Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Mar 23;34(3):1104–1114. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001832

Table 3.

The Path Coefficients for the Association of Entity Theory of Personality to Internalizing Symptoms

Variable b SE 95% CI

Person-level (level 2)
Fixed trait attribution
 Entity theory .25** .08 [.09, .42]
 Baseline internalizing symptomsa .36*** .06 [.24, .48]
Threat appraisals
 Fixed trait attribution .26*** .05 [.16, .35]
 Baseline internalizing symptomsa .39*** .05 [.29, .48]
Internalizing symptoms
 Threat appraisals .12*** .03 [.07, .17]
 Baseline internalizing symptoms .16*** .02 [.12, .21]
Day-level (level 1)
Threat appraisals
 Daily stressor intensity .32*** .08 [.18, .47]
Random slope .06* .03 [.01, .12]
 fixed trait attribution

Note. N = 510 (3,199 daily reports). All independent variables are listed with a left indentation under each corresponding dependent variable. Standardized coefficients were not calculated because the random effects model assumes no single variance/covariance matrix for the entire sample. Dummy-coded day variables were included as covariates (Reference day = Monday) to control for the potential day-of-the-week effect (Chow, Ram, Boker, Fujita, & Clore, 2005).

a

covariance path.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.