Table 3.

Weighted Adjusted Logistic Regression for the Relationship between Food Insecurity and Glycemic Control (above 7% vs 7% or less)

	Diagnosed Diabetes		Undiagnosed Diabetes
	Odds Ratio	P Value	Odds Ratio	P Value
Household food security		0.0437		0.0289
Food security	Ref		Ref
Food insecurity	1.25(1.01 – 1.55)		1.80(1.06 – 3.06)
Sex		0.0006		0.0090
Male	Ref		Ref
Female	0.76(0.65 – 0.89)		0.61(0.43 – 0.88)
Age group		0.0053		0.1331
20–39	Ref		Ref
40–54	1.34(0.96 – 1.88)		0.97(0.50 – 1.89)
55–69	1.15(0.82 – 1.62)		0.62(0.33 – 1.17)
70 +	0.87(0.60 – 1.26)		0.58(0.28 – 1.23)
Race		0.0006		0.0190
Non-Hispanic White	Ref		Ref
Non-Hispanic Black	1.32(1.10 – 1.60)		0.76(0.45 – 1.29)
Hispanic	1.61(1.29 – 2.02)		1.56(0.90 – 2.70)
Other Minority	1.16(0.85 – 1.59)		1.64(0.81 – 3.30)
Education level		0.0870		0.5093
No degree	Ref		Ref
High school diploma/GED	1.02(0.82 – 1.27)		0.80(0.44 – 1.43)
Some college	0.91(0.72 – 1.16)		1.15(0.69 – 1.93)
College graduate	0.72(0.55 – 0.93)		0.87(0.43 – 1.77)
Marital status		0.8076		0.2747
Married/Partnered	Ref		Ref
Widowed	0.92(0.74 – 1.15)		1.25(0.60 – 2.63)
Divorced/Separated	0.93(0.77 – 1.13)		0.89(0.47 – 1.69)
Never married	0.97(0.72 – 1.31)		1.71(0.94 – 3.13)
Ratio of family income to poverty		0.5634		0.6019
Ratio increase of 1	1.02(0.95 – 1.09)		0.96(0.81 – 1.13)
Access to health care		0.1148		0.0210
No	Ref		Ref
Yes	0.70(0.45 – 1.09)		0.53(0.31 – 0.91)
Data release cycle		0.9769		0.8503
NHANES 2003–2004	Ref		Ref
NHANES 2005–2006	0.88(0.60 – 1.30)		1.69(0.81 – 3.52)
NHANES 2007–2008	0.92(0.63 – 1.36)		1.17(0.60 – 2.26)
NHANES 2009–2010	0.90(0.60 – 1.35)		0.99(0.52 – 1.88)
NHANES 2011–2012	0.98(0.69 – 1.39)		1.24(0.57 – 2.68)
NHANES 2013–2014	1.02(0.71 – 1.47)		1.18(0.65 – 2.14)
NHANES 2015–2016	0.97(0.67 – 1.42)		1.08(0.53 – 2.19)