Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;32(8):998–1007. doi: 10.1111/clr.13794

TABLE 3.

Implant insertion level at surgery and bone level changes between succeeding evaluation periods

N DIB surgery (Mean ± SD) N BLC surgery–load (Mean ± SD) N BLC load–12 M (Mean ± SD) N BLC 12−60 M (Mean ± SD)
Mesial Subcrestal 22 −0.94 ± 0.54 20 −0.82 ± 0.49a 19 0.00 ± 0.47 16 0.12 ± 0.26
Epicrestal 20 0.02 ± 0.05 20 −0.40 ± 0.45 20 0.15 ± 0.46 13 0.12 ± 0.21
Supracrestal 10 0.68 ± 0.26 10 −0.17 ± 0.32 7 0.40 ± 0.29 6 0.23 ± 0.35
p < .01 p = .127 p = .665
Distal Subcrestal 16 −0.79 ± 0.39 16 −0.58 ± 0.49 16 −0.06 ± 0.47 15 0.02 ± 0.18
Epicrestal 22 0.01 ± 0.03 21 −0.45 ± 0.38 20 0.14 ± 0.46 12 0.08 ± 0.25
Supracrestal 14 0.76 ± 0.37 13 −0.38 ± 0.48 10 0.32 ± 0.55 8 0.35 ± 0.59
p = .467 p = .149 p = .091
Mean Subcrestal 23 −0.68 ± 0.29 22 −0.70 ± 0.33a 22 0.06 ± 0.41 20 0.09 ± 0.16
Epicrestal 15 0.01 ± 0.03 14 −0.34 ± 0.40 13 0.07 ± 0.49 6 0.05 ± 0.21
Supracrestal 14 0.56 ± 0.25 14 −0.34 ± 0.44 11 0.29 ± 0.29 9 0.26 ± 0.42
p = .005 p = .303 p = .188

Classification according to mesial and distal DIB measurements at surgery for the respective implant side or according to the averaged mesial and distal measurements of DIB for mean values per implant. p values for One‐way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis using Tukey correction. α = 0.05.

a

Statistically different from implants placed epicrestal and the implants placed supracrestal