Table 5.
Hypothesized relationships | Unstandardized coefficient | S.E. | C.R. | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1: ESM→NFPD | 0.34** | 0.13 | 2.60 | Supported |
H2: ESM→EFPD | 0.36*** | 0.08 | 4.20 | Supported |
H3: PSM→NFPD | 0.22** | 0.07 | 3.03 | Supported |
H4: PSM→EFPD | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.57 | Not -supported |
H5: NFPD→DP | 0.15** | 0.05 | 2.98 | Supported |
H6: EFPD→DP | 0.27*** | 0.08 | 3.37 | Supported |
Control variables: | ||||
Gender→DP | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.19 | |
Age→DP | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.23 | |
Education→DP | −0.16* | 0.08 | −2.00 | |
SM-UE→DP | 0.10 | 0.09 | 1.15 | |
SM-UF→DP | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 |
ESM, Enterprise social media; PSM, Public social media; NFPD, Novelty-focused product design; EFPD, Efficiency-focused product design; DP, Designer performance; SM-UE, Social media usage experience; SM-UF, Social media usage frequency;
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.