Table 3.
Deformity location based on the malalignment test [39] with regard to the amount of varus malalignment
Varus malalignment (mFTA) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Mild (3°–5°) | Moderate (6°–8°) | Severe (≥ 9°) | |
Deformity location | |||
Tibial (mMPTA < 85°, mLDFA normal) | 23% | 35% | 33% |
Femoral (mLDFA > 90°, mMPTA normal) | 16% | 31%a | 41%a |
Tibial + femoral (mMPTA < 85° + mLDFA > 90°) | 2% | 3% | 19%b |
No deformity (mMPTA + mLDFA normal) | 58%c | 32%d | 7% |
JLCA | 1.8° ± 1.3° (0.1°–6.4°) | 2.4° ± 1.6e (0.1°–7.7°) | 3.3° ± 1.8e (0.2°–6.8°) |
Normal values for mMPTA and mLDFA were 85°–90° [39, 40]
Values are shown as percentages per group or mean ± standard deviation and range
mFTA mechanical femorotibial angle, mMPTA mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, JLCA joint line convergence angle
aSignificant difference between 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p = 0.016) and between 3°–5° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p = 0.008) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)
bSignificant difference compared to 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)
cSignificant difference compared to 6°–8° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p < 0.001) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)
dSignificant difference compared to ≥ 9° mFTA (p = 0.034) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)
eSignificant difference between 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p = 0.002) and between 3°–5° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p < 0.001) (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction)