TABLE 4.
Among Women Whose Partners Used EPT and Women in the POWER Study Who Used Standard of Care | Among Women Enrolled in EPT Whose Partners Used EPT and Women Whose Partners Did Not Use EPT | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPT Study* | POWER Study† | Partner Used EPT | Partner Did Not Use EPT | |||||||||
Organism | n | IR | n | IR | IRR (95% CI) | P | n | IR | n | IR | IRR (95% CI) | P |
C. trachomatis | 9 | 43.58 | 22 | 44.26 | 0.98 (0.40–2.23) | 0.49 | 9 | 43.58 | 3 | 71.25 | 0.61 (0.15–3.51) | 0.23 |
N. gonorrhoeae | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 7.71 | 0.00 (0.00–6.52) | 0.15 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 23.31 | 0.00 (0.00–78.9) | 0.08 |
Total | 9 | 21.52 | 24 | 31.73 | 0.68 (0.28–1.51) | 0.16 | 9 | 21.52 | 4 | 47.06 | 0.46 (0.13–2.03) | 0.11 |
Comparison in STI incidence was made among only the Kisumu POWER AGYW.
*AGYW offered EPT and partner received and used EPT.
†AGYW were not offered EPT.
IR, incidence rate per 100 woman years; IRR, incident rate ratio; n, number of new infections.