Skip to main content
. 1999 Mar;37(3):818–820. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.3.818-820.1999

TABLE 1.

Division of 46 GRE isolates from a single patient into 10 groups and subgroups by combination of identification to species level, PFGE subtype and structure, and location of VanA element

GRE isolate group Species PFGE typea Date first isolated (mo/day/yr) Date last isolated (mo/day/yr) VanA elementb No. of isolates in group Subgroups Hybridization with vanA probe No. of isolates
1 E. faecium i 9/28/95 11/23/95 H 13 Chromosomal band only 13
2 E. faecium ii 9/28/95 10/19/95 H 11 Chromosomal band only 11
3 E. faecalis iii 10/19/95 12/18/95 H 13 a Chromosomal band only 8
b Plasmid of ca. 35 MDa and chromosomal band 1
c Plasmid of ca. 70 MDa and chromosomal band 3
4 E. faecium iv 11/3/95 12/12/95 H 3 Chromosomal band only 3
5 E. faecalis iii 11/21/95 11/23/95 U 2 a Plasmid of ca. 35 MDa and chromosomal band 1
b Plasmid of ca. 70 MDa and chromosomal band 1
6 E. faecium v 12/8/95 12/18/95 H 3 Chromosomal band only 3
7 E. faecium vi 12/18/95 W 1 Plasmid of ca. 35 MDa and chromosomal band 1
a

PFGE profiles were analyzed according to the criteria described by Tenover et al. (8). Profiles of types i and vi differed by four to six bands, suggesting that they were possibly related; the same was true for types ii and iv. All other types differed by more than six bands. 

b

Groups are in accordance with previous designations (12).