Table 3.
Response to treatment at 3 months and 6 months after randomisation
| Psychoeducation | Exposure and response prevention | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | |||
| Patients randomly assigned | 112 | 112 | .. |
| 3 months | |||
| Patients with available follow-up data | 100 | 101 | .. |
| CGI-I score indicating much or very much improved (responded to treatment) | 20 (20%) | 36 (36%) | 2·22 (1·17–4·20) |
| 6 months | |||
| Patients with available follow-up data | 93 | 93 | .. |
| CGI-I score indicating much or very much improved (responded to treatment) | 27 (29%) | 44 (47%) | 2·20 (1·20–4·04) |
| Change in response between 3 and 6 months | |||
| Patients with available follow-up data | 93 | 90 | .. |
| No response to treatment at either time | 56 (60%) | 37 (41%) | .. |
| Response at both times | 9 (10%) | 23 (26%) | .. |
| New responder at 6 months | 18 (19%) | 20 (22%) | .. |
| Relapsed responder at 6 months | 10 (11%) | 10 (11%) | .. |
Data are n or n (%). Statistical models were adjusted for site. Percentages are calculated by how many participants were still being followed up at each timepoint and for whom follow-up data were available (ie, completion of questionnaires or outcome measures). CGI-I=Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement.