Table 2. A tabulated summary of the Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias tool.
Newcastle-Ottawa criteria (Yes, No, Uncertain) | Khoja et al. 2017 [17] | Mirhoseini et al. 2018 [18] | Krishnaswamy et al. 2019 [23] | Shamy et al. 2020 [32] | Kaminska et al. 2020 [25] | Fite et al. 2020 [33] |
Representative of the exposed cohort | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain |
Selection of external control | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain |
Ascertainment of exposure | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Outcome of interest not present at the start of the study | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Comparability of main factor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Comparability of additional factor | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Yes | Uncertain |
Assessment of outcome | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sufficient follow-up time | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Adequacy of follow-up | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Our evaluation | 6/9 (Medium quality) | 6/9 (Medium quality) | 6/9 (Medium quality) | 6/9 (Medium quality) | 7/9 (Medium quality) | 6/9 (Medium quality) |