Fig. 2D aSyn and pSyn Protein |
2-way ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of ASO (asyn) |
F(1,29) = 74.33 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
ASO Staus (ASO/Scramble) |
Main effect of ASO (psyn) |
F(1,29) = 35.88 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
Fig. 2E pSyn Inclusions: Composite Score |
Independent Samples t-test |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) |
Main effect of ASO |
t(65) = 2.280 |
p = 0.0259 |
Fig. 2E pSyn Inclusions: Motor Cortex |
Independent Samples t-test |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) |
No effects |
t(15) = 1.117 |
p = 0.281 |
Fig. 2E pSyn Inclusions: Hippocampus |
Independent Samples t-test |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) |
No effects |
t(14) = 1.067 |
p = 0.304 |
Fig. 2E pSyn Inclusions: Medial Somatosensory Cortex |
Independent Samples t-test |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) |
No effects |
t(15) = 1.145 |
p = 0.270 |
Fig. 2E pSyn Inclusions: Lateral Somatosensory Cortex |
Independent Samples t-test |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) |
No effects |
t(15) = 1.022 |
p = 0.23 |
Fig. 3B-C Water Maze Cumulative Distance during Hidden Platform Location |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF |
F(8.472,245.702) = 2.025 |
p = 0.041 |
Greenhouse-Geisser |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Main effect of PFF |
F(1,29) = 6.638 |
p = 0.015 |
|
|
|
Time x ASO |
F(8.472,245.702) = 2.626 |
p = 0.008 |
Greenhouse-Geisser |
Fig. 3B-C Water Maze Cumulative Distance during Visible Platform Location |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x ASO |
F(7.527,218.278) = 3.705 |
p = 0.001 |
Greenhouse-Geisser |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 3E Water Maze Change in Cumulative Distance to Hidden Platform Locations |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of PFF |
F(1,29) = 4.159 |
p = 0.05 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 3E Water Maze Change in Cumulative Distance to Visible Platform Locations |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of ASO |
F(1,29) = 7.049 |
p = 0.012 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 3F Water MazeCumulative Distance during Probe Trials |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF |
F(4.283,124.217) = 3.257 |
p = 0.005 |
Greenhouse-Geisser |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Main effect of PFF |
F(1,29) = 9.372 |
p = 0.012 |
Greenhouse-Geisser |
Fig. 3G Water Maze Percent Time in Target Quadrant during Probe Trials |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF |
F(7,203) = 3.353 |
p = 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Main effect of PFF |
F(1,29) = 8.043 |
p = 0.008 |
|
|
|
Time x ASO |
F(7,203) = 2.083 |
p = 0.047 |
Fig. 4B Total Distance Moved in the Open Field |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF x ASO |
F(1,29) = 5.637 |
p = 0.024 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Average Velocity in the Open Field |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF x ASO |
F(1,29) = 5.533 |
p = 0.026 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 4C Novel Object 3 mpi |
Paired Samples t-test |
Object (Familiar/Novel) |
Mono-Scramble |
t(50) = 5.632 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
Mono-ASO |
t(50) = 4.706 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
PFF-Scramble |
t(50) = 6.796 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
PFF-ASO |
t(50) = 6.713 |
p < 0.0001 |
Sidak’s |
Fig. 4D Novel Object 6 mpi |
Paired Samples t-test |
Object (Familiar/Novel) |
Mono-Scramble |
t(52) = 4.206 |
p = 0.0004 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
Mono-ASO |
t(52) = 1.845 |
p = 0.2541 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
PFF-Scramble |
t(52) = 1.945 |
p = 0.2099 |
Sidak’s |
|
|
|
PFF-ASO |
t(52) = 3.462 |
p = 0.0043 |
Sidak’s |
Fig. 5B Latency to Fall off the Rotarod |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x ASO |
F(3,87) = 16.145 |
p < 0.0001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 5C Wire Hang Latency to Fall |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of ASO |
F(1,26) = 21.388 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Time x ASO |
F(1,26) = 11.936 |
p = 0.002 |
|
|
|
PFF x ASO |
F(1,26) = 6.030 |
p = 0.021 |
Fig. 5C Wire Hang Fall Score |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of ASO |
F(1,26) = 13.826 |
p = 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Time x ASO |
F(1,26) = 12.923 |
p = 0.002 |
|
|
|
Trend towards main effect of PFF |
F(1,26) = 3.739 |
p = 0.064 |
Fig. 5E Wire Hang Fall Score over Time 3 mpi |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
No effects |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 5F Wire Hang Fall Score over Time 6 mpi |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Main effect of ASO |
F(1,26) = 20.089 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Time x ASO |
F(35,910) = 6.087 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
|
Time x PFF |
F(35,910) = 3.409 |
p < 0.001 |
Fig. 5G Wire Hang Latency to Reach |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
No effects |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 5H Wire Hang Reach Score |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Trend towards main effect of PFF |
F(1,26) = 3.250 |
p = 0.084 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 5I Wire Hang Reach Score over Time 3 mpi |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x PFF |
F(35,980) = 3.195 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 5J Wire Hang Reach Score over Time 6 mpi |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x ASO |
F(35,910) = 5.116 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Time x PFF x ASO |
F(35,910) = 4.036 |
p < 0.001 |
|
|
|
PFF x ASO |
F(1,26) = 6.770 |
p = 0.015 |
|
|
|
Trend towards main effect of ASO |
F(1,26) = 3.995 |
p = 0.056 |
Fig. 6A Average Daytime Activity |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x ASO |
F(1.703,34.060) = 3.550 |
p = 0.046 |
Huynh-Feldt |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 6B Average Nighttime Activity |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Trend towards a Time x ASO interaction |
F(3,60) = 2.316 |
p = 0.085 |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Fig. 6C Body Weight |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
Time x ASO |
F(3.613,104.777) = 16.093 |
p < 0.001 |
Huynh-Feldt |
|
|
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Main effect of ASO |
F(1,29) = 7.952 |
p < 0.001 |
Fig. 6D Food Intake |
2-way ANOVA |
PFF Status (PFF/Mono) |
No effects (Daytime) |
|
|
ASO Staus (ASO/Scramble) |
Main effect of ASO (Nighttime) |
F(1,26) = 5.297 |
p = 0.0296 |
Fig. 6F Body Weight in aSyn KO mice |
Repeated Measures ANOVA |
ASO Status (ASO/Scramble) Time |
Time x ASO |
F(16,88) = 6.079 |
p = 0.0001 |
|
|
|
Main effect of ASO |
F(2,11) = 19.03 |
p = 0.0003 |