Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;92(10):1044–1052. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325932

Table 4.

Outcome at last follow-up and its association with underlying genetic abnormality and medication changes following the genetic diagnosis

Outcome at last follow-up (compared with before genetic diagnosis), n (%) Successful PM treatment tried and successful*, n (%) Treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms, successful*, n (%) Genetic abnormality, n (%) ACMG classification >3,23 when applicable, n (%)
A.Improved, 98 (34) 7 (70) 16 (64) 85 SNV (87%)
6 CNV (6%)
6 CI (6%)
one repeat expansion (1%)
56 (84%)
B.Stable, 177 (60) 3 (30) 8 (32) 147 SNV (84%)
10 CNV (6%)
1 SNV+CNV (1%)
15 CI (9%)
two repeat expansion (1%)
121 (88%)
C.Worse, 18 (6) 0 (0) 1 (4) 14 SNV (78%)
1 CNV (6%)
1 SNV+CNV (6%)
two repeat expansion (11%)
7 (64%)

*Successful treatment was defined as reduction >50% in seizure frequency.

ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; CI, chromosomal imbalance; CNV, copy number variant; PM, precision medicine; SNV, single-nucleotide variant.