Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2021 Feb 4;117:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106852

Table 6.

Test of Measurement Invariance for 2-factor form of the PBSM.

Model fit within groups for gender

χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR
Men 130.42** 64 0.889 0.865 0.088* (0.066, 0.110) 0.068
Women 181.77** 64 0.894 0.871 0.080** (0.066, 0.093) 0.060
Model fit within groups for gender
White 127.7** 64 0.883 0.858 0.078* (0.058, 0.098) 0.068
Ethnic Minority 186.5** 64 0.897 0.864 0.086** (0.072, 0.100) 0.059
Measurement Invariance Across Gender
χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR ΔCFI ΔTLI ΔRMSEA Δχ2
Configural 312.19** 128 0.892 0.868 0.082** (0.071, 0.084) 0.063
Metric 330.07** 139 0.888 0.874 0.080** (0.069, 0.092) 0.07 Configural vs Metric 0.0040 −0.006 0.002 17.88
Scalar 348.99** 150 0.883 0.879 0.079** (0.068, 0.090) 0.073 Metric vs. Scalar 0.0046 −0.005 0.01 18.93
Strict Factorial 387.49** 163 0.868 0.874 0.081** (0.070, 0.091) 0.076 Scalar vs. Strict 0.0149 0.005 −0.002 38.5**
Measurement Invariance Across Race
χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR ΔCFI ΔTLI ΔRMSEA Δχ2
Configural 314.20** 128 0.892 0.869 0.083** (0.071, 0.095) 0.062
Metric 319.74** 139 0.896 0.883 0.078** (0.067, 0.090) 0.064 Configural vs Metric −0.0031 −0.014 0.005 5.51
Scalar 328.08** 150 0.897 0.893 0.075** (0.064, 0.086) 0.065 Metric vs. Scalar −0.0015 −0.01 0.003 8.36
Strict Factorial 376.43** 163 0.894 0.898 0.073** (0.062, 0.084) 0.068 Scalar vs. Strict 0.0032 −0.005 0.002 18.68
*

p < .05,

**

p < .001