Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;185:111287. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111287

Table 1.

Summary of fit statistics for latent profile models based on 13 coping strategies measured by Brief COPE.

Model LL # FP AIC BIC SABIC Entropy aLMRT p(aLMRT) BLRT p(BLRT) Smallest
profile (%)
1 profile −31,993.01 26 64,038.02 64,173.37 64,090.78
2 profiles −31,176.17 40 62,432.33 62,640.56 62,513.49 0.791 1617.66 < 0.001 1633.69 < 0.001 30.2
3 profiles −30,786.66 54 61,681.33 61,962.43 61,790.90 0.856 771.36 0.350 779.01 < 0.001 15.4
4 profiles −30,313.32 68 60,762.63 61,116.61 60,900.61 0.904 937.40 < 0.001 946.70 < 0.001 4.0
5 profiles −30,054.82 82 60,273.63 60,700.49 60,440.01 0.859 511.93 0.002 517.00 < 0.001 4.0

Note. LL – log-likelihood; # FP – number of free parameters; AIC – Akaike information criterion; BIC – Bayesian information criterion; SABIC – sample-adjusted BIC; aLMRT – adjusted Lo-Mendel-Rubin likelihood ratio test; BLRT – bootstrap likelihood ratio test.