Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;29(10):3299–3309. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06166-3

Table 3.

Deformity location based on the malalignment test [39] with regard to the amount of varus malalignment

Varus malalignment (mFTA)
Mild (3°–5°) Moderate (6°–8°) Severe (≥ 9°)
Deformity location
 Tibial (mMPTA < 85°, mLDFA normal) 23% 35% 33%
 Femoral (mLDFA > 90°, mMPTA normal) 16% 31%a 41%a
 Tibial + femoral (mMPTA < 85° + mLDFA > 90°) 2% 3% 19%b
 No deformity (mMPTA + mLDFA normal) 58%c 32%d 7%
JLCA 1.8° ± 1.3° (0.1°–6.4°) 2.4° ± 1.6e (0.1°–7.7°) 3.3° ± 1.8e (0.2°–6.8°)

Normal values for mMPTA and mLDFA were 85°–90° [39, 40]

Values are shown as percentages per group or mean ± standard deviation and range

mFTA mechanical femorotibial angle, mMPTA mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, JLCA joint line convergence angle

aSignificant difference between 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p = 0.016) and between 3°–5° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p = 0.008) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)

bSignificant difference compared to 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)

cSignificant difference compared to 6°–8° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p < 0.001) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)

dSignificant difference compared to ≥ 9° mFTA (p = 0.034) (Qui-square test followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction)

eSignificant difference between 3°–5° and 6°–8° mFTA (p = 0.002) and between 3°–5° and ≥ 9° mFTA (p < 0.001) (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction)