A positive experience |
|
Perceived benefits |
|
Hike logistics |
Participants suggested that prior to hikes, we ensure parking access, availability of toilets and locate the hikes closer to participants’ homes.
Others suggested that we consider organising carpools and/or covering gas/mileage costs.
|
Difficulty of hikes |
|
Location of hikes |
Nature group: One participant wished that there was more of a ‘reward’ (‘like a waterfall’, ‘when you have a view, it seems more profound’), because some were just ‘walks through the woods’.
Urban group: One person noted that some neighbourhoods were ‘sketchy’ and they were ‘constantly walking around garbage’ for one hike. Others noted that they really enjoyed exploring different neighbourhoods, areas around sports stadium and learning about the history of areas.
|
Group composition |
|
Incentives for completing questionnaires |
|
Assessments |
Several participants had trouble with the online software (eg, getting ‘kicked out’ of the survey mid-way through).
Some participants reported that they would have liked text prompts instead of email, since they did not regularly check their email.
Some participants found some questions to be difficult to answer (eg, the Perceived Cohesion Scale) or they were confused by differences in the time frame for different instruments (eg, on the weekly questionnaires, some questions asked participants how they felt ‘right now’ while others asked about the prior week).
|
Activity monitors |
|
Fostering interaction/connections between participants in a group |
Participants suggested facilitating more structured ways to get to know other members of the group, including a social gathering prior to the initial hike, reintroductions before each hike, gathering for lunch or other meal after hikes and organising a social media group.
|