Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Mar 23;34(3):1104–1114. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001832

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics and Measures (Study 1)

Sample N Grade level % male % Asian % Black % Latinx % White Location Depressive symptoms Psychological distress

Study 1a
1 142 9 53 0 0 0 100 Finland CDI ---
2 191 9 30 27 16 26 6 CA CDI ---
3 262 9–10 53 7 6 54 15 CA CDI:S PSS
4 320 9 52 46 2 15 44 CA CDI:S PSS
5 237 9 46 10 5 73 9 CA CDI:S PSS
6 434 9 47 1 3 35 50 TX CDI:S PSS
7 300 9 50 20 1 16 51 CA CDI:S PSS
8 271 9 39 15 15 20 55 CA CDI:S, QID PSS
9 221 9 45 21 2 13 58 TX CDI PSS
10 724 9 43 9 4 22 47 TX CDI PSS
11 703 9 36 3 3 33 14 TX CDI:S PSS
Study 1b 3,105 9 49 7 9 12 52 USA CDI PSS

Note. CA = California, USA. TX = Texas. CDI = 26-item version of Children’s Depression Inventory (Kovacs, 1985). CDI:S = 10-item short version of Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI:S; Kovacs, 1992). QID = Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QID-SR; Rush et al., 2003). PSS = Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983).

All studies measured implicit theories of personality using 3–4 items assessing participants’ implicit theories about social trait (e.g., “Bullies and victims are types of people who really can’t be changed,” “Some people are just jerks, and not much can be done to change them.”).