Table 7.

PLS^a–SEM^b results with moderator (gender).

Hypothesis	β (Coefficient path)	P value	Support
H1: Perceived ease of use → Perceived usefulness	–.422	.01	Yesc
H2: Perceived ease of use → Attitude toward using	–.100	.24	No
H3: Perceived usefulness → Attitude toward using	.318	.18	No
H4: Perceived usefulness → Behavioral intention to use	.166	.21	No
H5: Attitude toward using → Behavioral intention to use	–.107	.49	No
H6: Health benefits → Perceived usefulness	.266	.11	No
H7: Health benefits → Perceived ease of use	.003	.94	No
H8: Promotion of health → Health benefits	–.318	.22	No
H9: Promotion of health → Behavioral intention to use	–.239	.04	Yesc
H10: Promotion of health → Perceived usefulness	.178	.01	Yesc

^aPLS: partial least squares.

^bSEM: structural equation modeling.

^cFor 500 subsamples, we used a t distribution (4999) of students in a single queue: P<.05 (t_0.05;4999=1.64791345).