TABLE 4.
The optimal recognition accuracy of different individuals and their corresponding TQWT parameter combinations.
| Subject |
TQWT parameter
|
Accuracy (%)
|
|||
| Q | r | J | Before BGWO | After BGWO | |
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 52.38 | 60.32 |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 42.86 | 46.03 |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 89.68 | 90.48 |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 52.78 | 54.76 |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 59.52 | 59.92 |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 82.14 | 83.33 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 59.52 | 63.1 |
| 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 67.86 | 74.21 |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 77.38 | 77.78 |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 79.76 | 80.56 |
| 11 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 57.94 | 58.33 |
| 12 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 57.54 | 58.73 |
| 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 52.38 | 55.95 |
| 14 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 57.54 | 59.92 |
| 15 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 85.71 | 87.3 |
| 16 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 85.32 | 85.71 |
| 17 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 82.94 | 83.33 |
| 18 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 70.24 | 73.41 |
| 19 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 68.25 | 69.84 |
| 20 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 88.10 | 88.10 |
| 21 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 62.70 | 72.22 |
| 22 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 51.59 | 55.16 |
| 23 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 67.86 | 72.22 |
| 24 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 70.24 | 75.40 |
| 25 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 54.37 | 61.9 |
| 26 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 51.98 | 60.32 |
| 27 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 55.16 | 57.14 |
| 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.46 | 43.25 |
| 29 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 45.63 | 48.41 |
| 30 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 67.06 | 75.4 |
| 31 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 73.02 | 73.41 |
| 32 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 74.60 | 77.78 |
| Average | 65.20 | 68.24 | |||
| Std | 13.72 | 12.99 | |||
Bold values indicate the subject maximum accuracy.