Table 1.
Ref.
|
Study type
|
Clavicle cases/total cases
|
Initial fracture treatment
|
Device
|
Energy level
|
Sessions
|
Outcome
|
Moretti et al[29], 2009 | Retrospective case series | NM/204 | NM | Minilith SL1 (Storz) | 0.22-1.10 mJ/mm2 | NM | Positive |
Carfagni et al[31], 2011 | Retrospective case series | 3/93 | NM | Duolith (Storz), Modulith SLK (Storz) | 0.20-0.55 mJ/mm2 | 4-5 | NM |
Vulpiani et al[30], 2012 | Prospective cohort study | 6/143 | Conservative treatment and Internal fixation | Modulith SLK (Storz) | 0.25-0.84 mJ/mm2 | 3-5 | NM |
Alkhawashki[28], 2015 | Retrospective case series | 1/49 | Conservative treatment | OssaTron (HMT) | 26 KV | 1 | Positive |
Kertzman et al[7], 2017 | Retrospective case series | 1/22 | Internal fixation | Swiss DolorClast (EMS) | 0.18 mJ/mm2 | 2 | Negative |
NM: Not mentioned.