Table 3.
Heterogeneity Analysis of the Impact of Financial Literacy by Wealth, Age and Financial Positions
Panel A: Heterogeneity analysis by non-housing wealth level | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Dep. Var. = Help from profl/other non family advisors (0/1) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Non-housing Wealth<Median | Non-housing Wealth>Median | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
(1) Probit | (2) IVProbit | (3) Probit | (4) IVProbit | ||||||
FinLit score | 0.059 | 0.034 | ** | 0.045 | 0.043 | ** | |||
(0.483) | (0.001) | (0.133) | (0.004) | ||||||
| |||||||||
N | 136 | 136 | 308 | 308 | |||||
Pseudo R-sq/Log likelihood | 0.549 | −188.9 | 0.186 | −486.5 | |||||
| |||||||||
Panel B: Heterogeneity analysis by age group | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Help from profl/other non family advisors (0/1) | |||||||||
| |||||||||
below Age 65 | Age 65–74 | Age 75+ | |||||||
| |||||||||
(1) Probit | (2) IVProbit | (3) Probit | (4) IVProbit | (5) Probit | (6) IVProbit | ||||
FinLit score | 0.054 | 0.057 | * | 0.001 | 0.012 | ** | 0.090 | 0.056 | ** |
(0.178) | (0.016) | (0.645) | (0.000) | (0.182) | (0.000) | ||||
| |||||||||
N | 223 | 223 | 91 | 88 | 130 | 122 | |||
Pseudo R-sq/Log likelihood | 0.328 | −328.9 | 0.621 | −102.9 | 0.349 | −204.5 | |||
| |||||||||
Panel C: Heterogeneity analysis by respondents’ financial positions | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Dep. Var. = Help from profl/other non family advisors (0/1) | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||
High complexity = 1 | High complexity = 0 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
(1) Probit | (2) IVProbit | (3) Probit | (4) IVProbit | ||||||
FinLit score | 0.081 | * | 0.125 | ** | 0.028 | 0.024 | ** | ||
(0.025) | (0.000) | (0.385) | (0.000) | ||||||
| |||||||||
N | 80 | 77 | 364 | 364 | |||||
Pseudo R-sq/Log likelihood | 0.281 | −118.9 | 0.351 | −558.1 |
This table replicates the results of Table 2, columns 5–6, by non-housing wealth (Panel A), age groups (Panel B), and respondents’ financial positions (Panel C). Estimated marginal effects of control variables are omitted for brevity. See Appendix 1 for variable definitions. Regressors include missing data controls. p-values for the estimated coefficients’ Z-statistics based on clustered standard errors at the household level are reported in parentheses. * and ** represent statistical significance at 5% and 1% level, respectively.