Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 23;2021(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3

Bayne‐Smith 2004.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Participants Student inclusion criteria: urban, multi‐ethnic teenaged girls, aged 14 to 19 years
Student exclusion criteria:
Setting: school, urban
Age group: adolescents
Gender distribution: females
Country/Countries where trial was performed: USA
Interventions Intervention: the Physical Activity and Teenage Health curriculum was taught as a personal wellness course that integrated vigorous exercise, health and nutrition education, and behaviour modification. Physical Activity and Teenage Health student manuals were developed to provide students with information about anatomy and physiology of the heart, cardiovascular risk factors, the heart disease process, proper exercise and nutrition, stress management, cigarette smoking avoidance and cessation techniques, and strategies for modifying high‐risk health behaviours. Physical Activity and Teenage Health teacher manuals were provided to PE teachers containing instructions for teaching the programme curriculum and assessing outcomes. PE teachers using the Physical Activity and Teenage Health curriculum received in‐service training from the investigation team before and during the intervention. The Physical Activity and Teenage Health programme consisted of 30‐minute classes conducted 5 days/week for 12 weeks. Individual classes began with a 5‐ to 10‐minute lecture and discussion featuring a topic on cardiovascular health and fitness and suggestions for modifying health behaviours. In addition, students frequently were given homework assignments designed to enhance or clarify lecture material through use of Physical Activity and Teenage Health manuals. Lecture and discussion were followed by 20 to 25 minutes of vigorous PA in the form of resistance exercise to improve muscular strength and endurance or aerobic exercise to improve cardiovascular fitness. Students alternated resistance and aerobic training each day. Resistance exercise consisted of a vigorous programme of circuit weight training at a variety of isotonic and isokinetic exercise stations. Students performed 90‐ to 120‐second bouts of weight lifting at 50% to 70% of the 1‐repetition maximum (maximum resistance that can be lifted 1 time). Aerobic training included a variety of vigorous exercises, such as stationary bicycling, stair stepping, rope jumping, fast walking, jogging, step aerobics, and aerobic dance. Students were instructed to exercise continuously at 70% to 85% of their age‐predicted maximum heart rate. Students were taught how to self‐monitor heart rates during or immediately upon cessation of exercise by palpation of the radial or carotid pulse
Comparator: frequency and duration of traditional PE classes were identical to those of Physical Activity and Teenage Health classes. Because PE classes did not include lecture and discussion, they had approximately 5 minutes more PA/class than Physical Activity and Teenage Health classes
Duration of intervention: 12 weeks
Duration of follow‐up: 12 weeks
Number of schools: 3
Theoretical framework: —
Outcomes BMI
Fitness
Study registration
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding: other funding (Professional Staff Congress ‐ City University of New York, Faculty Research Awards Program, Research Foundation of City University of New York; Department of Health, State of New York; and Operation Fitkids, Inc.)
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal
Stated aim for study "We sought to assess the effects of a school based intervention program of vigorous exercise integrated with health and nutrition education promoting behavioral change in cardiovascular disease risk factors, heart health knowledge, and fitness levels among urban, multiethnic teenaged girls"
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomisation process not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: all participants were allocated at a single point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment, allocation was not known
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given; likely not done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given; likely not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Anthropometrics, Fitness Unclear risk Comment: incomplete outcome data not addressed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no protocol paper or trial registry