Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 23;2021(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3

Torbeyns 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Participants Student inclusion criteria: Grades 3 and 4 of high school in Ninove, Belgium
Student exclusion criteria:
Setting: school
Age group: adolescents
Gender distribution: females and males
Country/Countries where trial was performed: Belgium
Interventions Intervention: students were instructed to cycle on a height‐adjustable cycling desk (LifeSpan C3‐DT5 Bike Desk) for 4 class hours/week (4 × 50 min). Participants were free to adjust the cycling intensity to their preference. All participants were asked to not change their lifestyle during the study (e.g. PA levels outside the classroom)
Comparator: asked to not change their lifestyle during the study (e.g. PA levels outside the classroom)
Duration of intervention: 22 weeks
Duration of follow‐up: 22 weeks
Number of schools: 1
Theoretical framework: —
Outcomes Fitness
BMI
Study registration
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding: other funding (no sources of funding received)
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal
Stated aim for study "Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the impact of providing cycling desks in a classroom for 5 months on energy expenditure, physical health parameters, cognitive performance, brain functioning and educational measures in an adolescent population"
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Comment: participants not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Anthropometrics, Fitness High risk Quote from publication: "7 more participants (4 intervention, 3 control) were excluded because they were absent for more than 1 week during the intervention period"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no protocol referenced