TABLE 2.
SltF activity in the absence or presence of rod proteins and scaffolding protein FlgJ
| Sample | ΔOD λ450 nm/s (×10−5) | ±SD (×10−6) | Significancea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buffer | –1.35 | 1.48 | *** |
| SltF | –3.37 | 2.34 | |
| SltF+FlgJ | –1.03 | 3.69 | *** |
| SltF+FliE | –3.54 | 5.62 | NS |
| SltF+FlgB | –11.9 | 5.12 | *** |
| SltF+FlgC | –3.58 | 3.64 | NS |
| SltF+FlgF | –3.60 | 2.19 | NS |
| SltF+FlgG | –3.47 | 1.00 | NS |
| SltF+FliE+FlgJ | –3.38 | 4.78 | NS |
| SltF+FlgB+FlgJ | –11.2 | 10.3 | *** |
| SltF+FlgC+FlgJ | –3.39 | 1.14 | NS |
| SltF+FlgF+FlgJ | –3.32 | 3.94 | NS |
| SltF+FlgG+FlgJ | –3.53 | 0.762 | NS |
a
That is, the relationship between the SltF ΔOD and the different samples. ***, P < 0.001; NS, no statistical significance.