Table 3.

Results of hypothesis: path coefficients and statistical significance (n=5000 subsamples).^a

Hypothesis	β (coefficient path)	t statistic	P value	Supported
H1: Perceived ease of use → Perceived usefulness	.203	2.810	.005	Yesb
H2: Perceived ease of use → Attitude toward using	.179	2.623	.009	Yesb
H3: Perceived usefulness → Attitude toward using	.755	12.888	<.001	Yesc
H4: Perceived usefulness → Behavioral intention to use	.415	3.442	.001	Yesc
H5: Attitude toward using → Behavioral intention to use	.301	2.299	.02	Yesb
H6: Health benefits → Perceived usefulness	.448	4.010	<.001	Yesc
H7: Health benefits → Perceived ease of use	.640	14.948	<.001	Yesc
H8: Promotion of health → Health benefits	.865	29.943	<.001	Yesc
H9: Promotion of health → Behavioral intention to use	.210	2.108	.03	Yesd
H10: Promotion Of Health → Perceived usefulness	.281	2.393	.01	Yesb

^aFor 5000 subsamples, we used a t distribution (4999) of students in single queue.

^bP<.01 (t_0.01;499=2.333843952).

^cP<.001 (t_0.001;499=3.106644601).

^dP<.05 (t_0.05;499=1.64791345).