Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD002946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002946.pub2

1. Methodological quality assessment.

Study Method of allocation concealment described and appropriate Study described as 'randomized' Method of randomization described and appropriate Study described as 'double blind' Method of blinding described and appropriate # and reason for withdrawals described in each group
Cibere 2004 M M M M M M
Clegg 2006 M M M M M NM
Crolle 1980 NM M NM M M NM
D'ambrosio 1981 NM M NM M M NM
Drovanti 1980 NM M NM M M NM
Herrero‐Beaumont 2007 M M M M M M
Houpt 1999 M M NM M M NM
Hughes 2002 M M M M M M
McAlindon 2004 M M M M M M
Mehta 2007 NM M NM M M M
Muller‐FassBender 94 M M M M M M
Noack 1994 M M M M M M
Pavelka 2002 M M M M M M
Pujalte 1980 NM M NM M M M
Qiu 1998 NM M NM M M M
Qiu 2005 NM M NM NM NM M
Reginster 2001 M M M M NM M
Reichelt 1994 NM M NM M M M
Rindone 2000 NM M M M NM NM
Rovati 1997 M M M M M M
Rozendaal 2008 M M M M M M
Usha 2004 NM M NM M M M
Vajaradul 1981 NM M NM M M M
Vaz 1982 NM M NM M NM M
Zenk 2002 M M NM M M M

M = criteria met; NM = criteria not met