to Treatment Optionse,f n % M SD M SD missd n % M SD M SD missd n % M SD M SD missd t df i
Self-help 322 74% - - - - 0 101 66% - - - - 0 221 77% - - - - 0 - -
  self-help book 134 31% 2.54 1.53 4.59 0.70 0 40 26% 2.32 1.49 4.53 0.68 0 94 33% 2.66 1.54 4.62 0.70 0 2.22* 436
  self-help blog/informational website 185 42% 2.83 1.63 4.56 0.67 1 56 37% 2.56 1.60 4.48 0.63 0 129 45% 2.98 1.63 4.60 0.68 1 2.56* 435
  computer-based self-help program (guided/developed by mental health professional) 169 39% 2.81 1.58 5.59 0.68 0 50 33% 2.53 1.50 4.42 0.61 0 119 42% 2.96 1.61 4.66 0.69 0 2.74** 436
  self-help group 198 46% 3.01 1.62 4.61 0.65 4 64 43% 2.83 1.60 4.52 0.59 2 134 47% 3.11 1.62 4.65 0.67 2 −1.70 432
  smartphone applications 205 47% 3.08 1.71 4.73 0.74 0 51 34% 2.61 1.61 4.65 0.69 0 154 54% 3.34 1.71 4.75 0.75 0 4.31*** 436
Remote/Telehealth Options 238 54% - - - - 0 63 41% - - - - 0 175 61% - - - - 0 - -
  text messaging therapy services 155 36% 2.70 1.59 4.60 0.69 3 39 26% 2.34 1.40 4.38 0.67 0 116 41% 2.90 1.65 4.67 0.68 3 3.74*** 353.06
  remote/teletherapy 128 29% 2.57 1.56 4.73 0.71 1 35 23% 2.28 1.37 - - 0 93 33% 2.73 1.64 4.84 0.70 1 3.03** 358.61
  personalized feedback via online format (education and PFI) 162 37% 2.75 1.61 4.60 0.74 1 46 30% 2.42 1.46 4.37 0.61 0 116 41% 2.92 1.66 4.70 0.77 1 3.12** 435
Individual Therapy/Group Approaches (in-person) 276 63% - - - - 0 82 54% - - 4.43 0.65 0 194 68% - - - - 0 - -
  on-campus groups with therapist 126 29% 2.55 1.49 4.61 0.67 1 41 27% 2.49 1.46 4.56 0.67 0 85 30% 2.59 1.51 4.63 0.67 1 −0.68 435
  on-campus individual therapy 215 49% 3.18 1.72 4.76 0.70 3 67 44% 2.97 1.70 4.7 0.72 1 148 52% 3.29 1.72 4.79 0.69 2 −1.80 433
  off-campus groups with therapist 145 34% 2.69 1.51 4.57 0.66 6 51 34% 2.62 1.46 4.41 0.61 1 94 33% 2.72 1.54 4.66 0.68 5 −0.63 430
  off-campus individual therapy 234 53% 3.41 1.71 4.85 0.72 0 69 45% 3.10 1.69 4.72 0.66 0 165 59% 3.57 1.70 4.88 0.74 4 2.79** 436
Informal Workshops/Harm Reduction 288 66% - - - - 0 85 56% - - - - 0 203 71% - - - - 0 - -
  on-campus workshop about reducing risky alcohol use 124 28% 2.49 1.47 4.53 0.71 0 46 30% 2.51 1.48 4.46 0.66 0 78 27% 2.49 1.47 4.58 0.75 0 0.14 436
  ride share program through campus 262 60% 3.66 1.78 4.97 0.78 0 76 50% 3.24 1.71 4.76 0.76 0 186 65% 3.88 1.78 5.05 0.77 0 3.66*** 436
Medication 125 29% - - - - 3 31 20% - - - - 0 94 33% - - - - 3 - -
  medication by injection 56 13% 1.79 1.21 4.52 0.66 3 21 14% 1.76 1.24 4.48 0.68 0 35 12% 1.80 1.20 4.54 0.66 3 −0.37 433
  medication on days where I drink 103 24% 2.18 1.43 4.46 0.62 3 39 26% 1.94 1.25 4.32 0.78 0 78 28% 2.30 1.50 4.50 0.66 3 2.69** 361.29
  daily medication 57 13% 1.84 1.23 4.56 0.63 4 20 13% 1.77 1.23 4.55 0.6 0 37 13% 1.88 1.23 4.57 0.64 4 −0.89 432
Medical Provider Appointment
  appointment with primary care/family doctor 230 53% 3.28 1.69 4.73 0.72 1 76 50% 3.14 1.66 4.63 0.71 0 154 54% 3.35 1.71 4.78 0.73 1 −1.25 435
Peer/Family Interactions 412 94% - - - - 1 141 93% - - - - 1 271 95% - - - - 0 - -
  talk with my friends 395 90% 4.95 1.24 5.28 0.70 1 133 88% 4.94 1.34 5.35 0.74 0 262 92% 4.96 1.18 5.25 0.69 0 −0.14 435
  talk with my family 352 81% 4.54 1.51 5.19 0.75 1 124 82% 4.63 1.50 5.22 0.81 0 228 80% 4.50 1.51 5.16 0.71 0 0.87 435
  social networking sites/forums (peer-to-peer) 129 30% 2.43 1.53 4.56 0.67 1 50 33% 2.40 1.55 4.42 0.64 0 79 28% 2.44 1.52 4.65 0.68 0 −0.24 435
  talk with my RA 55 13% 1.87 1.16 4.45 0.60 2 25 17% 1.91 1.24 4.36 0.57 1 30 11% 1.85 1.12 4.53 0.63 1 0.5 434
  talk with peer support leader in a club/organization 119 27% 2.38 1.50 4.57 0.63 2 43 28% 2.33 1.46 4.4 0.62 1 76 27% 2.41 1.52 4.67 0.62 1 −0.50 435

Note.

a

A subset of participants answered these items (given late addition of measures). All participants in this subset endorsed current or past alcohol use.

b

Response scale ranges from 1–2 times in the past year (1) to every day (10).

c

N = 424 (total); N = 146 (men); N = 278 (women). AUDIT sum scores calculated for those with past year alcohol use and no missing AUDIT items.

d

Missing column reflects missing datapoints due to participants electing to skip that item. Denominators for percentages account for this.

e

Items administered to all participants that endorsed current or past alcohol use.

f

Frequency represents scores of ‘somewhat’ to ‘strongly’ agree and Mean represents average of full response scale (i.e., 1–6).

g

“All Students” = M, SD for all students that reported alcohol use. “Receptive Students” = M, SD among those that were receptive (i.e., scoring ≥4 on receptiveness scale).

h

Sex differences reflect differences between the “all students” for men and women.

i

Degrees of freedom (df) account for test of equality of variances (using Satterthwaite when equality of variances assumption is violated); therefore, some df include fractional values.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001