Table 1.
Comparisons | Estimate | Odds Ratio | Std. Error | t ratio | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control vs Bright white | − 0.396 | 0.673 | 0.06 | − 6.58 | < 0.0001*** |
Control vs Dimmed white | − 0.198 | 0.82 | 0.059 | − 3.375 | 0.0102** |
Control vs Blue | − 0.212 | 0.809 | 0.059 | − 3.571 | 0.0051** |
Control vs Green | − 0.218 | 0.804 | 0.058 | − 3.77 | 0.0025** |
Control vs Red | 0.018 | 1.018 | 0.06 | 0.296 | 0.9997 |
Bright white vs Dimmed white | 0.198 | 1.219 | 0.06 | 3.295 | 0.0132** |
Bright white vs Blue | 0.183 | 1.201 | 0.061 | 3.01 | 0.0324* |
Bright white vs Green | 0.178 | 1.195 | 0.059 | 2.99 | 0.0343* |
Bright white vs Red | 0.414 | 1.513 | 0.061 | 6.735 | < 0.0001*** |
Dimmed white vs Blue | − 0.015 | 0.985 | 0.059 | − 0.246 | 0.9999 |
Dimmed white vs Green | − 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.058 | − 0.353 | 0.9993 |
Dimmed white vs Red | 0.216 | 1.241 | 0.06 | 3.598 | 0.0047** |
Blue vs Green | − 0.006 | 0.994 | 0.059 | − 0.099 | 1 |
Blue vs Red | 0.23 | 1.259 | 0.061 | 3.788 | 0.0023** |
Green vs Red | 0.236 | 1.266 | 0.059 | 3.986 | 0.0011** |
Negative estimates indicate that bird numbers decreased in the presence of illumination compared to control periods. Estimates taken from the GAM (spectra experiment) show log-transformed differences in counted birds. For example, bright white caused a (0.67 – 1) * 100% = -33% decrease in counted birds when we turned on the light compared to control pair (‘light-off’, ‘light-off’). Significant results are marked in bold. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05.