Table 3.
Variable | b | SE | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Person-level (level 2) | |||
Fixed trait attribution | |||
Entity theory | .25** | .08 | [.09, .42] |
Baseline internalizing symptomsa | .36*** | .06 | [.24, .48] |
Threat appraisals | |||
Fixed trait attribution | .26*** | .05 | [.16, .35] |
Baseline internalizing symptomsa | .39*** | .05 | [.29, .48] |
Internalizing symptoms | |||
Threat appraisals | .12*** | .03 | [.07, .17] |
Baseline internalizing symptoms | .16*** | .02 | [.12, .21] |
Day-level (level 1) | |||
Threat appraisals | |||
Daily stressor intensity | .32*** | .08 | [.18, .47] |
Random slope | .06* | .03 | [.01, .12] |
fixed trait attribution |
Note. N = 510 (3,199 daily reports). All independent variables are listed with a left indentation under each corresponding dependent variable. Standardized coefficients were not calculated because the random effects model assumes no single variance/covariance matrix for the entire sample. Dummy-coded day variables were included as covariates (Reference day = Monday) to control for the potential day-of-the-week effect (Chow, Ram, Boker, Fujita, & Clore, 2005).
covariance path.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.