Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 9;10(5):232–243. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.232

Table 2.

Exercise capacity and self-perceived health status before lung resection


Low-risk group, n = 35
High-risk group, n = 40
Control group, n = 32
F
Exercise capacity
FSS 19.72 (12.99) 28 (19.49) 9.00 16.469 1a,b,c,1
Lower limb assessment
Hand-held dynamometry 107.24 (51.59) 112.31 (47.99) 213.01 (60.58) 43.669 1b,c,1
5STS Dyspnea baseline 0.41 (1.33) 0.32 (1.12) 0 1.478
LL fatigue baseline 0.36 (1.20) 1.23 (2.38) 0 5.829 1a,c,1
Time 12.43 (4.49) 18.23 (14.27) 9.87 (2.66) 8.202 1a,b,c,1
Dyspnea post-test 1.03 (1.98) 0.86 (1.79) 0 4.098b,c
LL fatigue post-test 0.72 (1.57) 1.77 (2.94) 0 7.297 1a,b,c,1
Upper limb assessment
Handgrip dynamometry 329.46 (93.08) 291.57 (117.29) 380 (79.31) 7.178 1b,c,1
UULEX test Dyspnea baseline 0.44 (1.50) 0.38 (1.03) 0 1.64c
UL Fatigue baseline 1.00 (1.59) 1.13 (1.82) 0 6.322 1b,c,1
Time 442.50 (230.69) 187.50 (201.80) 555.00 (124.75) 23.245 1a,b,c,1
Dyspnea post-test 2.19 (2.54) 0.88 (1.59) 0.25 (0.98) 7.439 1b,1
UL Fatigue post-test 6.56 (2.19) 6.38 (2.19) 5.50 (2.66) 1.283
Self-perceived health status
EQ-5D-5L VAS 86.81 (16.99) 66.23 (22.94) 94.69 (4.91) 23.147 1a,c,1
EQ-5D-5L index 1.00 0.76 (0.43) 1.00 11.238a,b,c

Variables are expressed as mean (SD).

a

Significant differences between low-risk and high-risk groups.

b

Significant differences between low-risk group and control group.

c

Significant differences between high-risk group and control group.

1

Global P value adjusted by multiplicity. 5STS: Five sit-to-stand test; EQ-5D-5L: Euroqol 5 dimensions 5 levels; FSS: Fatigue severity scale; LL: Lower limb; UL: Upper limb; UULEX: Unsupported upper-limb exercise; VAS: Visual analogue scale.