Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2021 Sep 13;17(9):e1009927. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009927

Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology

Salimata Bagayoko 1, Stephen Adonai Leon-Icaza 1,#, Miriam Pinilla 1,#, Audrey Hessel 1,#, Karin Santoni 1, David Péricat 1, Pierre-Jean Bordignon 1, Flavie Moreau 1,2, Elif Eren 1, Aurélien Boyancé 1, Emmanuelle Naser 1,3, Lise Lefèvre 4, Céline Berrone 1,2, Nino Iakobachvili 5, Arnaud Metais 1, Yoann Rombouts 1, Geanncarlo Lugo-Villarino 1, Agnès Coste 4, Ina Attrée 6, Dara W Frank 7, Hans Clevers 8, Peter J Peters 5, Céline Cougoule 1, Rémi Planès 1,¤,*, Etienne Meunier 1,¤,*
Editor: Gregory P Priebe9
PMCID: PMC8460005  PMID: 34516571

Abstract

Regulated cell necrosis supports immune and anti-infectious strategies of the body; however, dysregulation of these processes drives pathological organ damage. Pseudomonas aeruginosa expresses a phospholipase, ExoU that triggers pathological host cell necrosis through a poorly characterized pathway. Here, we investigated the molecular and cellular mechanisms of ExoU-mediated necrosis. We show that cellular peroxidised phospholipids enhance ExoU phospholipase activity, which drives necrosis of immune and non-immune cells. Conversely, both the endogenous lipid peroxidation regulator GPX4 and the pharmacological inhibition of lipid peroxidation delay ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and improve bacterial elimination in vitro and in vivo. Our findings also pertain to the ExoU-related phospholipase from the bacterial pathogen Burkholderia thailandensis, suggesting that exploitation of peroxidised phospholipids might be a conserved virulence mechanism among various microbial phospholipases. Overall, our results identify an original lipid peroxidation-based virulence mechanism as a strong contributor of microbial phospholipase-driven pathology.

Author summary

Although a proper activation of various regulated cell necrosis confer a significant advantage against various infectious agents, their dysregulation drives host tissue damages that can end up with fatal sepsis. Specifically, 30% of the bacterial strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) express the phospholipase A2-like toxin ExoU that is injected into host target cells through the Type-3 Secretion System. This toxin induces, through a yet unknown mechanism, a strong and fast necrotic cell death that supports fatal respiratory infections. Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine the cellular mechanisms by which ExoU triggers host cell necrosis. In this context, we found that ExoU exploits basal cellular phospholipid peroxidation to promote cell necrosis. Mechanistically, host cell lipid peroxidation stimulates ExoU phospholipase activity, which then triggers a pathological cell necrosis both in vitro and in vivo. Altogether, our results unveil that targeting host cell lipid peroxidation constitutes a virulence mechanism developed by microbial phospholipases, a process that contributes to P. aeruginosa-mediated pathology.

Introduction

Regulated cell necrosis (RCNs) drives physiological and immune processes, yet dysregulation of this process promotes pathological responses such as organ-failure and sepsis [14]. Mechanistically, oxygen-dependent cell death is an evolutionary conserved process that involves the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), transition metals (e.g. iron) and peroxidised lipid accumulation [58]. In addition to cell necrosis, lipid peroxidation broadly involves cellular processes essential to mediate optimal efferocytosis of dead cells, cellular communication resulting from the formation of lipids derived from peroxided phospholipids (e.g. isoprostanes, platelet activating factor) or the production of bioactive lipids (eicosanoids) from arachidonic acid [9,10]. In addition, the peroxidation of the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin initiates apoptosis while the accumulation of peroxidised phosphatidyl ethanolamines (PE) promote the cellular necrosis, ferroptosis [1117]. Specifically, the dysregulation of lipid peroxidation processes is associated with various human pathologies such as cancer chemoresistance, brain and ischemia injuries, neurological alterations, metabolic diseases as well as tuberculosis susceptibility [1823]. In this context, the enzymes glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and ferroptosis-suppressor protein-1 (FSP1) that belongs to the CoQ antioxidant system, detoxify phospholipid hydroperoxide accumulation, hence allowing lipid peroxide amounts to be balanced in cells [5,11,12,14,24]. On the contrary, iron excess, lipoxygenase activity or cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CYPOR) all promote phospholipid peroxidation, which can end with ferroptosis induction in the absence of proper regulation [5,1416,25,26].

In this regard, the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) expresses ExoU, an A2 phospholipase from the patatin family, that triggers a necrosis-dependent pathology through a poorly understood pathway [2736]. In presence of cellular co-factors such as ubiquitin [31] or the trafficking chaperone DNAJC5 [37], ExoU activity rapidly cleaves at the sn-2 position of host membrane phospholipids, liberating large amounts of arachidonic acid that are then metabolized into eicosanoids by cellular enzymes cyclooxygenases, cytochrome P450 or lipoxygenases [32,3840]. Importantly, in vivo, ExoU expression by P. aeruginosa is associated with a robust production of oxidized lipids such the platelet activating factor (PAF) or isoprostanes [38,41]. In this context, we explored the possibility that P. aeruginosa ExoU mediates a necrosis-dependent host pathology involving lipid peroxidation.

Results

P. aeruginosa infection triggers ExoU-dependent alarmin and peroxidised lipid production in mice

P. aeruginosa ExoU is injected into cells by the Type-3 Secretion System (T3SS) [28,36], which triggers a fast and violent cellular necrosis. Therefore, we first monitored the profile of ExoU-dependent pathology in mice infected with the clinical isolate PP34 exoU+ or its isogenic mutant (exoU-). Similar to previous studies [27,29,42,43], intranasal instillation with either exoU+ or exoU- strains highlighted a P. aeruginosa-induced acute pathology mainly due to ExoU, as mice infected with exoU- bacteria showed improved survival to infection (Fig 1A). This observation was paralleled with lower bacterial loads of P. aeruginosa exoU- than exoU+ in the bronchoalveaolar lavage fluids (BALFs), the lungs, the blood and the spleen, suggesting that ExoU also promotes bacterial dissemination (Fig 1B). As P. aeruginosa triggers NLRC4-, NLRP3- and Caspase-11-dependent inflammasome response [42,44,4552,53], we infected inflammasome-deficient mice (Casp1/Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and GasderminD-/-) and observed that those mice were not protected against P. aeruginosa exoU+, hence suggesting that ExoU-promoted mouse pathology occurs independently from the inflammasome machineries (S1A and S1B Fig). A hallmark of host cell necrosis is the release of intracellular mediators such as alarmins that contribute to the initiation and the development of an inflammatory reaction, which occurs upon P. aeruginosa infection [42,54]. Therefore, we primarily focused our analysis on alarmin release. We observed a strong ExoU-dependent alarmin production in BALFs 6 h after infection, such as IL-1 family alarmins IL1α, IL-33 or IL-36γ [55] (Fig 1C). In addition, we also detected that exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa triggered a strong production of phospholipid- and arachidonic acid (aa)-derived mediators such as prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4, which correlates with the robust phospholipase activity of ExoU (Fig 1D) [3840]. Importantly, BALFs of mice infected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa also exhibited a marked presence of oxidized lipid (by)-products such as isoprostanes (8-iso PGF2α) or Malondialdehyde (MDA), which suggests that exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa also drives an exacerbated lipid oxidation response in mice (Fig 1E) [41,56].

Fig 1. ExoU-dependent lung pathology in mice associates to an alarmin and peroxidized lipid signature.

Fig 1

(A) Survival of WT mice intranasally infected (n = 7 animals per condition) with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Graphs represent one experiment (8 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. Log-rank Cox-Mantel test was used for survival comparisons. ***p ≤ 0.001. (B) Bronchoalveolar (BAL), lung, blood and spleen bacterial loads from WT mice (n = 8) 18 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Graphs represent one experiment (8 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. (C) Alarmin levels in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) from WT mice (n = 8) 6 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Graphs represent one experiment (8 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. (D) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) levels in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) from WT mice (n = 8) 6 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Graphs represent one experiment (8 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. (E) Peroxidized lipid product (isoprostanes and MDA) levels in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) from WT mice (n = 8) 6 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Graphs represent one experiment (8 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. Data information: Data shown as means (Graphs B-E) and are representative of one experiment performed three times; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, Mann-Whitney analysis test (B-E) and log-rank Cox-Mantel test for survival comparisons (A).

Lipid peroxidation contributes to ExoU-induced cell necrosis and P. aeruginosa escape from phagocyte-mediated killing

The observation that exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa infection associates to a lipid peroxidation signature in vivo, encouraged us to determine the importance of lipid peroxidation on ExoU-induced cellular necrosis. As P. aeruginosa strains that do not express ExoU can promote an NLRC4 inflammasome response in macrophages [50], we used mouse Bone-Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMDMs) that lack Nlrc4 expression to specifically address the importance of lipid peroxidation on ExoU-dependent cell necrosis. We infected Nlrc4-/- primary murine BMDMs with P. aeruginosa strains expressing or not expressing ExoU. The pharmacological inhibition of various regulated necrosis pathways (e.g. pyroptosis, necroptosis, apoptosis, parthanatos) showed that only ferrostatin-1, a potent and well characterized inhibitor of phospholipid peroxidation [57], repressed ExoU-dependent cell necrosis (Figs 2A and 2B and S2A and S1S6 Movies). Ferrostatin-1 action was specific to lipid peroxidation-dependent cell necrosis as it also inhibited Cumene hydroperoxide-induced ferroptosis (CuOOH, 400μM) but not Flagellin-/LPS-induced pyroptosis or TCPA-1/Z-VAD/TNFα-dependent necroptosis (Fig 2B). In addition, ExoU-induced IL-1α and HMGB1 alarmin release in macrophages was reduced in presence of ferrostatin-1 whereas TNFα levels remained similar (Fig 2C), suggesting that lipid peroxidation contributes to alarmin release in response to ExoU. We noticed that ExoU-triggered ferrostatin-1-sensitive necrosis was not restricted to murine BMDMs as primary human macrophages, the human U937 monocytic cell line, human and murine neutrophils and eosinophils, the human bronchial epithelial (HBEs), A549 or HeLa epithelial cells were all sensitive to lipid peroxidation inhibition upon infection with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (S2A and S2B Fig). ExoU exhibits a calcium-independent phospholipase A2-like activity [33]. Hence, we transfected recombinant ExoU protein (rExoU) or its enzymatically inactive mutant ExoUS142A [58] in WT BMDMs and monitored for cell necrosis. Only macrophages transfected with active ExoU underwent to cell death, a process that was inhibited by the use of ferrostatin-1 or the phospholipase inhibitor MAFP (S2C Fig). In line, we found that ferrostatin-1 itself did not alter bacterial growth or ExoU secretion (S2D and S2E Fig), suggesting that ferrostatin-1 does not directly alter bacterial physiology nor expression/secretion of ExoU. Upon phospholipase activation arachidonic acid release can be metabolized and oxidized by various cellular enzymes, including cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 (COX1, COX2), lipoxygenases (ALOX5 and ALOX12/15 in mice) or cytochrome p450 (CYPs) enzymes. Therefore, we transfected recombinant ExoU in WT, Alox5-/- or Alox12/15-/- BMDMs in presence or absence of various COX, CYP or different lipid peroxidation inhibitors (a-tocopherol, liproxstatin-1, Resveratrol, ferrostatin-1). Although we observed that all lipid peroxidation inhibitors have a strong inhibitory impact on cell death, cyclooxygenase, cytochrome P450 or lipoxygenase targeting did not interfere with ExoU-dependent cell necrosis, hence suggesting that those enzymes do not regulate lipid-peroxidation-dependent cell necrosis upon ExoU exposure (Fig 2D). Importantly, we also observed that ferrostatin-1 delayed ExoU-induced cell necrosis, suggesting either that the phospholipase activity of ExoU promotes lipid peroxidation-independent cell death or that the inhibitory effect of ferrostatin-1 is unstable over time (Fig 2E). Regarding this, the replenishment of P. aeruginosa-infected cells with fresh ferrostatin-1 each hour strongly improved cell viability, suggesting that the instability of Fe1 might also account in the delayed ExoU-induced cell necrosis we observed (S2F Fig). Finally, we evaluated if the inhibition of lipid peroxidation would modulate macrophage and neutrophil microbicidal response upon exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa infection. We observed that ferrostatin-1 strongly improved both macrophage and neutrophil microbicidal activities to a level close to those observed in response to exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (Fig 2F), hence suggesting that P. aeruginosa ExoU relies on lipid peroxidation-dependent cell necrosis to escape from phagocyte attack. Together, our results suggest that host cell lipid peroxidation is important for ExoU-induced host cell necrosis and release of alarmins.

Fig 2. Lipid peroxidation inhibition delays ExoU-induced cell necrosis.

Fig 2

Otherwise specified, cells were infected with an MOI of 0.5 of P. aeruginosa PP34, PP34exoU- or PP34exoUS142A for various times. ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. (A) Measure of LDH release in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34 or PP34exoU- in presence of Z-VAD (40μM), olaparaib (10μM), Necrostatin-1s (Ne1s, 40μM) or Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 2 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. (B) Measure of LDH release in WT or Casp1-/-/Casp11-/- BMDMs transfected (Lipofectamin 2000) with 1μg of LPS or Flagellin (Flg) to induce pyroptosis, treated with Z-VAD (40μM)/TNFα (500UI/mL)/TPCA-1 (5 μM) to induce necroptosis or with Cumene hydroperoxide (CuOOH, 400μM) to induce ferroptosis in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 6 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. (C) Measure of alarmin/cytokine release in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34 or PP34exoU- in presence of Z-VAD (40μM), olaparaib (10μM), Necrostatin-1s (Ne1s, 40μM) or Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 2 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. (D) Heat map representing measure of LDH release in WT, ALOX5-/- and ALOX12/15 BMDMs transfected with recombinant ExoU in presence/absence of Cox1 inhibitor (Ketorolac Tromethamine, 10μM), Cox2 inhibitor (NS 398, 25μM), Cyp450 epoxygenase activity inhibitor (PPOH, 10μM), phospholipase inhibitor MAFP (50μM) or lipid peroxidation inhibitors Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 20μM), Resveratrol (5μM), Liproxstatin-1 (30μM), a-Tocopherol (20μM) for 2 hours. The heat map shows the mean of three combined independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (E) Time course measure of plasma membrane permeabilization using propidium iodide incorporation in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34 or PP34exoUS142A in presence/absence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 20μM). ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. (F) Microbicidal activity of macrophages (5h) and neutrophils (3h) after infection with P. aeruginosa exoU+ and exoU- (MOI 0.5) in presence/absence of ferrostatin-1 (10μM). ***p ≤ 0.001, t-test with Bonferroni correction. Data information: Data are represented as means +/- SEM (graphs A- F) from n = 3 independent pooled experiments; ***P ≤ 0.001 for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction.

Lipid peroxidation fuels ExoU phospholipase activity

Lipid-peroxidation requires reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H2O2, that can oxidize various phospholipids [5]. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of ExoU to induce ROS-dependent lipid peroxidation in macrophages. Although we observed that, 30 minutes after transfection, ExoU but not its catalytically inactivated mutant ExoUS142A, triggered an acute ROS production in BMDMs, we surprisingly failed to detect a robust lipid peroxidation accumulation as measured by the C11 Bodipy probe (Figs 3A and S3A and S3B). As control, the well-known lipid peroxidation inducer Cumene hydroperoxide (CuOOH) promoted cellular lipid peroxidation (Fig 3A) [59]. In contrast, we observed that basal lipid peroxidation in cells was reduced upon ExoU transfection or PP34 infection, a process that was further strengthened in presence of ferrostatin-1 (Figs 3A and S3B).

Fig 3. ExoU-induced cell death involves ROS-induced lipid peroxidation but proceeds in a ferroptosis independent manner.

Fig 3

(A) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phospho)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT BMDMs treated with CuOOH (20μM) or transfected with rExoU (500ng) or its catalytically dead mutant rExoUS142A (500ng) for 1 hour in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM). Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graphs shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. **P≤0.001, ***P ≤ 0.001 for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (B) (Redox) lipidomic analysis of phospholipid peroxidation in BMDMs transfected with recombinant ExoU or its catalytically dead mutant ExoUS142A for 45 minutes. Each value is standardized to the corresponding phospholipid content shown in (S3B Fig). The heat map shows the mean of one experiment performed in triplicate. (C) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phosphor)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then transfected with rExoU (500ng) for 1 hour. Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graphs shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. *P ≤ 0.05, **P≤0.001, for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (D) Measure of LDH release in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then transfected with rExoU (500ng) for 3 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (E) Representative microscopy images (phospho)lipid peroxidation and quantifications using the probe C11-bodipy in CuOOH-primed (20μM) HELA cells infected with PP34 (MOI5) for 2 hours. Images show two independent experiments, each performed three times at 2 hours post infection. Scale bar 20μm; Green, oxidized bodipy (oxidized phospholipids, PLs ox); Red, bodipy (phospholipids, PLs); Blue (Endoplasmic Reticulum, ER tracker probe, 1μM). Arrows show enriched peroxidised phospholipids in the plasma membrane area. Quantifications show the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) quantification of Peroxidized lipids from one experiment performed three times (50–60 cells counted). ***P<0.001 by T-test. (F) Measure of LDH release in immortalized (i) WT or Cypor-/- BMDMs primed or not with CuOOH (20μM, 1hour) in presence or absence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and infected for 2 hours with PP34. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (G) Time course measure of plasma membrane permeabilization using propidium iodide incorporation in WT and Cypor-/- HELA cells primed or not with CuOOH (20μM, 1hour) and infected with PP34 (MOI5) for 2 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (H) Time course measure of plasma membrane permeabilization using propidium iodide incorporation in immortalised WT and Gpx4-/- BMDMs transfected with rExoU (500ng) for 7 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (I) ExoU phospholipase activity determination in WT BMDM lysates pre-treated or not with CuOOH (20μM, 1hour). 100 pmols of ExoU were used and phospholipase hydrolysis rate (nmoles of substrate hydrolysed/nmole of ExoU) was measured after 4 h and 16 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (J) Measure of LDH release in WT BMDMs primed or not with CuOOH (20μM, 1hour) in presence or absence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and transfected for 3 hours with 5μg of rExoUBtU or 500ng rExoU. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. Data information: Data are plotted as means+/- SEM (D, F-J) from n = 3 independent pooled experiments; ***P ≤ 0.001 for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction.

These results suggest that, instead of promoting pathological lipid peroxidation, ExoU might actually use cellular lipid peroxidation to promote cell necrosis. To this regard, various host phospholipase A2 enzymes have been described to specifically cleave and remove peroxidised phospholipids from membranes [6062]. To address this hypothesis, we performed a redox phospholipidomic approach to determine if ExoU could interfere with the endogenous levels of peroxidised phospholipids (Figs 3B and S3C). We used a 45 min time-point to perform our experiments, as a point where plasma membrane permeabilization (propidium uptake monitoring) is not observed. This design excludes the possibility that a decrease in peroxidised phospholipids is due to cell necrosis induced by ExoU (S3D Fig). We observed that ExoU-treated macrophages had a decrease in peroxidised phospholipids as measured by the reduction in hydroperoxil (-OOH)- and hydroxyl (-OH)-phosphoinositols (PIs)/- phosphoserines (PSs) and—phosphocholines (PCs) with arachidonic acid (C20:4/C22:4) acid side chains (Figs 3B and S3C).

In cells, peroxidised phospholipids are detoxified by various factors, one of the most important being the ferroptosis regulator glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) [5]. Consequently, the use of pro oxidant molecules or Gpx4 genetic inactivation both induce a strong accumulation of various peroxidised phospholipids in cell membranes [5]. Therefore, we hypothesized that prestimulation of macrophages with non-cytotoxic doses of the lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis inducer Cumene hydroperoxide (20μM, 1h) might sensitize cells to ExoU-induced cell necrosis. We transfected recombinant (r)ExoU in WT BMDMs in presence or absence of non-toxic doses of the pro-oxidant Cumen hydroperoxide (CuOOH, 20μM, 1h) [59]. Although CuOOH promoted lipid peroxidation but not BMDM cell death, rExoU transfection specifically induced an increased cell necrosis in CuOOH-primed BMDMs, a process that was inhibited by the use of ferrostatin-1 (Fig 3C and 3D). In agreement with this result, we measured a strong decrease in lipid peroxidation in CuOOH-primed cells transfected with rExoU (Fig 3C and 3D), confirming that ExoU efficiently targeted lipid peroxides induced by CuOOH. In addition, microscopy observations of CuOOH-primed cells highlighted a decrease of peroxidized lipids at the plasma membrane upon infection by ExoU-expressing strain of P. aeruginosa (PP34), suggesting that ExoU mostly target plasma membrane peroxidized phospholipids to promote cell necrosis (Fig 3E). The enzyme cytochrome p450 oxidoreductase (CYPOR) has recently been found to be an important provider of peroxidized phospholipids upon ferroptosis induction; we hypothesized that ExoU function might be regulated by CYPOR-regulated phospholipid peroxidation. We acquired Cypor-deficient HeLa cells but also generated Cypor-/- immortalized (i)BMDMs using CRISPR (S3E Fig) and evaluated the importance of CYPOR on ExoU-driven cell necrosis. PP34 infection of WT and Cypor-/- immortalized BMDMs triggered similar cell deaths, suggesting that in resting cells, CYPOR does not promote the basal lipid peroxidation involved in ExoU-dependent cell necrosis (Fig 3G and 3H). However, in CuOOH-primed macrophages, where phospholipid peroxidation is induced, we observed that CYPOR was a major contributor of phospholipid peroxidation (S3F Fig). This was associated to enhanced ability of PP34 to trigger cell necrosis in CuOOH-primed WT but not in Cypor-/- iBMDMs and HeLa cells (Fig 3G and 3H), which suggests that CYPOR-induced lipid peroxidation heightens ExoU-dependent toxicity. However, in resting cells, basal lipid peroxidation appears to be regulated by other processes/enzymes. Finally, using Crispr-Cas9, we generated Gpx4-/- immortalized BMDMs (S3G Fig). As previously observed by others in other cell lines [16,24], Gpx4-/- immortalized BMDMs exhibited increased basal levels of peroxidised lipids (S3H Fig). Therefore, rExoU transfection triggered faster cell death of Gpx4-/- macrophages than their WT counterpart, suggesting that lipid peroxidation of cells enhances ExoU-dependent toxicity (Figs 3H and S3G and S3H).

Upon phospholipid peroxidation, arachidonic acid-containing phospholipids form isoprostanes that are potent intra- and extra-cellular inflammatory mediators [9,10]. Once formed, these isoprostanes are released from phospholipids by the action of phospholipases [9,10]. Therefore, we reasoned that if ExoU targets peroxidised phospholipids, this would promote ExoU phospholipase-dependent release of endogenous pre-formed isoprostanes. Accordingly, the release of the 8-PGF2α isoprostane was specifically induced by ExoU in WT macrophages, a process that was further amplified by the co treatment of cells with non-toxic concentrations of Cumen hydroperoxide (CuOOH 20μM, 1 h) and ExoU (S3I Fig). Of importance, ferrostatin-1 strongly inhibited ExoU- and ExoU/CuOOH-induced 8-PGF2α release (S3I Fig). In addition, we also detected that in CuOOH-primed macrophages, the amount of arachidonic acid-derived eicosanoids leukotriene B4 and prostaglandin E2, which are an indirect indication of the phospholipase activity of ExoU, were also strongly increased after the exposure to ExoU, hence suggesting that ExoU-targeted peroxidised phospholipids might increase its phospholipase activity toward all phospholipids (peroxidized or not) (S3J Fig). Consequently, we measured the phospholipase activity of ExoU in cell lysates where we chemically induced non-lethal lipid peroxidation with Cumene hydroperoxide (CuOOH, 20μM) for 1 h or not. We observed that in CuOOH-primed cell lysates, ExoU exhibited a stronger activity than in unprimed samples after 4 h of incubation (Fig 3I). Importantly, after 18 h incubation, we observed the same accumulation of hydrolysed substrate in CuOOH-primed and unprimed samples, which suggests that lipid peroxidation exacerbates the early activation of ExoU (Fig 3I). As control, ExoUS142A- treated cell lysates did not show a significant phospholipase activity induction, suggesting that we mostly measured the PLA2 activity from ExoU, but not from cellular phospholipases (Fig 3I). Finally, we aimed at challenging our findings by determining if other toxic phospholipases also had a similar activation pattern to ExoU. Hence, we transfected macrophages with the closely related patatin-like phospholipase A2 from Burkholderia thailandensis (ExoUBtU) [31]. We observed that recombinant ExoUBtU transfection induced BMDMs necrosis, a process that was exacerbated by CuOOH priming and inhibited by the use of ferrostatin-1, suggesting that ExoUBtU also follows a pattern involving host cell lipid peroxidation (Fig 3J). Altogether, our results suggest a surprising mechanism by which ExoU exploits cellular lipid peroxidation to trigger necrosis, a process that can be extended to the action of B. thailandensis ExoUBtU-related phospholipase.

Ferrostatin-1 improves mouse resistance to infection by exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa

ExoU-induced necrosis promotes host lung pathology, which leads to a sepsis like response as well as respiratory failure syndrome. Therefore, we hypothesized that ferrostatin-1 use could protect mice against exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa. Intranasal infection of mice using P. aeruginosa exoU+ showed that mice intraperitoneally pre-treated with ferrostatin-1 (6 h before infection, 6mg.k-1) had diminished bacterial loads in BALFs, lungs and spleen. Ferrostatin-1 pre-treatment did not significantly modify bacterial loads of exoU-deficient bacteria, suggesting that ferrostatin-1 mainly modulates ExoU-dependent processes in mice (Fig 4A). Similarly, ferrostatin-1 also attenuated ExoU-dependent alarmin release (e.g. IL-36γ, IL33, IL1α) and the level of oxidized lipids (isoprostanes, MDA) in the BALs (Fig 4B and 4C). Additionally, evaluation of the cellular contents in BALFs showed that ferrostatin-1 significantly protected a pool of alveolar macrophage upon P. aeruginosa challenge simultaneously decreasing the number of recruited neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes (Figs 4D and S4A). Although a pathological function of recruited immune cells such as neutrophils is probable, we hypothesize that ferrostatin-1-inhibited resident alveolar macrophage death in response to exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa might confer an improved immune protection characterized by lower immune cell recruitment and lower tissue damages. Regarding this, lung histological observations showed that the inflammatory status of mice infected with non-lethal doses of ExoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (1.105 CFUs) was improved in presence of ferrostatin-1 (Fig 4E). Next, we addressed survival upon ExoU-expressing P. aeruginosa challenge. We observed that ferrostatin-1-treated mice (4–6 h before infection, 6mg.k-1) had an improved survival rate than those treated with PBS after 40 h after infection (Fig 4F). We validated that ferrostatin-1 specifically protected mice against ExoU-induced pathology as ferrostatin-1-treated mice did not show enhanced protection (survival) against ExoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (Fig 4F).

Fig 4. Ferrostatin-1 protects mice against ExoU-induced lung pathology.

Fig 4

(A) Bronchoalveolar (BAL), lung and spleen bacterial loads from WT mice (n = 7/group) 18 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. When specified, mice were intraperitoneally pretreated with ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1 or PBS) 4 hours before intranasal infection. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. NS: Not significant. (B, C) Alarmin and lipid peroxide products levels in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) from WT mice (n = 7 mice/group) 6 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. When specified, mice were intraperitoneally pretreated with ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1 or PBS) 4 hours before intranasal infection. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. (D) Immune cell (CD45+) populations in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) from WT mice (n = 7 mice/group) 6 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. When specified, mice were intraperitoneally treated with ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1 or PBS) 4–6 hours before intranasal infection. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. (E) Histological observation and scoring of bronchial and lung cellular infiltrations upon exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa intranasal infection. When specified, mice were intraperitoneally pretreated with ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1 or PBS) 4–6 hours before intranasal infection. Stars show the cellular infiltrates. *p ≤ 0.05; Mann-Whitney analysis test. (F) Mice survival (n = 7 mice/group) 40 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or its isogenic mutant PP34exoU-. Mice were intraperitoneally pretreated with ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1 or PBS) 4 hours before intranasal infection. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; **p ≤ 0.01, Log-rank Cox-Mantel test was used for survival comparisons. (G, H) Time-lapse microscopy and the associated quantifications of the measure of plasma membrane permeabilization using propidium iodide incorporation in human primary bronchial organoids infected (microinjection) with P. aeruginosa expressing exoU+ or its isogenic mutant (exoU-) in presence or absence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) for 15 hours. Data are plotted as means+/- SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. Data information: Data shown as means (Graphs A-E) and are representative of one experiment performed three times; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test (A-E) and log-rank Cox-Mantel test for survival comparisons (F).

Finally, we aimed to evaluate if P. aeruginosa ExoU would trigger pathological lipid peroxidation-dependent cell necrosis in human bronchial organoids. Organoids were derived from normal lung tissue adjacent to tumors obtained from patients undergoing lung resection due to non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Live cell imaging of organoids microinjected with P. aeruginosa showed that ExoU triggered complete organoid collapse (Fig 4G and S7S12 Movies). Importantly, ferrostatin-1 strongly attenuated P. aeruginosa-dependent organoid damages (Fig 4G and S7S12 Movies). Altogether, our results identified that P. aeruginosa ExoU phospholipase benefits from lipid peroxidation to trigger pathology both in mice and in human bronchial organoids.

Discussion

As a preferential extracellular pathogen, P. aeruginosa uses its Type 3-Secretion System (T3SS) to inject virulence factors (Exo S, T, Y and U), allowing bacterial escape from phagocytic uptake and killing. Although exoS-expressing P. aeruginosa strains associate to the development of chronic infections, exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa triggers acute deadly infections that associate with a strong oxidative imbalance. In this study, we describe that endogenous basal lipid peroxidation contributes to ExoU-dependent cellular toxicity and mouse pathology. Though we do not exclude that in vivo, lipid peroxidation might play various pathological roles that go beyond the sole regulation of cell necrosis, such processes appear to be linked to ExoU expression. In this context, previous studies showed that ExoU promotes production of the platelet-activating factor or the 8-PGF2α isoprostane, two oxidized lipids [41]. In addition, ExoU directly promotes a strong release of arachidonic acid from phospholipids. Enzymes such as cytochrome P450/COXs/LOXs can enzymatically produce oxygenated arachidonic products such as prostaglandin E2/leukotriene B4 involved in pathological signalling pathways upon P. aeruginosa infection [38,40,63]. However, results from others and ours mostly suggest that, taken individually, those enzymes only play a negligible role in ExoU-induced cell necrosis [38,40,63]. Regarding the central cell types involved in ExoU-induced pathology, previous studies identified macrophages and neutrophils as central targets of ExoU injection by P. aeruginosa. Therefore, future studies will be of importance to determine if the respective contribution of each cell type in pathology induced by ExoU-exploited lipid peroxidation. Regarding this, our in vivo observations that targeting lipid peroxidation confers some protection of mice against ExoU-dependent pathology is to put in the light of a decrease in some eicosanoid production such as LTB4 and PGE2, two important modulators of ExoU-driven pathology [38,40,63]. Therefore, the use of Alox5-/- or Cox-/- mice, unable to generate LTB4 or various prostaglandins respectively, will also help to determine the respective importance of eicosanoid burst or cell necrosis upon lipid peroxidation-driven ExoU activity.

Although controlled phospholipid peroxidation is of importance for the cells to perform various processes such as efferocytosis through the engagement of peroxidised-PS, mitochondria-dependent apoptosis through cardiolipin peroxidation, signal transduction through peroxidised PC-derived lipids, unrestricted accumulation of peroxidised PEs drives ferroptosis [9,10,64]. A question in both basal lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis-induced lipid peroxidation lies on the compartment phospholipid peroxidation occurs. Peroxisiomes are key at providing ether-phospholipids that will be peroxidised upon ferroptosis induction, the Endoplasmic reticulum is also a central regulator of phospholipid turn over and plasma membrane constitutes the probable location of lipid peroxidation-driven cell lysis upon ferroptosis induction [16,65,66]. Our observations also suggest that although lipid peroxidation can occur in various cellular compartments, ExoU-induced cell necrosis mostly arises from plasma membrane cleaved peroxidized phospholipids. Yet, this does not exclude at all that phospholipid peroxidation could occur in other intracellular organelles, including the endoplasmic reticulum.

Ferroptosis is thought to be a constitutively activated form of cell death that is kept under control through the activity of endogenous regulators of lipid peroxidation such as GPX4, FSP1-mediated coQ10 production, α-tocopherol (vitamin E). In addition, the host cellular calcium (Ca2+)-independent PLA2γ, the peroriredoxin Prdx6 PLA2 or the PLA2G6 (Ca2+-independent PLA2β) can cleave and remove preferentially peroxidised phospholipids, hence contributing to phospholipid peroxide detoxification [61,62,6771]. It is important to notice that both the iPLA2beta and iPLA2g belong to the patatin-like phospholipase family, as ExoU, which suggests that this family of phospholipases might have some conserved affinities to peroxidzed phospholipids [72]. The activity of those phospholipases is tightly regulated by various cellular systems (e.g. ROS levels, calcium fluxes, phospholipid composition) that ensure an optimal but not dysregulated phospholipid cleavage [71]. To this regard, our findings that cellular phospholipid peroxidation is a strong enhancer of ExoU-induced pathological necrosis appears in first view counter intuitive. In this context, we envision that, as a virulence factor, ExoU activity does not follow host regulation and uses host peroxided phospholipids to boost its patatin-like A2 phospholipase activity allowing to aberrantly target and cleave host (peroxidised) phospholipids. Consequently, the use of lipid peroxidation inhibitors such as resveratrol, liproxstatin-1 or ferrostatin-1 attenuates the potency and the speed of ExoU-induced cell necrosis. This offers a key time window for macrophage and neutrophil-mediated bacterial uptake and killing. Although, the identification of cellular enzymatic systems that promote basal lipid peroxidation remains to be explored and characterized, lipid peroxidation accumulation upon Gpx4 removal or oxidant stress enhances ExoU-induced cellular necrosis. It is intriguing that endogenous peroxidised phospholipids favour ExoU-induced cell necrosis, suggesting that ExoU-expressing strains of P. aeruginosa take advantage of the host ferroptosis pathways to maximally damage host tissues. Hence, oxidant-activated cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase CYPOR, a crucial regulator of ferroptosis, strongly enhanced ExoU-dependent cell necrosis, which suggests a important link between ferroptosis-regulated pathways and ExoU activity. Should other regulators of ferroptosis such as ACSL and LPCAT acyl transferases on ExoU-dependent toxicity warrants further investigations [15].

Phospholipases are also present in venoms or various microbial pathogens (e.g. M. tuberculosis, L. monocytogenes, S. pyogenes) and can also promote fast cell necrosis [7375]. Conversely, we extended our findings to the ExoU closely related ExoUBtU phospholipase from B. thailandensis. Remarkably, snake, scorpion or spider venoms are a complex mixture of various components, including the L-amino acid oxidase, able to generate H2O2-driven lipid peroxidation, and secreted phospholipases able to cleave phospholipids [73]. In this context, it is tempting to speculate that venoms have all components necessary to mediate cell damage in a complex single-injection mixture. L-amino acid oxidase-induced lipid peroxidation might work with venom PLA2 to optimize phospholipid cleavage and subsequent cell necrosis. Related to this, Sevanian and colleagues made pioneer observations that the PLA2 activity from the snake Crotalus adamanteus is exacerbated in contact of liposomes constituted of peroxidised phospholipids, a process that is thought to be due to the better accessibility of the sn2-peroxidized fatty acid to phospholipase [70]. Whether ExoU and its relatives follow a similar pathway of activation will be studied in future studies.

In a broader point of view, it is interesting to note that phospholipases can promote allergic shock associated with a strong release of the allergic alarmin interleukin-33 [76], a signature we also observed in mice infected with ExoU-expressing P. aeruginosa. Should lipid peroxidation be involved in IL33-driven allergy or asthma in response to phospholipases or other allergens (e.g. proteases) [77] will require additional study.

Understanding the mechanisms of regulated cell necrosis and their physio-pathological consequences is currently driving intensive research and debates. While the importance of lipid peroxidation in antigen presentation, anti-cancer treatments or in exacerbating neurodegenerative diseases becomes more and more clear, its function in infectious diseases remains less studied. Regarding this, Dar et al., recently described that, upon chronic infection, secreted P. aeruginosa lipoxygenase (loxA) could sensitize cells to lipid peroxidation-induced ferroptosis [22]. In addition, Kain and colleagues recently linked regulation of host lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis to restriction of liver-stage malaria, which suggests that host peroxidised phospholipids might play yet unsuspected functions in immunity or susceptibility to various pathogens [78]. Thus, our findings that the bacterial patatin-like phospholipase A2 ExoU contributes to pathology by exploiting target cell lipid peroxidation adds an additional piece of significance for the role of lipid peroxidation in infectious diseases but also offers novel insights to target host lipid peroxidation pathways in the frame of infectious diseases (S1 Graphical Abstract).

Material and method

Ethics statements

The use of human cells was performed under the agreement of the Research Ethical Committee, Haute-Garonne, France. Buffy coats came anonymously by the EFS (établissement français du sang, Toulouse, France). For each donor, a written informed consent was obtained according to the EFS contract agreement n° 21PLER2017-0035AV02, according, to “Decret N° 2007–1220 (articles L1243-4, R1243-61)”.

Animal experiments were approved by local (CE01 committee) and national ethic committees (License APAFIS#8521–2017041008135771, Minister of Research, France) and performed according to local guidelines (French ethical laws) and the European Union animal protection directive (Directive 2010/63/EU).

Mice

Nlrc4–/–, Casp1–/–Casp11–/–, GsdmD–/–, ALOX12/15–/–and ALOX5–/–mice were generated and described in previous studies [7982]. Mice were bred at the IPBS (Toulouse, France) animal facilities in agreement to the EU and French directives on animal welfare (Directive 2010/63/EU). Charles Rivers provided WT C57BL/6 mice.

Animal infection models

6–10 mice/group were intranasally infected with 5.105 Colony Forming Units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa PP34 strain (ExoU+) or its isogenic mutant (ExoU-) and animal survival was followed over 40–50 hours after infection. When specified, mice were intraperitoneally treated with 100μL of PBS or ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1) 4–6 hours before intranasal infections with bacterial strains.

Regarding bacterial loads assays, 6–10 mice/group were intranasally infected with 2.105 bacteria for 24 hours, and Bronchoalveaolar (BALs), lung spleen and blood bacterial numbers were evaluated using CFU plating. BAL fluids (BALFs) were also used to address cytokine, alarmin and lipid levels using ELISA, EIA and colorimetric kits. There were no randomization or blinding performed.

Histological experiments and scoring

Mice were intraperitoneally treated with 100μL of PBS or ferrostatin-1 (6mg.k-1) 4–6 hours before intranasal infections with sub-lethal doses (2.105 CFUs) of exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa. 6 hours later, lung tissues were fixed for 48 h in 10% buffered formalin, washed 3 times in ethanol 70% and embedded in paraffin. 5 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Histopathological scoring from 0 to 3 were attributed based on the severity of peribronchial, perivascular, and interstitial cell infiltration, resulting in a maximum score of 9.

Bacterial cultures

P. aeruginosa (PP34, PA103, CHA, PAO1, PA14) bacteria and their isogenic mutants were grown overnight in Luria Broth (LB) medium at 37°C with aeration and constant agitation in the presence or absence of EGTA (10mM) to ensure T3SS expression. Bacteria were sub-cultured the next day by dilution overnight culture 1/50 and grew until reaching an optical density (OD) O.D600 of 0.6–1. Bacterial strains and their mutants are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Resource of reagents used in this study.

Information and reagents are available upon request to Etienne.meunier@ipbs.fr.

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
GPX4, 1/1000 abcam ab125066
ExoU, 1/1000 Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
CYPOR 1/1000 abcam ab180597
Gapdh 1/10000 Gentex GTX100118
Goat anti-Rabbit HRP (1/10000) Advansta R-05072-500
Bacterial and Virus Strains
PAO1 J. Buyck/Univ of Poitiers/France N.A.
PP34 Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
PP34exoU- Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
PP34exoUS142A Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
CHA Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
CHAdST Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
CHAdSTexoU+ Ina Attree/CNRS, France. [37]
PA103 J. Buyck/Univ of Poitiers/France N.A.
PA103exoU- J. Buyck/Univ of Poitiers/France N.A.
PA14 J. Buyck/Univ of Poitiers/France N.A.
PA14 exoU- J. Buyck/Univ of Poitiers/France N.A.
Biological Samples
Human lung biopsy Hospital of Toulouse CHU 19 244 C CNRS 205782
Human blood EFS 21PLER2017-0035AV02
Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins
Recombinant ExoU This study [31]
Recombinant ExoUS142A This study [31]
FCS Fisher Scientific 16010–159
mMCSF L929 cell supernatant NA
HEPES Fisher Scientific SH30237.01
Non-essential amino acids Invitrogen
ECL Clarity Max Substrate BioRad 1705060
ECL Clarity Max Substrate BioRad 1705062
Western Blot Strip Buffer Diagomics R-03722-D50
Tris base euromedex 200923-A
SDS ultra-pure (4x) Euromedex 1012
Acrylamide / Bisacrylamide 37.5/1 30% Euromedex EU0088-B
Temed Sigma T9281-25ML
Ammonium persulfate Sigma 248614-100g
Page Ruler 10–180 kDa Fisher Scientific 15744052
Triton X-100 Euromedex 2000
DMEM Fisher Scientific 41965–039
LB Fisher Scientific BP1426-2
LB Agar INVITROGEN 22700025
Roche protease inhibitor cocktail Sigma 000000011697498001
BSA SIGMA A9647-100G
Propidium iodide Invitrogen P3566
Beads Neutrophils human Miltenyi biotec 130-104-434
Beads Neutrophils murine Miltenyi biotec 130-120-337
Kit de coloration bleue et fixable des cellules mortes LIVE/DEAD pour excitation UV ThermoFisher Scientifique L34961
APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD45 Antibody BioLegend 103116
PE/Dazzle 594 anti-human CD64 Antibody BioLegend 305032
FITC anti-mouse MERTK (Mer) Antibody BioLegend 151504
CD170 (Siglec F) Monoclonal Antibody (1RNM44N), Super Bright 780, eBioscience 78-1702-82
Ly-6G Monoclonal Antibody (1A8-Ly6g), APC eBioscience 17-9668-82
Brilliant Violet 650 anti-mouse/human CD11b Antibody BioLegend 101259
Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse Ly-6C Antibody BioLegend 128032
PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD11c Antibody BioLegend 117318
Eosinophil differentiation cocktail (IL-5) R&D Systems 405-ML-005
Eosinophil differentiation cocktail (SCF) Biolegend 579706
Eosinophil differentiation cocktail (Flt-3) Biolegend 550706
Puromycin ThermoFisher Scientifique A1113803
G418 (Geneticin) invivoGen ant-gn-1
Blasticidin nvivoGen ant-bl-1
Cumene hydroperoxide Sigma-Aldrich 247502-5G
RSL3 Sigma-Aldrich SML2234
Ferrostatin-1 Sigma-Aldrich SML0583
Liproxstatin-1 Sigma-Aldrich SML1414
DFO Sigma-Aldrich D9533
a-tocopherol Sigma-Aldrich 258024
MAFP Sigma-Aldrich M2689
PPOH CaymanChem 75770
Cox1 inhibitor Ab142904 (Abcam) Ab142904
Cox2 inhibitor NS 398 (Abcam) Ab120295
cPLA2 assay kit Cayman Chemical 765021
CD14+ beads Miltenyi biotec 130-050-201
RPMI Fisher Scientific 72400–021
OPTIMEM Fisher Scientific 31985–04
Z-VAD Invivogen tlrl-vad
TPCA-1 Tocris 2559
mTNFa abcam ab259411
Olaparib CaymanChem 10621
Necrostatin-1s Sigma-Aldrich N9037 10MG
hMCSF Miltenyi biotec 170-076-171
Fisher BioReagents Lymphocyte Separation Medium-LSM Fisher Scientific BP2663500
ExoU This study N.A.
ExoUS142A This study N.A.
Human bronchial organoid culture reagents
Advanced DMEM/F12 Invitrogen 12634028
Gibco L-Glutamine (200 mM) Fisher 11500626
Hepes 1 M Fisher 11560496
Penicillin/Streptomycin Fisher 11548876
Primocin Invivogen ant-pm-1
Basic Media In house NA
RspoI In house NA
Noggin In house NA
B27 Gibco/Invitrogen 17504044
N-Acetylcysteine Sigma A9165-5g
Nicotinamide Sigma N0636
Y-27632 Cayman 10005583
A83-01 Tocris 2939
SB 202190 Sigma S7067
FGF-7 Peprotech 100–19
FGF-10 Peprotech 100–26
Critical Commercial Assays
mIL-1alpha ELISA kit Fisher Scientific 88-5019-88
mIL-36g ELISA kit Ray Biotech ELM-IL36G
LDH Cytotoxicity Detection Kit Takara MK401
mTNFalpha ELISA kit Fisher Scientific 88-7324-22
mIL-33 ELISA kit Fisher Scientific 88-7333-88
mHMGB1 ELISA kit Clinisciences LS-F4040-1
TBAR MDA colorimetric kit Cayman 10009055
PGE2 EIA Kit Cayman 514010
LTB4 EIA kit Cayman 520111
8-PGF2 EIA kit Cayman 516351
H2DCFDA ROS detecting probe Invitrogen D399
C11 bodipy phospholipid peroxide detection probe Invitrogen D3861
ER-Tracker Blue-White DPX, for live-cell imaging Invitrogen E12353
Experimental Models: Cell Lines
WT Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Alox5-/- Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Alox12/15-/- Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Nlrc4-/- Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Casp1-/-/Casp11-/- Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
GsdmD-/- Mouse Bone marrow derived macrophages This study
WT Mouse bone marrow derived eosinophils This study
WT Mouse bone marrow derived neutrophils This study
Human blood monocyte derived macrophages This study
Human blood neutrophils This study
Immortalized WT murine bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Immortalized Gpx4-/- murine bone marrow derived macrophages This study
Human Bronchial epithelial cells This study
Human Alveolar epithelial A549 cell line This study
Human intestinal epithelial HELA cell line This study
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
WT C57Bl6J mice C. Rivers
WT C57Bl6N mice C. Rivers
Alox5-/- C57Bl6 mice A.Coste [79]
Alox12/15-/- C57Bl6 mice A.Coste [79]
Nlrc4-/- C57Bl6 mice C.Bryant [80]
Casp1-/-/Casp11-/- C57Bl6 mice B.Py/ Junying Yuan [81]
GsdmD-/- C57Bl6 mice P.Broz [82]
Human Bronchial organoids This sudy [83,84]
Oligonucleotides
Guide Crispr mGpx4- Exon1 Forward Sigma-Aldrich GGACGCTGCAGACAGCGCGG
Guide Crispr mCypor- Exon1 Forward Sigma-Aldrich
Recombinant DNA
Plasmid: ExoU [31] [31]
Plasmid: ExoUS142A [31] [31]
Plasmid: ExoUBtU [31] [31]
LentiGuide-Puro Feng Zhang lab Addgene #52963
Lenti-multi-Guide From Qin Yan Addgene #85401
pMD.2G Didier Trono lab Addgene #12259
p8.91 Didier Trono lab N.A.
LentiCas9-Blast Feng Zhang lab Addgene #52962
Software and Algorithms
Graph Pad Prism 8.0
Image J
Snapgene GSL Biotech LLC,
Chicago, U.S.A
FlowJO FlowJo LLC
Benchling Software
Other

Bone Marrow-derived Macrophage (BMDMs), Eosinophil (BMDEs) or Neutrophil (BMDNs) isolation and culture

Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMDMs) from bone marrow progenitors were differentiated in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% v/v FCS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% v/v MCSF (L929 cell supernatant), 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen), and nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen) for 7 days as previously described [85].

Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Eosinophils were differentiated in-vitro from bone marrow as previously described [86]. cells were resuspendent and cultured at 106/mL in RPMI glutamax medium with HEPES containing 20% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), and 50 μM 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 100 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF; PeproTech) and 100 ng/ml FLT3 ligand (FLT3-L; PeproTech) from days 0 to 4. On day 4, the medium containing SCF and FLT3-L was replaced with medium containing 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse (rm) IL-5 (R&D Systems) only. Medium was replaced every 4 days and the concentration of the cells was adjusted each time to106/ml. After 10 to 14 days of culture, cells were recovered by gentle pipetting and used as Eosinophils in our experiments. Over 95% of cells had the standard phenotype of Eosinophils: CD11b+ Siglec F + after FACS analysis.

Murine Bone Marrow-derived Neutrophils were isolated and purified from fresh bone marrows using Anti-Ly-6G micro bead kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Analysis of cell purity by FACS show that over 95% of cells had the standard phenotype of Neutrophils Ly6G+/Ly6C+.

2.5x105 BMDMs or 1.106 BMDEs/BMDNs were seeded in 24 well-plates and infected or exposed to various treatments. Regarding ferroptosis experiments, BMDMs were infected with various bacterial strains of P. aeruginosa expressing or not exoU at an MOI 0.1–1 for various times. When specified, recombinant microbial phospholipases (10ng-1μg) were transfected in BMDMs using Fugene (3μl per 1μg of transfected protein) for 2–4 hours. Compound-induced ferroptosis was achieved using RSL-3 (10μM, 8H) or Cumene hydroperoxide (CuOOH, 500μM, 3H).

When required, BMDMs were pretreated for 2 hours with pharmacological inhibitors necrostatin-1s (40μM), Z-VAD (40μM), olaparib (10μM), ferrostatin-1 (1–40μM), MAFP (50μM), liproxstatin (30μM), a-tocopherol (20μM).

For all stimulations, cell culture medium was replaced by serum-free and antibiotic-free Opti-MEM medium and triggers were added to the cells for various times.

Cell line culture

Immortalized murine bone-marrow derived macrophages have been described previously [85]. U937 cells were cultured in RPMI glutamax medium containing 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), and 50 μM 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich). Medium was renewed every 3 days and the concentration of the cells was adjusted each time to 5x105/ml. A549, HeLa and HBE cells were cultured in DMEM glutamax medium with HEPES containing 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies). When the cells reach approximately 90% confluency, cells are detached with Trypsin 0.05% (Gibco), cell suspension is diluted 1/10 in fresh medium, and placed back in the incubator for culture.

Purification and generation of human blood neutrophils and monocyte-derived Macrophages

Monocytes were isolated from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) from the buffy coat of healthy donors obtained from the EFS Toulouse Purpan (France) as described previously [87]. Briefly, PBMCs were isolated by centrifugation using standard Ficoll-Paque density (GE Healthcare) [85]. The blood was diluted 1:1 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pre-warmed to 37°C and carefully layered over the Ficoll-Paque gradient. The tubes were centrifuged for 25 min at 2000 rpm, at 20°C. The cell interface layer was harvested carefully, and the cells were washed twice in PBS (for 10 min at 1200 rpm followed by 10 min at 800 rpm) and re-suspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% of foetal calf serum (FCS), 1% penicillin (100 IU/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). Monocytes were separated from lymphocytes by positive selection using CD14+ isolation kit (Myltenyi biotec). To allow differentiation into monocyte-derived macrophages, cells were cultured in RPMI medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen), 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100μg/ml streptomycin, 10 ng/ml M-CSF for 7 days.

Human blood neutrophils were isolated from whole blood of healthy donors obtained from the EFS Toulouse Purpan (France). Neutrophils were enriched using MACSxpress Whole Blood Neutrophil Isolation Kit whole blood neutrophil isolation kit (Myltenyi biotec) according to manufacturer instructions. Red blood cells (RBC) were removed by 10 min incubation in RBC Lysis Buffer (BioLegend).

Genetic invalidation of Gpx4 and Cypor genes in immortalized BMDMs

Targeted genes were knocked-out using the crispr/cas9 system in immortalized BMDMs. Single guide RNAs (sgRNA) specifically targeting Gpx4 exon1 (for 5’ GGACGCTGCAGACAGCGCGG 3’ Cypor exon2 (for 5’ AGTGTCTCTATTCAGCACAA 3’ were designed using Benchling tool (Benchling.com), and oligonucleotides were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich. Crispr guide RNA oligonucleotides were hybridized and subsequently cloned into the vector Lenti-gRNA-Puromycin using BsmBI restriction enzyme (Addgene 52963, Feng Zhang lab). Generated constructs were then transfected in lipofectamine 2000 into HEK293T for 48 hours together with the lentiviral packaging vector p8.91 (Didier Trono lab, EPFL, Switzerland) and the envelop coding VSVg plasmid (pMD.2G, Addgene 12259, Didier Trono lab). Viral supernatants were harvested, filtered on 0.45 μm filter and used to infect cells expressing Cas9 (1,000,000 cells/well in 6-well plates. Efficient infection viral particles was ensured by centrifugating cells for 2 h at 2900 rpm at 32°C in presence of 8μg/ml polybrene. 48 h later, medium was replaced and Puromycin selection (10μg/mL) was applied to select positive clones for two weeks. Puromycin-resistant cells were sorted at the single cell level by FACS (Aria cell sorter). Individual clones were subjected to western blotting to confirm the absence of targeted proteins.

Human bronchial organoid production and maintenance

Airway organoids were derived from lung biopsies as described [83,84]. Briefly, Human lung tissue was provided by the CHU of Toulouse under the CNRS approved protocols CHU 19 244 C and CNRS 205782. All patients participating in this study consented to scientific use of their material. Biopsies (1 mm3) of normal lung tissue adjacent to the tumor obtained from patients who underwent lung resection due to Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were minced and digested with 2 mg ml−1 collagenase (Sigma) on an orbital shaker at 37°C for 1h. The digested tissue suspension was sheared using flamed glass Pasteur pipettes and strained over a 100-μm cell strainer (Falcon). The resultant single cell suspensions were embedded in 10 mg ml−1 of Cultrex growth factor reduced BME type 2 (R & D Systems) and 40μl drops were seeded on Nunclon Delta surface 24-well plates (Thermo Scientific). Following polymerization, 500 μl of Advanced DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1x L-Glutamine (Fisher Scientific), 10mM Hepes (Fisher Scientific), 100 U ml-1 / 100 μg ml-1 Penicillin / Streptomycin (Fisher Scientific), 50 μg ml-1 Primocin (InvivoGen), 10% Noggin (homemade), 10% RspoI (homemade), 1x B27 (Gibco), 1.25mM N-Acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich), 10mM Nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich), 5μM Y-27632 (Cayman Chemical), 500nM A83-01 (Tocris Bioscience), 1μM SB 202190 (Sigma-Aldrich), 25 ng ml−1 FGF-7 (PeproTech), 100 ng ml−1 FGF-10 (PeproTech) was added to each well and plates transferred to humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. The organoids were passaged every 4 weeks.

Organoid infections

Before infection, 35μl drops of Matrigel (Fisher Scientific) containing organoids were seeded on Nunclon Delta surface 35x10mm Dish (Thermo Scientific) and 2ml of Advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1x L-Glutamine and 10mM Hepes was added to each plate. Depending on the indicated conditions, organoids were pretreated or no with 40μM Ferrostatin-1 for 1hr before infection. Ferrostatin-1 was maintained throughout the experiment. PP34 exoU or exoUS142A were grown as previously described until reach OD600 = 1. Bacterial density was adjusted to OD600 = 0.0005, and phenol red added at 0.005% to visualize successful microinjection (2). Injected organoids were individually collected and re-seeded into fresh matrix for subsequent analysis. For time-lapse imaging, injected and stimulated organoids were stained with 50 μg ml-1 Propidium Iodide (Thermo Scientific). Images were acquired every 15 minutes for the duration of experiments under an EVOS M7000 (Thermo Scientific) Imaging System (10x, at 37°C with 5% CO2). Data was analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ.

Cell necrosis, alarmin/cytokine and lipid release assays

LDH Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Takara) was used to determine the percentage of cell lysis. Normalization of spontaneous lysis was calculated as follows: (LDH infected–LDH uninfected)/(LDH total lysis–LDH uninfected)*100.

Murine Il-1α, IL-33, IL-36α, IL-36γ, HMGB1, TNFα, cytokine levels in cell supernatants or in BALFs were measured by ELISA listed in resource Table 1.

Oxidized lipids isoprostanes, eicosanoids PGE2 and LTB4 were detected in cellular supernatants or BALFs using EIA kits listed in resource Table 1.

Plasma membrane permeabilization assays

Cells are plated at density of 1 x 105 per well in 96-well Plates or at 2x105/well in 24-well plates (Corning 356640) in complete culture medium. The following day, medium is replaced by Opti-MEM supplemented with Propidium iodide (100 ng/ml) or SYTOX green (100ng/mL). Pharmacological inhibitors are added 1h before infection. Red (Propidium Iodide) or green (SYTOX) fluorescence are measured in real-time using Clariostar plate reader or an EVOS7000 microscope, both equipped with a 37°C cell incubator.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) assays

Malondialdehyde production was addressed using the MDA lipid peroxidation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam, ab118970). Cells were lysed using 500 μl of lysis buffer supplemented with butylated hydroxytoulene. Cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 g (RCF) and the supernatants were used for MDA assay. TBA solution was added to each replicate, and samples were then incubated at 95°C for 1 hour. 100μL of each sample was then processed for fluorometric assay at Ex/Em = 532/553 nm. BAL levels of MDA were normalized to the total protein concentration.

Recombinant protein production

Plasmids coding for exoUBtU, exoU or exoUS142A were a kind gift from Dara W. Frank’s lab. All recombinant proteins were expressed in BL21(DE3) pLysS strain in LB medium, according to Anderson DM et al. [31]. Proteins fused with an N-terminus hexahistidine-tag were purified as previously described with slight modifications. Briefly, after cell harvest, bacteria were lysed by sonication under ice and recombinant proteins were purified by nickel metal affinity chromatography (Takara). After sample concentration, Superose 6 was exchanged for a Superdex 200 size exclusion column (GE Healthcare) as a final purification step. Samples were either used fresh or keep at -80°C for long-term storage. ExoU and ExoUS142A activities were validated on cellular lysates (Fig 3I) based on the advices and experience of our collaborator [37].

Cytometry quantification of immune cells in mice BAL fluids (BALFs)

C57BL/6 mice received an injection of Ferrostatine (6mg/kg) or PBS as control intraperitoneally. 4-6h after, mice were infected by intranasal instillation of 50 μL of PBS containing or not 5x106 bacteria (PP34) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (6mg /kg). 18h after infection, BALFs were collected and quality/quantity of immune cells content was assayed by flow cytometry. Briefly, cells were pelleted (1000 rpm, 5 minutes), Red blood cells (RBC) were removed by 10 min incubation in RBC Lysis Buffer (BioLegend), monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils were subsequently stained with a cocktail of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies detailed in the “Material and Method” section. Cells were then fixed in 4% PFA before fluorescence associated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using a LSRII instrument. AccuCheck Counting Beads (ThermoFisher) were used to determine absolute cell number. Data analysis and processing were performed using FlowJO software.

Lipid peroxidation or ROS production

To measure lipid peroxidation or ROS production, cells were first washed with PBS 1X, and then incubated with either C11-BODIPY(581/591) (ThermoFisher) at 2 μM, or H2DCFDA (ThermoFisher) at 10 μM in Opti-MEM medium for 30 min at 37°C. After three washes with PBS 1X cells are resuspended in Opti-MEM medium and infected/treated in presence or absence of pharmacological inhibitors. After 1-3h of infection, cells are washed with PBS, detached in MACS buffer (PBS-BSA 0,5%-EDTA 2mM) and samples were acquired within one hour using a flow cytometer (BD FORTESSA LSR II or a FACS Calibur). Data were analysed with FlowJO software (version 10). When specified, adherent cells loaded with Bodipy probes where infected at indicated MOIs of P. aeruginosa and lipid peroxidation is observed using an EVOS7000 microscope. For live imaging, the GFP brightness threshold was kept equal for all the independent experiments. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ.

Immunoblotting

Cell lysate generation has been described previously [85]. Briefly, proteins were loaded in 12% SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred on PVDF membranes. After saturation for 1 hour in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20 containing 5% non-fat milk (pH8), membranes were exposed with antibodies at 4°C overnight (Table 1). Next day, membranes were washed 3 times in TBS 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Table 1) for 1h at room temperature. Immunoblottings were revealed using a chemiluminescent substrate ECL substrate (Biorad) and images were acquired on a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad). All antibodies and their working concentrations are listed in Table 1.

(Redox) lipidomic

1 million bone-marrow-derived macrophages were seeded into 6-well plates. Next day, BMDMs were transfected with recombinant ExoU or ExoUS142A proteins (500ng/well) for one hour. Then, supernatant was removed, cells were washed two times in PBS. Finally, 500μL of a cold solution of 50% PBS/50% Methanol was added to cells and samples were transferred to -80°C for storage and subsequent analyses.

After thawing, lipids were extracted using a methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)-based liquid-liquid extraction method. Cell suspensions (500 μL in PBS/methanol 1:1, v/v) were thawed on ice before adding 100 μL methanol MeOH containing 50 ng each of the internal standards PC(15:0/18:1-d7), PE(15:0/18:1- d7), PG(15:0/18:1-d7), PI(15:0/18:1-d7) and PS(15:0/18:1-d7) (EquiSPLASH, Avanti Polar Lipids). Samples were then transferred into 8-mL screw-cap tubes, and then 1.125 methanol and 5 mL MTBE were added. After vigorous mixing, samples were incubated at room temperature on a tabletop shaker for 45 min. For phase separation, 1.25 mL water was added, and samples were vortexed and centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 x g. The upper organic phase of each sample was carefully removed using a Pasteur pipette, transferred into an empty glass round-bottom tube, and dried under vacuum in a SpeedVac concentrator. The dried lipid extracts were resuspended in 200 μL HPLC mobile phase A/mobile phase B 3:1 (v/v) for targeted lipidomic analysis of oxidized phospholipids. For LC-MS/MS, using a Sciex ExionLC Integrated System, 20 μL of each lipid extract was injected using Column Kinetex 2.6 μm HILIC 100 Å 100x2.1 mm, Phenomenex and a Flow Rate of 200 μL/min. Then, the analyte-specific m/z transition profile was determined and the area under the peak (ion intensity vs. elution time) was calculated using MultiQuant, Sciex software.

Data calculation was performed by doing ratio between the values of “area ratio analyte/internal standard” of each oxidized phospholipid and its non-oxidized phospholipid. The fold induction in oxidized phospholipid was then calculated by doing a ratio between each oxidized ratio and the non-stimulated condition. Accordingly, the unstimulated condition oxidized ratios were 1 or 0 when no peroxidation was detected in any condition.

Phospholipase activity measurement

Evaluation of ExoU phospholipase activity was performed using the Cayman Chemical cPLA2 kit and performed as previously described with minor modifications [37]. Briefly, 10 μL of a 1mg/mL (160pmols) solution of recombinant ExoU or ExoUS142 proteins were mixed in 96-well plates with 10μL of lysed cell samples and 10μL of Assay Buffer. Then, samples were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with 250μL of substrate solution (1.5 mM arachidonyl thiophosphatidylcholonie) and then for additional 4 or 16 hours in dark. Reaction was stopped using 25mM solution of DTNB according to manufacturer instructions and absorbance was detected at 405nm using a Clariostar plate reader. Phospholipase activity of ExoU or ExoUS142 was calculated as the hydrolysis rate accordingly to the manufacturer instructions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical data analysis was performed using Prism 8.0a (GraphPad Software, Inc.). We used t-test with Bonferroni correction for comparison of two groups. Data are reported as mean with SEM. Regarding animal experiments, we used Mann-Whitney tests and mouse survival analysis were done using log-rank Cox-Mantel test. P values in figures have the following meaning; NS non-significant and Significance is specified as *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Original immunoblotting membranes.

(TIF)

S2 Data. Numerical values obtained in the current study.

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. ExoU-dependent lung pathology in mice occurs in an inflammasome-independent manner.

(A) Survival of WT, Casp1-/-/Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- mice intranasally infected (n = 6 animals per condition) with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34. Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. NS: Not significant using Log-rank Cox-Mantel test for survival comparisons. (B) Bronchoalveolar (BAL) and lung bacterial loads from WT, Casp1-/-/Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- mice (n = 6) 18 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34. Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. NS: Not significant using Mann-Whitney analysis test.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Lipid peroxidation contributes to ExoU-induced necrosis in various cell types.

(A, B) Measure of LDH release in various human and murine cell types infected with various P. aeruginosa strains expressing or not exoU in presence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 2 hours. (C) LDH release in BMDMs transfected with recombinant ExoU (100ng) or its catalytically inactive mutant ExoUS142A, in presence of MAFP (50μM) or Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 3 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (D) Immunoblotting of ExoU secretion by P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM). Star (*) show non-specific bands. (E) Measure of bacterial growth (O.D 600) in presence or absence of ferrostatin-1 (10, 20μM) for 14 hours). (F) Measure of LDH release in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34 (MOI5) in presence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 3 hours. Each hour, fresh Ferrostatin-1 (10μM) was added to cells (+) or not (φ). “pi” refers to post-infection.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Lipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent necrosis.

(A) ROS production in WT BMDMs transfected with ExoU or its catalytically dead mutant ExoUS142A for 45 minutes using H2DCFDA (1μM) probe. (B) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phospho)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT BMDMs infected with PP34ExoU+ or PP34ExoU- (MOI 5) for 1 hour. Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graph shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. *P≤0.05, for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (C) Lipidomic analysis of the relative amount of each phospholipid upon rExoU transfection analysed in Fig 3B. (D) Representative microscopy images and time course experiment of propidium iodide uptake in WT BMDMs transfected with rExoU or its catalytically inactive mutant ExoUS142A (500ng) in presence or not of ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM). Images show two independent experiments, each performed three times at 45 minutes or 3 hours post transfection. (E) Immunoblotting of Crispr Cas9-mediated Cypor gene deletion in immortalized (i)BMDMs or of Cypor-deficient HELA cells. The Cypor#2 (red) was selected for further analysis. GFP means that cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting Gfp and used as control. (F) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phospho)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT or Cypor-/- immortalized (i)BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then infected with PP34ExoU+ or PP34ExoU- (MOI 5) for 1 hour. Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graphs shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. *P ≤ 0.05, **P≤0.001, for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (G) Immunoblotting of Crispr Cas9-mediated Gpx4 gene deletion in immortalized BMDMs. The Gpx4#1 (red) was selected for further analysis. CD8 and GFP means that cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting Gfp or Cd8 genes and used as controls. (H) Cytometry detection and quantification of phospholipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in immortalized WT or Gpx4-/- BMDMs using a fortessa cytometer. (I) Measure of 8-iso PGF2α isprostane in cell supernatant in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then transfected with rExoU (500ng) for 3 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (J) PGE2 and LTB4 eicosanoid release in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) and then transfected with 100ng of ExoU or its catalytically dead mutant ExoUS142A for 3 hours.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Ferrostatin-1 protects mice against ExoU-induced lung pathology.

(A) Gating strategy to analyse Immune cell populations in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs). Immune cells were identified as CD45+ cells. Among CD45+ cells, different subset of immune cells including Interstitial/Alveolar Macrophages, Eosinophils and Neutrophils are identified based on specific cell surface marker expression.

(TIF)

S1 Graphical Abstract. Host lipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-induced cell necrosis-dependent pathology.

In resting cells or in cells with induced lipid peroxidation (e.g. ferroptosis pathway), ExoU (purple) becomes hyper-activated by host cell peroxidised phospholipids, which drives an exacerbated cell necrosis, alarmin and lipid release and contributes to the subsequent pathology. Consequently, targeting lipid peroxidation (ferrostatin-1) inhibits ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and attenuates the host deleterious consequences. EM and SB used Biorender.com to create this figure.

(TIF)

S1 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S2 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death in presence of 20μM of ferrostatin-1 using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S3 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (MOI1) using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S4 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (MOI1) in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S5 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (MOI1) using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S6 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (MOI1) in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) using SYTOX green.

1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

(AVI)

S7 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected human bronchial organoids using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

S8 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected human bronchial organoids in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

S9 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

S10 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

S11 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

S12 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

(AVI)

Acknowledgments

Alox5–/–and Alox12/15–/–mice came from Jaxson Laboratory. Nlrc4–/–mice were provided by Clare E. Bryant and generated by Millenium, GsdmD–/–mice came from P. Broz (Univ of Lausanne), and Casp1–/–/ Casp11–/–came from B. Py (ENS Lyon, France) and were generated by Junying Yuan (Harvard Med School, Boston, USA). Phospholipid redox lipidomic experiments were performed by Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, USA). Authors also acknowledge the animal facility and Cytometry/microscopy platforms of the IPBS institute. The graphical abstract was generated using Biorender.com.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files S1 and S2 Datas.

Funding Statement

This project was funded by grants from the National Research Agency (ANR, Endiabac), FRM “Amorçage Jeunes Equipes” (AJE20151034460), ERC StG (INFLAME 804249) and ATIP-Avenir program to EM, from National Research Agency (ANR, MacGlycoTB) to YR, from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID, 2020) to RP, from the Van Gogh Programme to IPBS-M4i institutes, from Invivogen-CIFRE collaborative PhD fellowship to MP and from the FRM (FDT202106012794), Mali and Campus France cooperative agencies to SB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death and Differentiation. Nature Publishing Group; 2018. pp. 486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang L, Lu C, Zheng G, Burgering BMT. Emerging insights on the role of gasdermins in infection and inflammatory diseases. Clinical and Translational Immunology. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2020. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bedoui S, Herold MJ, Strasser A. Emerging connectivity of programmed cell death pathways and its physiological implications. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Research; 2020. pp. 678–695. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0270-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Place DE, Lee SJ, Kanneganti TD. PANoptosis in microbial infection. Current Opinion in Microbiology. Elsevier Ltd; 2021. pp. 42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149: 1060–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Conrad M, Kagan VE, Bayir H, Pagnussat GC, Head B, Traber MG, et al. Regulation of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in diverse species. Genes and Development. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2018. pp. 602–619. doi: 10.1101/gad.314674.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jenkins NL, James SA, Salim A, Sumardy F, Speed TP, Conrad M, et al. Changes in ferrous iron and glutathione promote ferroptosis and frailty in aging caenorhabditis elegans. Elife. 2020;9: 1–28. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bogacz M, Krauth-Siegel RL. Tryparedoxin peroxidase-deficiency commits trypanosomes to ferroptosis-type cell death. Elife. 2018;7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bochkov VN, Oskolkova O V., Birukov KG, Levonen AL, Binder CJ, Stöckl J. Generation and biological activities of oxidized phospholipids. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 2010. pp. 1009–1059. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Anthonymuthu T, Amoscato AA, Sparvero LJ, Nesterova AM, et al. “Redox lipidomics technology: Looking for a needle in a haystack.”Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2019. pp. 93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 2019;575: 688–692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doll S, Freitas FP, Shah R, Aldrovandi M, da Silva MC, Ingold I, et al. FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature. 2019;575: 693–698. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1707-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conrad M, Pratt DA. The chemical basis of ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15: 1137–1147. doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0408-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang WS, Kim KJ, Gaschler MM, Patel M, Shchepinov MS, Stockwell BR. Peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by lipoxygenases drives ferroptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113: E4966–E4975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603244113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13: 91–98. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kagan VE, Mao G, Qu F, Angeli JPF, Doll S, Croix CS, et al. Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PEs navigate cells to ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13: 81–90. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wiernicki B, Dubois H, Tyurina YY, Hassannia B, Bayir H, Kagan VE, et al. Excessive phospholipid peroxidation distinguishes ferroptosis from other cell death modes including pyroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11: 922. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03118-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stockwell BR, Jiang X, Gu W. Emerging Mechanisms and Disease Relevance of Ferroptosis. 2020. [cited 13 Nov 2020]. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amaral EP, Costa DL, Namasivayam S, Riteau N, Kamenyeva O, Mittereder L, et al. A major role for ferroptosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis–induced cell death and tissue necrosis. J Exp Med. 2019;216: 556–570. doi: 10.1084/jem.20181776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li N, Wang W, Zhou H, Wu Q, Duan M, Liu C, et al. Ferritinophagy-mediated ferroptosis is involved in sepsis-induced cardiac injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;160: 303–318. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu H, Santo A, Jia Z, Li Y. GPx4 in Bacterial Infection and Polymicrobial Sepsis: Involvement of Ferroptosis and Pyroptosis. React Oxyg Species. 2019;7: 154. doi: 10.20455/ros.2019.835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dar HH, Tyurina YY, Mikulska-Ruminska K, Shrivastava I, Ting HC, Tyurin VA, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilizes host polyunsaturated phosphatidylethanolamines to trigger theft-ferroptosis in bronchial epithelium. J Clin Invest. 2018;128: 4639–4653. doi: 10.1172/JCI99490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meunier E, Neyrolles O. Die another way: Ferroptosis drives tuberculosis pathology. J Exp Med. 2019;216: 471–473. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Friedmann Angeli JP, Schneider M, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Hammond VJ, et al. Inactivation of the ferroptosis regulator Gpx4 triggers acute renal failure in mice. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16: 1180–1191. doi: 10.1038/ncb3064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yan1 B, Ai1 Y, Zhang1 Z, Sun1 Q, Ma1 Y, Zhang1 Z, et al. Oxidoreductases generate hydrogen peroxide that drives iron-dependent lipid peroxidation during ferroptosis 2 The inhibition of antioxidant systems of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) or ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) causes iron-dependent peroxid. bioRxiv. 2020; 2020.08.01.231993. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.01.231993 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zou Y, Li H, Graham ET, Deik AA, Eaton JK, Wang W, et al. Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase contributes to phospholipid peroxidation in ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16: 302–309. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0472-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Howell HA, Logan LK, Hauser AR. Type III secretion of ExoU is critical during early Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia. MBio. 2013;4. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00032-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gendrin C, Contreras-Martel C, Bouillot S, Elsen S, Lemaire D, Skoufias DA, et al. Structural Basis of Cytotoxicity Mediated by the Type III Secretion Toxin ExoU from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Saper MA, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002637. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Phillips RM, Six DA, Dennis EA, Ghosh P. In Vivo Phospholipase Activity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cytotoxin ExoU and Protection of Mammalian Cells with Phospholipase A2 Inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 41326–41332. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302472200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sato H, Frank DW. ExoU is a potent intracellular phospholipase. Molecular Microbiology. Mol Microbiol; 2004. pp. 1279–1290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04194.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anderson DM, Sato H, Dirck AT, Feix JB, Frank DW. Ubiquitin activates patatin-like phospholipases from multiple bacterial species. J Bacteriol. 2015;197: 529–541. doi: 10.1128/JB.02402-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wilson SK, Knoll LJ. Patatin-like phospholipases in microbial infections with emerging roles in fatty acid metabolism and immune regulation by Apicomplexa. Molecular Microbiology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2018. pp. 34–46. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dessen A. Phospholipase A2 enzymes: Structural diversity in lipid messenger metabolism. Structure. Current Biology Ltd; 2000. pp. R15–R22. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00097-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sitkiewicz I, Nagiec MJ, Sumby P, Butler SD, Cywes-Bentley C, Musser JM. Emergence of a bacterial clone with enhanced virulence by acquisition of a phage encoding a secreted phospholipase A2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 16009–16014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607669103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Diaz MH, Hauser AR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxin ExoU is injected into phagocytic cells during acute pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 1447–1456. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01134-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rabin SDP, Hauser AR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU, a toxin transported by the type III secretion system, kills Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Infect Immun. 2003;71: 4144–4150. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.7.4144-4150.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Deruelle V, Bouillot S, Job V, Taillebourg E, Fauvarque M-O, Attrée I, et al. The bacterial toxin ExoU requires a host trafficking chaperone for transportation and to induce necrosis. bioRxiv. 2020; 2020.11.04.367706. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.04.367706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Machado GB, de Oliveira A V., Saliba AM, de Lima CDM, Suassuna JHR, Plotkowski MC. Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin ExoU induces a PAF-dependent impairment of alveolar fibrin turnover secondary to enhanced activation of coagulation and increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in the course of mice pneumosepsis. Respir Res. 2011;12: 104. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pazos MA, Lanter BB, Yonker LM, Eaton AD, Pirzai W, Gronert K, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU augments neutrophil transepithelial migration. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saliba AM, Nascimento DO, Silva MCA, Assis MC, Gayer CRM, Raymond B, et al. Eicosanoid-mediated proinflammatory activity of pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7: 1811–1822. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00635.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.da Cunha LG, Ferreira MF, de Moraes JA, Reis PA, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, Barja-Fidalgo C, et al. ExoU-induced redox imbalance and oxidative stress in airway epithelial cells during Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumosepsis. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015;204: 673–680. doi: 10.1007/s00430-015-0418-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Al Moussawi K, Kazmierczak BI. Distinct contributions of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and IL-1β to innate immune recognition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lung. Infect Immun. 2014;82: 4204–4211. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02218-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shaver CM, Hauser AR. Relative contributions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU, ExoS, and ExoT to virulence in the lung. Infect Immun. 2004;72: 6969–6977. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.6969-6977.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Miao EA, Ernst RK, Dors M, Mao DP, Aderem A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa activates caspase 1 through Ipaf. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 2562–2567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712183105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eren E, Planès R, Buyck J, Bordignon P-J, Colom A, Cunrath O, et al. Type-3 Secretion System–induced pyroptosis protects Pseudomonas against cell-autonomous immunity. bioRxiv. 2019; 650333. doi: 10.1101/650333 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Santos JC, Dick MS, Lagrange B, Degrandi D, Pfeffer K, Yamamoto M, et al. LPS targets host guanylate-binding proteins to the bacterial outer membrane for non-canonical inflammasome activation. EMBO J. 2018;37. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bitto NJ, Baker PJ, Dowling JK, Wray-McCann G, De Paoli A, Tran LS, et al. Membrane vesicles from Pseudomonas aeruginosa activate the noncanonical inflammasome through caspase-5 in human monocytes. Immunol Cell Biol. 2018;96: 1120–1130. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Franchi L, Stoolman J, Kanneganti TD, Verma A, Ramphal R, Núñez G. Critical role for Ipaf in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced caspase-1 activation. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37: 3030–3039. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Balakrishnan A, Karki R, Berwin B, Yamamoto M, Kanneganti T-D. Guanylate binding proteins facilitate caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis in response to type 3 secretion system-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4: 66. doi: 10.1038/s41420-018-0068-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sutterwala FS, Mijares LA, Li L, Ogura Y, Kazmierczak BI, Flavell RA. Immune recognition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated by the IPAF/NLRC4 inflammasome. J Exp Med. 2007;204: 3235–3245. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cohen TS, Prince AS. Activation of inflammasome signaling mediates pathology of acute P. aeruginosa pneumonia. J Clin Invest. 2013;123: 1630–1637. doi: 10.1172/JCI66142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Faure E, Mear JB, Faure K, Normand S, Couturier-Maillard A, Grandjean T, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa type-3 secretion system dampens host defense by exploiting the NLRC4-coupled inflammasome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189: 799–811. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1358OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Iannitti RG, Napolioni V, Oikonomou V, De Luca A, Galosi C, Pariano M, et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist ameliorates inflammasome-dependent inflammation in murine and human cystic fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 1–16. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aoyagi T, Newstead MW, Zeng X, Nanjo Y, Peters-Golden M, Kaku M, et al. Interleukin-36γ and IL-36 receptor signaling mediate impaired host immunity and lung injury in cytotoxic Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection: Role of prostaglandin E2. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yang D, Han Z, Oppenheim JJ. Alarmins and immunity. Immunological Reviews. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2017. pp. 41–56. doi: 10.1111/imr.12577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Saliba AM, De Assis MC, Nishi R, Raymond B, Marques EDA, Lopes UG, et al. Implications of oxidative stress in the cytotoxicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU. Microbes Infect. 2006;8: 450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Skouta R, Dixon SJ, Wang J, Dunn DE, Orman M, Shimada K, et al. Ferrostatins inhibit oxidative lipid damage and cell death in diverse disease models. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136: 4551–4556. doi: 10.1021/ja411006a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tamura M, Ajayi T, Allmond LR, Moriyama K, Wiener-Kronish JP, Sawa T. Lysophospholipase A activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretory toxin ExoU. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;316: 323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.02.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lovatt M, Adnan K, Kocaba V, Dirisamer M, Peh GSL, Mehta JS. Peroxiredoxin-1 regulates lipid peroxidation in corneal endothelial cells. Redox Biol. 2020;30: 101417. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Beatty A, Singh T, Tyurina YY, Nicolas E, Maslar K, Zhou Y, et al. Conjugated linolenic fatty acids trigger ferroptosis in triple-negative breast cancer. [cited 11 Jan 2021]. doi: 10.1101/556084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lu B, Chen X bing, Hong Y cai, Zhu H, He Q jun, Yang B, et al. Identification of PRDX6 as a regulator of ferroptosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2019;40: 1334–1342. doi: 10.1038/s41401-019-0233-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Beharier O, Tyurin VA, Goff JP, Guerrero-Santoro J, Kajiwara K, Chu T, et al. PLA2G6 guards placental trophoblasts against ferroptotic injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117: 27319–27328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009201117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sadikot RT, Zeng H, Azim AC, Joo M, Dey SK, Beyer RM, et al. Bacterial clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is enhanced by the inhibtion of COX-2. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37: 1001–1009. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tyurin VA, Balasubramanian K, Winnica D, Tyurina YY, Vikulina AS, He RR, et al. Oxidatively modified phosphatidylserines on the surface of apoptotic cells are essential phagocytic “eat-me” signals: Cleavage and inhibition of phagocytosis by Lp-PLA 2. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21: 825–835. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Magtanong L, Ko PJ, To M, Cao JY, Forcina GC, Tarangelo A, et al. Exogenous Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Promote a Ferroptosis-Resistant Cell State. Cell Chem Biol. 2019;26: 420–432.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zou Y, Henry WS, Ricq EL, Graham ET, Phadnis V V., Maretich P, et al. Plasticity of ether lipids promotes ferroptosis susceptibility and evasion. Nature. 2020;585: 603–608. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2732-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kinsey GR, Blum JL, Covington MD, Cummings BS, McHowat J, Schnellmann RG. Decreased iPLA2γ expression induces lipid peroxidation and cell death and sensitizes cells to oxidant-induced apoptosis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49: 1477–1487. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800030-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Miyamoto S, Dupas C, Murota K, Terao J. Phospholipid hydroperoxides are detoxified by phospholipase A2 and GSH peroxidase in rat gastric mucosa. Lipids. 2003;38: 641–649. doi: 10.1007/s11745-003-1109-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van Kuijk FJGM, Sevanian A, Handelman GJ, Dratz EA. A new role for phospholipase A2: protection of membranes from lipid peroxidation damage. Trends Biochem Sci. 1987;12: 31–34. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(87)90014-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sevanian A, Wratten M Lou, McLeod LL, Kim E. Lipid peroxidation and phospholipase A2 activity in liposomes composed of unsaturated phospholipids: a structural basis for enzyme activation. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)/Lipids Lipid Metab. 1988;961: 316–327. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(88)90079-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yedgar S, Cohen Y, Shoseyov D. Control of phospholipase A2 activities for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. Elsevier; 2006. pp. 1373–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kienesberger PC, Oberer M, Lass A, Zechner R. Mammalian patatin domain containing proteins: A family with diverse lipolytic activities involved in multiple biological functions. Journal of Lipid Research. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; 2009. p. S63. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800082-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hiu JJ, Yap MKK. Cytotoxicity of snake venom enzymatic toxins: Phospholipase A2 and L-amino acid oxidase. Biochemical Society Transactions. Portland Press Ltd; 2020. pp. 719–731. doi: 10.1042/BST20200110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Flores-Díaz M, Monturiol-Gross L, Naylor C, Alape-Girón A, Flieger A. Bacterial Sphingomyelinases and Phospholipases as Virulence Factors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80: 597–628. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00082-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sitkiewicz I, Stockbauer KE, Musser JM. Secreted bacterial phospholipase A2 enzymes: better living through phospholipolysis. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15: 63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Palm NW, Rosenstein RK, Yu S, Schenten DD, Florsheim E, Medzhitov R. Bee venom phospholipase A2 induces a primary type 2 response that is dependent on the receptor ST2 and confers protective immunity. Immunity. 2013;39: 976–985. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cayrol C, Duval A, Schmitt P, Roga S, Camus M, Stella A, et al. Environmental allergens induce allergic inflammation through proteolytic maturation of IL-33. Nat Immunol. 2018;19: 375–385. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0067-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kain HS, Glennon EKK, Vijayan K, Arang N, Douglass AN, Fortin CL, et al. Liver stage malaria infection is controlled by host regulators of lipid peroxidation. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27: 44–54. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0338-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lefèvre L, Authier H, Stein S, Majorel C, Couderc B, Dardenne C, et al. LRH-1 mediates anti-inflammatory and antifungal phenotype of IL-13-activated macrophages through the PPARγ ligand synthesis. Nat Commun. 2015;6: 1–13. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Man SM, Hopkins LJ, Nugent E, Cox S, Glück IM, Tourlomousis P, et al. Inflammasome activation causes dual recruitment of NLRC4 and NLRP3 to the same macromolecular complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: 7403–7408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402911111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li P, Allen H, Banerjee S, Franklin S, Herzog L, Johnston C, et al. Mice deficient in IL-1β-converting enzyme are defective in production of mature IL-1β and resistant to endotoxic shock. Cell. 1995;80: 401–411. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90490-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Demarco B, Grayczyk JP, Bjanes E, Roy D Le, Tonnus W, Assenmacher CA, et al. Caspase-8-dependent gasdermin D cleavage promotes antimicrobial defense but confers susceptibility to TNF-induced lethality. Sci Adv. 2020;6: 3465–3483. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc3465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bartfeld S, Clevers H. Organoids as model for infectious diseases: Culture of human and murine stomach organoids and microinjection of helicobacter pylori. J Vis Exp. 2015;2015. doi: 10.3791/53359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Böttinger L, Klay D, et al. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Eren E, Planès R, Bagayoko S, Bordignon P, Chaoui K, Hessel A, et al. Irgm2 and Gate-16 cooperatively dampen Gram-negative bacteria-induced caspase-11 response. EMBO Rep. 2020;21. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dyer KD, Moser JM, Czapiga M, Siegel SJ, Percopo CM, Rosenberg HF. Functionally Competent Eosinophils Differentiated Ex Vivo in High Purity from Normal Mouse Bone Marrow. J Immunol. 2008;181: 4004–4009. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.4004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Troegeler A, Lastrucci C, Duval C, Tanne A, Cougoule C, Maridonneau-Parini I, et al. An efficient siRNA-mediated gene silencing in primary human monocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages. Immunol Cell Biol. 2014;92: 699–708. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

David Skurnik, Gregory P Priebe

6 Apr 2021

Dear Dr. Meunier,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

Please pay particular attention to the following reviewer suggestions and give them due consideration.

  1. As requested by Reviewers 1 and 2, clarify how ExoU-mediated necrosis deviates from ferroptosis.

  2. As requested by Reviewer 3, please provide additional time course experiments to show the time of the first signs of necrosis. Please also assess the levels of oxidized lipids in cultures infected with viable bacteria (ExoU+ and ExoU-) to strengthen the results obtained with recombinant ExoU.

  3. Please revise the graphical abstract to include depictions of the time sequence and of the balanced state as well as hyper- and hypo-lipid peroxidation states.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Gregory P Priebe, M.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

David Skurnik

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The research article entitled, “Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology” is an interesting and important study that further clarifies the mechanism by which ExoU causes host cell lysis in a variety of cell types. The authors present strong evidence to support the hypothesis that ExoU injected into the cytosol of host cells by bacterial type III secretion system utilizes the natural process of membrane lipid peroxidation to enhance ExoU phospholipase A2 activity leading to rapid necrosis. Oxidized lipids serve as signals for the cellular process of ferroptosis and increasing or inhibiting ferroptosis through modulation of lipid peroxidation appears to modulate ExoU activity in parallel. Two main conclusions remain somewhat unclear from these studies;

(1) How does exoU mediated necrosis deviate from ferroptosis? If lipid peroxidation enhances both ExoU-mediated necrosis and feroptosis, is there a means to prevent ferroptosis is the context of increased lipid peroxidation that would preserve ExoU-mediated necrosis or vice versa? Are other triggers of necrosis resistant to feostatin-1 treatment when they do not depend on lipid peroxidation? In a balanced lipid peroxidative state is would seem that the presence of ExoU exploits the basal state of lipid peroxidation to cleave at the sn2 position and this heightened PLA2 activity may serve to destabilize the membrane, however, in a heightened lipid peroxidative state where the cell is destined for ferroptosis, does ExoU necrosis override this process and what are distinguishing consequences, if any, between a cell undergoing ExoU-mediated exocytosis or ferroptosis? Is alarmin release an exclusive indicator of cell necrosis or does this occur during ferroptosis? In Figure 2D, is there a reason why there is no phenotype in alox12/15-/- cells? Is 15LOX-1 in mice critical means of oxidizing membrane phospholipids?

(2) For in vivo studies, what is the relative contribution of cellular necrosis versus elaboration of eicosanoid inflammatory mediators and recruitment of immune cells (which precedes necrosis) toward the lung pathology? What cell types in vivo are the most consequential target of ExoU that result in pathology. Since ferrostatin-1 inhibits lipid peroxidation, it would be predicted by the conclusion, “ExoU-targeted peroxidised phospholipids might increase its phospholipase activity toward all phospholipids (peroxidized or not)”, that both cellular necrosis and enhanced release of inflammatory mediator would be interfered with by ferrostatin-1 treatment. The authors draw the conclusion that, “Although a pathological function of recruited immune cells such as neutrophils is probable, we hypothesize that ferrostatin-1-inhibited resident alveolar macrophage death in response to exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa might confer an improved immune protection characterized by lower immune cell recruitment and lower tissue damages”. It could also be hypothesized that ferrostatin-1 reduces the magnitude of eicosanoid generation for mediators such as LTB4, which result in less neutrophil recruitment and less immune cell-mediated damage. Further studies to experimentally disconnect necrosis from enhanced eicosanoid generation by ExoU would be necessary to delineate the relative role in pathology. Such insight would better resolve in vivo mechanisms to inform the development of treatment strategies. These issues warrant being addressed within the Discussion.

The graphic abstract could be significantly improved to better clarify the story of ExoU impact by including time sequence as well as balanced state, hyper and hypo-lipid peroxisation states.

Reviewer #2: Bakgayoko et al., reports a fundamental aspect of host-pathogen interactions, namely the interference with signaling pathways of their host cell by intracellular pathogens. This is a carefully written and experimentally well conducted study that demonstrates the exploitation of host phospholipids by P. aeruginosa. Here the authors demonstrate, a phospholipase from P. aeruginosa, ExoU, triggers host lipid peroxidation and induces ROS mediated necrosis in the host cell. ExoU mediated necrosis is counter effected by Ferrostatin-1 further validates the hypothesis. Overall, this is an interesting study in the context of understanding the P. aeruginosa induced pathology. If the concerns listed below can be addressed, I recommend this manuscript for publication.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript presents a novel point of view about the exploitation of host oxidative mechanisms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. According to the authors. P. aeruginosa uses the endogenous basal lipid peroxidation by the virulence factor ExoU to promote cell death. The study was well conducted and shows scientific relevance.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: In aggregate this is a well-designed study with important implications. The biggest weakness lies in effectively articulating the findings. The graphic abstract is insufficient and there are some confusing statements and inconsistencies leaving the reader a little confused despite compelling data. The role of ferroptosis in all this and how it interplays with cellular necrosis is not addressed. Does ExoU interfere with ferroptosis in order to drive necrosis or is ExoU functioning at a basal non-ferroptosis state? If you trigger ferroptosis, thereby enhancing ExoU-driven necrosis, does the ferroptosis process have any consequence to the cell or is necrosis the dominant process in that context?

Reviewer #2: Major points:

1) Explain how did the authors validate successful ExoU mutation?

2) I strongly feel Figure S1 which demonstrates the effect is inflammasome independent is important result in the context of this study and suggest the data should be shown in the main text rather than in supplement.

3) What are the cellular sources of ROS production? And the source of the lipids that are susceptible for ExoU induced peroxidation. Probably, H2DCFDA and Bodipy stained immunofluorescence assay with organelle markers can address this. I understand these experiments are time consuming and if the authors feel it is out of scope of the current study, I suggest discussing couple of lines on this, based on what is known already.

4) When the effect of ExoU is suppressed by Ferrostatin-1 and Liproxstatin-1, why does the authors still refer it as necrosis and rule out the possibility of ferroptosis. Explanation needed.

5) As rExoU failed to induce lipid peroxidation (Fig 3A), I doubt the oxidized lipids could be of bacterial origin which could result in increase in ROS in host cell and collapse. I strongly suggest having an IFA read out for C11-Bodipy to locate the source of lipid peroxidation.

Reviewer #3: To improve the manuscript, I have the following suggestions:

1. The hypothesis is based on the findings presented in figure 3, which show a reduced level in oxidized lipids in cultures transfected with recombinant ExoU in comparison to the observed in non-transfected cultures.

To achieve these results, the authors performed the experiments using a 45 min time-point because at this time they did not detect any plasma membrane permeabilization by propidium iodide uptake (propidium uptake was monitored at 45 min and 3 hours). Therefore, the authors considered that, by using this time-point, they would exclude the involvemet of the ExoU-induced cell necrosis in the decrease of peroxidised phospholipids. However, Since Sato et al., (2003) have reported that ExoU is able to decrease the viability of yeast cells only 30 minutes after ExoU induction from a low copy number plasmid, the authors should show the exact time (between 45 min and 3 h) of the first signs of necrosis in their model.

2. The authors should show the levels of oxidized lipids in cultures infected with viable bacteria (ExoU+ and ExoU-) to strengthen the data obtained with recombinant ExoU.

3. Based on Figure 2E, the authors reported that ferrostatin-1 delayed the ExoU-induced cell necrosis, but did not conclude whether this effect had resulted from the ferrostatin-1 instability over time or from a lipid peroxidation-independent cell death mediated by the phospholipase activity of ExoU. Since ferrostatin1 did not interfere in bacterial viability or ExoU secretion, the authors should add fresh medium containing ferrostatin-1 to solve this question.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Line 88: a space is missing “balancein”

Line 168: and extra space is present “E xoU”

Line 236: Figure S3C is mentioned before S3B.

Line 262-264 is an incomplete sentence.

Line 325: a space is missing “toevaluate” and the word “rigger” is missing a “t” at the beginning. Furthermore, I recommend starting a new paragraph here as the authors begin describing an entirely different model system.

Line 332: This final sentence of the results is contradictory to earlier claims, “Altogether, our results identified lipid peroxidation as a pathological mechanism induced by the P. aeruginosa ExoU phospholipase both in mice and in human bronchial organoids.”. Earlier, authors make the careful point, concluded through experimentation, that ExoU does not induce lipid peroxidation, but rather exploits existing baseline lipid peroxidation to execute necrosis. This sentence undercuts that message, unless the authors are suggesting that ExoU induces lipid peroxidation in vivo but not in vitro. If that is the case, there does not seem to be specific evidence for this.

Figure S3F is confusing, the labeling says CuOOH but the legend says ferrostatin-1. From the text it seems the error occurred in the legend, as ferrostatin-1 was not involved in this experiment.

Reviewer #2: Minor points:

1) Discuss whether the other patatin family proteins play a role in the absence of ExoU?

2) Fig S2( C) What does the asterisk represents?

3) Does ExoU has a role in regulating transferrin uptake by the host cell?

Reviewer #3: 1. There are some typing mistakes, and the manuscript should be carefully revised.

2. The legend of Figure 2E describes a graphic with the time course measure of plasma membrane permeabilization using propidium iodide incorporation in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34, PP34exoU- or PP34exoUS142A in presence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 20μM). However, the figure shows only non-infected BMDM as well as PP34- and PP34exoUS142A-infected cells but no data from exoU- infected cells.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

David Skurnik, Gregory P Priebe

23 Jul 2021

Dear Dr. Meunier,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Gregory P Priebe, M.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

David Skurnik

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript entitled, “Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology” has satisfactorily addressed all previous comments and concerns. There are only a couple minor additional comments to consider:

1. Figure 3E is new microscopy data and would be more convincing with the inclusion of quantitative analysis

2. On p.8 line 252, the last word should be “form” rather than “from”.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 2

David Skurnik, Gregory P Priebe

29 Aug 2021

Dear Dr. Meunier,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Gregory P Priebe, M.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

David Skurnik

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

David Skurnik, Gregory P Priebe

8 Sep 2021

Dear Dr. Meunier,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Original immunoblotting membranes.

    (TIF)

    S2 Data. Numerical values obtained in the current study.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Fig. ExoU-dependent lung pathology in mice occurs in an inflammasome-independent manner.

    (A) Survival of WT, Casp1-/-/Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- mice intranasally infected (n = 6 animals per condition) with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34. Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. NS: Not significant using Log-rank Cox-Mantel test for survival comparisons. (B) Bronchoalveolar (BAL) and lung bacterial loads from WT, Casp1-/-/Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- mice (n = 6) 18 hours after intranasal infection with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34. Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. NS: Not significant using Mann-Whitney analysis test.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Lipid peroxidation contributes to ExoU-induced necrosis in various cell types.

    (A, B) Measure of LDH release in various human and murine cell types infected with various P. aeruginosa strains expressing or not exoU in presence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 2 hours. (C) LDH release in BMDMs transfected with recombinant ExoU (100ng) or its catalytically inactive mutant ExoUS142A, in presence of MAFP (50μM) or Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 3 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (D) Immunoblotting of ExoU secretion by P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM). Star (*) show non-specific bands. (E) Measure of bacterial growth (O.D 600) in presence or absence of ferrostatin-1 (10, 20μM) for 14 hours). (F) Measure of LDH release in Nlrc4-/- BMDMs infected with PP34 (MOI5) in presence of Ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM) for 3 hours. Each hour, fresh Ferrostatin-1 (10μM) was added to cells (+) or not (φ). “pi” refers to post-infection.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Lipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent necrosis.

    (A) ROS production in WT BMDMs transfected with ExoU or its catalytically dead mutant ExoUS142A for 45 minutes using H2DCFDA (1μM) probe. (B) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phospho)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT BMDMs infected with PP34ExoU+ or PP34ExoU- (MOI 5) for 1 hour. Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graph shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. *P≤0.05, for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (C) Lipidomic analysis of the relative amount of each phospholipid upon rExoU transfection analysed in Fig 3B. (D) Representative microscopy images and time course experiment of propidium iodide uptake in WT BMDMs transfected with rExoU or its catalytically inactive mutant ExoUS142A (500ng) in presence or not of ferrostatin-1 (Fe1, 10μM). Images show two independent experiments, each performed three times at 45 minutes or 3 hours post transfection. (E) Immunoblotting of Crispr Cas9-mediated Cypor gene deletion in immortalized (i)BMDMs or of Cypor-deficient HELA cells. The Cypor#2 (red) was selected for further analysis. GFP means that cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting Gfp and used as control. (F) Cytometry detection and quantification of (phospho)lipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in WT or Cypor-/- immortalized (i)BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then infected with PP34ExoU+ or PP34ExoU- (MOI 5) for 1 hour. Sample were acquired using FACSCalibur (BD). The graphs shows the mean+/-SEM of one experiment performed in triplicate out of three independent experiments. *P ≤ 0.05, **P≤0.001, for the indicated comparisons using t-test with Bonferroni correction. (G) Immunoblotting of Crispr Cas9-mediated Gpx4 gene deletion in immortalized BMDMs. The Gpx4#1 (red) was selected for further analysis. CD8 and GFP means that cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting Gfp or Cd8 genes and used as controls. (H) Cytometry detection and quantification of phospholipid peroxidation using the probe C11-bodipy in immortalized WT or Gpx4-/- BMDMs using a fortessa cytometer. (I) Measure of 8-iso PGF2α isprostane in cell supernatant in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) in presence or absence of Ferrostatin-1 (20μM) and then transfected with rExoU (500ng) for 3 hours. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. (J) PGE2 and LTB4 eicosanoid release in WT BMDMs pre-treated or not for 1 hour with CuOOH (20μM) and then transfected with 100ng of ExoU or its catalytically dead mutant ExoUS142A for 3 hours.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Ferrostatin-1 protects mice against ExoU-induced lung pathology.

    (A) Gating strategy to analyse Immune cell populations in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs). Immune cells were identified as CD45+ cells. Among CD45+ cells, different subset of immune cells including Interstitial/Alveolar Macrophages, Eosinophils and Neutrophils are identified based on specific cell surface marker expression.

    (TIF)

    S1 Graphical Abstract. Host lipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-induced cell necrosis-dependent pathology.

    In resting cells or in cells with induced lipid peroxidation (e.g. ferroptosis pathway), ExoU (purple) becomes hyper-activated by host cell peroxidised phospholipids, which drives an exacerbated cell necrosis, alarmin and lipid release and contributes to the subsequent pathology. Consequently, targeting lipid peroxidation (ferrostatin-1) inhibits ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and attenuates the host deleterious consequences. EM and SB used Biorender.com to create this figure.

    (TIF)

    S1 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S2 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death in presence of 20μM of ferrostatin-1 using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S3 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (MOI1) using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S4 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (MOI1) in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S5 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (MOI1) using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S6 Movie. Live cell imaging of immortalized murine Nlrc4-/- BMDMs cell death infected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa (MOI1) in presence of ferrostatin-1 (20μM) using SYTOX green.

    1 “time point” corresponds to 150s.

    (AVI)

    S7 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected human bronchial organoids using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    S8 Movie. Live cell imaging of uninfected human bronchial organoids in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    S9 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    S10 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-expressing P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    S11 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    S12 Movie. Live cell imaging of human bronchial organoids microinjected with exoU-deficient P. aeruginosa in presence of ferrostatin-1 (40μM) using Propidium Iodide up to 12 hours.

    (AVI)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Bagayoko et al.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files S1 and S2 Datas.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES