Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases cause severe impairments in cognitive and motor function. With an increasing aging population and the onset of these diseases between 50 and 70 years, the consequences are bound to be devastating. While age and longevity are the main risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases, sex is also an important risk factor. The characteristic of sex is multifaceted, encompassing sex chromosome complement, sex hormones (estrogens and androgens), and sex hormone receptors. Sex hormone receptors can induce various signaling cascades, ranging from genomic transcription to intracellular signaling pathways that are dependent on the health of the cell. Oxidative stress, associated with aging, can impact the health of the cell. Sex hormones can be neuroprotective under low oxidative stress conditions but not in high oxidative stress conditions. An understudied sex hormone receptor that can induce activation of oxidative stress signaling is the membrane androgen receptor (mAR). mAR can mediate nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (NOX)-generated oxidative stress that is associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease. Further complicating this is that aging can alter sex hormone signaling. Prior to menopause, women experience more estrogens than androgens. During menopause, this sex hormone profile switches in women due to the dramatic ovarian loss of 17β-estradiol with maintained ovarian androgen (testosterone, androstenedione) production. Indeed, aging men have higher estrogens than aging women due to aromatization of androgens to estrogens. Therefore, higher activation of mAR-NOX signaling could occur in menopausal women compared with aged men, mediating the observed sex differences. Understanding of these signaling cascades could provide therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative diseases.
Keywords: membrane androgen receptor, AR45, oxidative stress, testosterone, estrogen, angiotensin
Oxidative stress is an imbalance between damaging pro-oxidants, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), and antioxidants. This dysregulation can lead to cellular dysfunction and cell loss. Oxidative stress is a common feature in several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease (AD), Parkinson disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and multiple sclerosis (MS) (1, 2). Notably, sex differences are observed in each of these diseases (Fig. 1). Currently, only palliative care is available as treatment for these neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, understanding sex-specific disease processes may lead to potential individualized therapeutic targets.
Figure 1.
Several neurodegenerative diseases that are associated with oxidative stress exhibit sex differences. Men have a higher incidence of Parkinson disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, while Alzheimer disease and multiple sclerosis shows a greater incidence in women. Huntington disease affects men and women equally.
Alzheimer disease accounts for 60% to 80% of dementia cases, and in the United States there are currently 5.8 million individuals with AD aged 65 and older (3). Women with dementia/AD outnumber men 2 to 1 and suffer more severe pathology due to neurofibrillary tangles and faster cognitive declines. Common AD pathological features include Amyloid β (Aβ) and Tau, which can be recapitulated in several rodent models, such as the 3XTg-AD mice (4). Studies that have measured Aβ disposition in these mice reported finding 3 to 4 times more in the hippocampi and amygdalae of 6- and 12-month-old female mice than in males of the same age (4). Additionally, in rodents, depletion of estrogen and progesterone after ovariectomy was associated with increased memory deficits and accelerated AD pathology compared with their sham-treated (intact) counterparts (4-6). Clinical studies that measured AD biomarkers with positron emission tomography found higher densities of Tau tangles in women (4). Apoliproteins E are involved in cholesterol homeostasis and the corresponding gene APOE is polymorphic within the central nervous system. The well-known E4 variant is the largest genetic risk factor for AD (7-10), with studies reporting some variation in risk level based on ethnicity (11). The aforementioned age and sex risk factors can converge onto the genetic risk factor, placing particular populations at even greater risk (12). Females carrying the APOE4 allele (major genetic risk factor for AD that is involved in cholesterol homeostasis) have more rapid cognitive declines and score worse on memory tasks than APOE4-carrying males (4, 6, 13, 14). A clinical study examining human brains found a significantly higher percentage of women carrying the APOE4 allele and had higher levels of AD pathology in the temporal and neocortical regions (15). Interestingly, sex hormones influence AD pathology based on evidence from studies comparing AD incidence in women that had undergone surgical and natural menopause (15). Women classified under surgical menopause suffered a greater AD pathology burden compared with women undergoing natural menopause, due to AD symptoms occurring at a younger age, and they exhibited higher density of Tau tangles and Aβ compared with men (15). In contrast, studies investigating the male sex hormones, androgens, have found a relationship with low testosterone levels and AD pathology (5, 6). In postmortem neuropathology studies, it was determined that AD was associated with low estrogens in women and low androgens in men (6, 16). In addition, in early AD, Aβ levels were inversely correlated with brain testosterone levels, supporting the hypothesis that decreased testosterone in men may increase the development of AD (6). However, other studies have not shown this association, as evidenced by a lack of cognitive improvement in older men when given testosterone supplements in the Testosterone Trials (TTrials) (17). Alarmingly, testosterone can increase oxidative stress (18-20) and oxidative stress–associated conditions (21), facilitating testosterone’s negative effect on cognition (22) due to the negative effects of androgens in an oxidative stress environment (18-20, 23-25).
Parkinson disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by an α-synuclein (αS) pathology and deficiency of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (26-28). PD cases typically occur sporadically with only ~10% of cases associated with genetic mutations (26, 29). While men have twice the risk of developing PD and have more severe onset symptoms than women, women have a higher mortality rate and overall faster disease progression (26-29). Women are more likely to develop postural instability leading to increased falling with PD progression, whereas men develop a frozen gait and camptocormia (an axial postural deformity that occurs when standing) (26). Preclinical studies have used the tetramer abrogation mouse model known as the 3K transgenic strain (30, 31). The 3K mice mimic PD pathology by showing a progressive loss of aggregate resistant tetramers and an excess of αS monomers that accumulate, leading to various cortical and dopaminergic neurite loss (30, 31). The 3K mice exhibit significantly poorer performance in motor behavioral tests than regular wild-type mice (31). The study also reported sex differences, in which the 3K male mice performed more poorly across all motor tests as compared with the female mice; this difference was attributed to increased estrogen in female mice (31). Indeed, premenopausal estrogen has been associated with decreased oxidative stress generation via one of the main cellular oxidative stress generators, NADPH oxidase (NOX), and the loss of estrogen during menopause results in increased oxidative stress and PD risk (32). However, postmenopausal women continue to produce androgens (testosterone, androstenedione) (33-39), which can also increase NOX activation (25, 40, 41).
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is caused by a progressive degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord, leading to an inability to perform voluntary motor movements that usually leads to death within 2 to 5 years (42). The main 2 factors that impact ALS risk are diet and sex: men are 2 to 3 times more susceptible to ALS and exhibit a more severe progression than premenopausal women (42). Postmenopausal women are just as likely to develop ALS with a similar progression to men (42). This observation supports the hypothesis that sex hormones may be key contributing factors to ALS occurrences (42). Preclinical work has focused on the use of a mouse strain, the SOD1 G37R strain, which exhibits ALS symptoms with a progressive loss of neuromuscular junctions in early onset, leading to a universal degeneration of motor axons and axonal sprouting within the motor cell (43-45). Interestingly, female SOD1 mice have a higher level of axonal sprouting than male SOD1 mice, which was associated with worsened grip strength, higher neuromuscular junction degeneration, and decreased motor neuron survival (45).
Multiple sclerosis is a disease that involves both the immune system and central nervous system, both of which are associated with sex differences (46). Women are more susceptible to MS and have an earlier onset, while men tend to have a longer MS progression and suffer greater cognitive decline if they have the APOE4 allele (46). The female to male ratio varies depending on geographic region from 2:1 to 3:1 (46), with a speculative rise in women attributed to gene-environment interactions or epigenetic factors (46). In animal models, astrocytes regulating the course of inflammation may play a key role in sex differences (28). Male and female mice have different neuroinflammatory responses that may explain how each sex adapts to the symptoms of MS (28). Usually, there is a higher degree of inflammation in women but more neurodegenerative lesions in males (46).
Sex Hormones
Sex hormones, such as androgens (eg, testosterone) and estrogens (eg, 17β-estradiol), are well-studied hormones that can have diverse and systemic effects via their widely distributed cognate receptors. These diverse effects range from cellular protection via their anti-oxidative stress properties (47, 48) to cellular toxicity via their pro-oxidative stress properties (18-20, 23, 24). In the brain, sex hormones impact various signaling pathways, including catecholaminergic (dopamine, norepinephrine) neurons and basal forebrain cholinergic (acetylcholine) systems (49), which regulate many behavioral functions (eg, cognitive function, motor control, emotion, neuroimmune responses, social behaviors, arousal, and responsiveness to environment or stressors) (50-54). The impact of sex hormones on these neurotransmitter pathways could mediate sex differences in several neurodegenerative diseases (24).
Sex hormones are also known as gonadal hormones, as they are typically produced in the gonads, with additional generation in the brain, adrenal glands, and other tissues (49, 55-57). Testosterone, the major male sex hormone, is metabolized into 17β-estradiol and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) through aromatase and 5-alpha-reductase, respectively, or into androstenedione by CYP3A4. Androstenedione can undergo further metabolism with aromatase, ultimately forming 17β-estradiol or 5-alpha-reductase producing 5-alpha-androsterone (55, 58). 17β-estradiol, the major female sex hormone originating from the ovaries, can be metabolized to estrone, converted to estriol, and excreted in the urine. Metabolic interconversions of circulating estrogens are constantly in flux. Production of androgens and estrogens are regulated via negative feedback regulation that acts at the level of the brain, pituitary gland, and gonads (59).
Sex hormones are present throughout the lifespan of an organism, including prenatal development, puberty, and aging (60-63). The aging of the reproductive function is characterized by a loss of gonadal function. For men, this occurs as a slow progressive decline in tandem with a decrease in testicular function over time, resulting in a gradual decrease of testosterone that is approximately 1% testosterone loss/year of age after 30 years of age (ie, andropause) (64-66). In women, this change is a more rapid decline of sex hormones compared with that in men, occurring generally around 50 years of age and resulting in a precipitous decrease of estrogen (ie, menopause). In addition to decreasing gonadal hormone levels in males and females, aging can also alter the gonadal hormone profiles. Generally, estrogen is higher in women than in men. However, aged men have higher estrogen levels than aged women due to the aromatization of testosterone (16, 67). Additionally, postmenopausal women are in an androgenic state, as ovaries in postmenopausal women continue to produce androgens (testosterone, androstenedione) (33-39), irrespective of the loss of ovarian estrogen production (57, 68-74). Although loss of estrogen during the postmenopausal state is generally associated with increased risk for neurodegeneration in women, androgens may also play a role, as postmenopausal women exhibit an androgen sex hormone profile.
Sex Chromosome Complement
At the physiological level, the sexual dimorphism of aging often involves changes in sex hormone levels, regulated by the endocrine system, which affects the systemic homeostasis and the interplay between cells and organs (75). At the genetic level, sexual dimorphism is shown in biological sex differences that are predetermined by sex chromosome complement. Mammalian females possess 2 copies of X chromosomes (XX) while the male counterparts possess an X copy and a Y copy (XY). Different genetic makeups lead to different physiological makeups, with the presence or absence of testes or ovaries in males and females, resulting in the prevalence of one sex hormone over another (76).
On average, the life expectancy for women is longer than that for men (77, 78), which is true throughout the animal kingdom (79). Genetic manipulation creating mice (“four core genotype”: FCG) with either XX or XY chromosomes, each with either ovary or testes, allows investigators to uncouple the effects of sex chromosomes and sex hormones. The XX chromosome mice have a longer lifespan compared with XY mice; the presence of ovaries lengthens the lifespan of XX mice but bears no effect on XY mice (80). This leads to the hypothesis that gonadal hormones have protective effects against aging in the presence of a second X chromosome (80).
Sexually dimorphic genetic factors (sex chromosomes X and Y) can readily and differentially influence the makeup and activity of male and female brains, prior to the expression of gonadal hormones (81). The FCG model demonstrates that sex chromosome genes directly influence sexual dimorphism in behaviors, gene expression, and susceptibility to diseases (82-85). As a result, it is reasonable to speculate that genes on sex chromosomes can influence the states of neurological pathology at the molecular level, such as neurotransmitter biosynthesis, central nervous system enzyme expression (86), and synaptic transmission (87).
Abnormalities in sex chromosome complement contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders. For instance, the lack of an X chromosome is associated with Turner syndrome in females as well as susceptibility to autism in males (88) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (89); an extra Y chromosome is found in children diagnosed with ADHD (90). An extra X chromosome may be linked to executive and behavioral dysfunctions in children (91). However, the relationship between sex chromosome complement and neurodegeneration is unclear.
Several discoveries have been recently made and provide new venues to study sex-chromosome-specific neural impairments. A 2019 study using sex-stratified genome-wide association studies of deceased patients diagnosed with AD found that the scope of the genetic risk factor for AD expanded beyond the APOE gene region and into the sex-specific chromosome 7 (rs34331204) associated with neurofibrillary tangles only in males (13). X chromosome aneuploidy in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of AD patients was increased from 1.32% in controls to 2.79% in AD patients, although such low levels of occurrence are not likely to play a major role in AD incidence (92). Similarly in PD, the chromosomal culprits of tremor and Parkinsonism are associated with sex chromosomes (93). The Y chromosome gene, SRY (Sex-determining Region found on the Y chromosome) is suspected to be involved in PD pathology (94, 95). SRY protein expression has been found in the hypothalamus, frontal and temporal cortex (96, 97), midbrain (98), and ventral tegmental area (99) of adult men. SRY gene products regulate the expression of other proteins involved in dopamine biosynthesis and metabolism (99). SRY is upregulated in PD animal and cell culture models while the suppression of SRY expression mitigates the neurodegeneration and motor impairments (94). On the other hand, an X-chromosome-wide association study in 2021 revealed a potential role of X chromosomes in PD pathology. There are at least 2 genome-wide significant loci on the X chromosome, rs7066890 and rs28602900, that are associated with PD risk (100).
Increased sex chromosome aneuploidy is often associated with aging (101) neurodegeneration, including AD (92). Loss of both sex chromosomes is age-dependent (102). It is hypothesized that the loss of the Y chromosome is a marker of age-related effects (103). Mounting evidence has also pointed toward the abnormal frequency of X chromosome aneuploidy contributing to AD. Together, these findings suggest that sex chromosome aneuploidy may contribute to the pathology of sex-specific or sex-biased neurodegeneration and brain aging.
Oxidative Stress
At low to moderate levels, ROS act as important molecules in signal transduction pathways, promote cell differentiation, and play an important role in host immune defense against pathogens (104, 105). Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between oxidants and protective antioxidant systems due to an excess in ROS levels (106) leading to posttranslational chemical modifications to macromolecules (eg, nucleic acids, proteins, lipids) causing cellular damage (107-109). The brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress because of its high oxygen demand, relatively low concentration of antioxidants, and high concentration of easily oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acids and redox-active metal ions (110). Therefore, oxidative stress has been proposed as an important mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases such as AD, PD, ALS, and MS (1, 2, 111). Of note, prominent sex differences exist in oxidative stress, as females have overall lower levels of ROS-induced damage and higher antioxidant enzymes (24, 41, 112, 113). Sex differences have also been observed in one of the main oxidative stress signaling pathways involving interactions between NOX and angiotensin II (114, 115).
Common Oxidative Stress Pathways
NADPH oxidase (NOX) is an enzyme complex that catalyzes electron transfer across the plasma membrane from the substrate, NADPH, to oxygen, thus generating superoxide radicals (116, 117). NOX serves as a prominent source of ROS in the central nervous system and its isotypes are widely distributed across brain, especially in key structures involved in learning and memory (118, 119). Studies have revealed sex differences in NOX in vitro (120, 121) and in vivo (122, 123), with males having overall higher NOX levels. Van Kempen et al discovered that female mice with experimentally induced “postmenopause” displayed marked differences in the distribution of the cytoplasmic and plasmalemmal NOX p47phox subunit in hypothalamic neurons compared with males and control females (122). Protein expression of Nox1 and Nox2 has been observed to be higher in males whereas Nox4 was higher in females (121). We previously discovered that NOX signaling can be modulated by androgens (25), suggesting that NOX-induced oxidative stress may be a potential mechanism in sex differences observed in neurodegenerative diseases.
Angiotensin II (ANG II) is the main effector peptide of the central renin angiotensin system, and its effects are mediated by angiotensin type I and type II type receptors (A1TR; A2TR). The primary oxidative stress mediated effects of ANG II are via A1TRs. Activation of AT1R turns on a redox-dependent pathway that stimulates NOX, leading to increased ROS generation. Therefore, a feed forward stimulation of NOX and ANG II/A1TR signaling exists in which increased NOX-derived ROS can regulate A1TRs (114, 124, 125). Estrogen has a protective role by reducing A1TR expression and ANG II-induced ROS production (126-128). Dean et al discovered that upon reducing estrogen levels via ovariectomy in female rats, central AT1R expression increased and the effects were reversed by estrogen treatment (126). Interestingly, androgens increased ANG II activation (129, 130). Similarly, we observed androgens increased ANG II release in the hippocampus and substantia nigra while estrogens decreased ANG II release in the hippocampus using sniffer cells (CHO cells that express A1TR and fluoresce in response to ANG II) placed on the surface of a brain slice (Figs. 2 and 3). Interestingly, androgens increased ANG II release via the membrane androgen receptor (mAR), as evidenced by the ANG II release in response to the cell-impermeable androgen, dihydrotestosterone bound to bovine serum albumin (BSA).
Figure 2.
Angiotensin-sensitive sniffer cells placed on the substantia nigra (A) demonstrate increased fluorescence intensity in response to bath application of DHT-BSA to activate mAR in brain slices from male rats. DHT-BSA evoked an 8% increase in fluorescence intensity in AT1R-expressing sniffer cells while direct activation of sniffer cells with exogenous ANG II application produced a 20% increase in fluorescence intensity, suggesting mAR induced ANG II release in the substantia nigra of male rats (B). Sniffer cells did not respond to bath application of vehicle (C) but showed an increase in fluorescence intensity during bath application of 100 nM DHT-BSA (D). Each cell is represented by a different line color. ** = P < 0.01, paired t test. N = 6.
Figure 3.
Representative examples of spontaneous sniffer cell activity in response to bath application of (A) 100 nM DHT-BSA (mAR ligand) or (C) 100 nM 17β-estradiol (estrogen receptor ligand) in brain slice from a female (XX) rat. (B) Bath perfusion of DHT-BSA is associated with increased spontaneous AT1R sniffer cell activity in the hippocampal CA1 region while (D) bath perfusion of 17β-estradiol is associated with decreased spontaneous sniffer cell activity. Each cell is represented by a different line color. * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01 paired t test. N = 10.
Aging has long since been associated with increased oxidative damage, and the oxidative stress theory of aging (131) posits that age-associated functional loss is based on accumulation of oxidative damage to macromolecules (132). Multiple studies indicate that sex hormones can have both neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects (20, 23, 25, 48, 133). Possible mechanisms for sex hormone neuroprotection include anti-oxidative stress properties (134) and oxidative stress preconditioning (23). However, these protective effects of sex hormones appear to be dependent on the status of the cell. Indeed, this phenomenon has been described by Dr. Roberta Brinton as the “healthy cell bias of estrogen,” in which estrogens are protective in cells that are healthy but are damaging in unhealthy cells (135). Our studies extend Dr. Brinton’s seminal work by showing that androgens are also protective in healthy cells but damaging in unhealthy cells (23, 25), especially in cells that have an elevated oxidative stress load. Our research found that an estrogen receptor alpha/beta mechanism mediated the neuroprotective effects of estrogen and testosterone against subsequent oxidative stress insults. In contrast, the neurotoxic effects of androgens and estrogens are less well understood. We observed that a mAR (splice variant of the androgen receptor, AR45) mediated testosterone’s neurotoxic effects in an existing oxidative stress environment, but it is unknown what mechanism is mediating estrogen’s neurotoxic effects in an oxidative stress environment (23). Overall, sex hormones appear to be protective against subsequent oxidative stress insults but in cellular environment with existing oxidative stress they can induce neurotoxicity and increase the risk for neurodegeneration.
Sex Hormone Genomic and Nongenomic Cell Signaling
The exact nature of sex hormonal effects on cell viability is dependent on sex hormone receptors and their cellular signaling cascades. These cascades are activated through either genomic signaling (initiated by cytosolic nuclear hormone receptors that migrate to the nucleus to alter gene transcription) or through a nongenomic signaling (mediated by a membrane-bound hormone receptor). Intracellular nuclear receptors mediate genomic alteration of gene transcription by sex hormones, such as nuclear estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) (136-138) and the nuclear androgen receptor (AR) (139, 140) binding to their respective estrogen or androgen response elements.
Estrogens are generally associated with activating prosurvival pathways (141). These pathways include the brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) (142), which is involved in neuronal growth and synaptic plasticity (143), the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade (144), which mediates cellular differentiation and survival (145), and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) (137) activity and cAMP dependent signaling cascades (146). Androgen neuroprotective effects are mostly related to the estrogen-mediated mechanisms due to aromatization of testosterone into 17β-estradiol (141) or metabolism of DHT into 17β-diol (147). However, estrogen-independent mechanisms of androgen neuroprotection have been observed (148), in which androgens via the AR induce activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK), MAPK, and CREB pathways (149).
Nongenomic signaling of sex hormones can occur. Nongenomic steroid receptor–mediated signaling is understudied compared with genomic sex hormone signaling. Multiple membrane-bound estrogen receptors (mERs) have been identified within the brain within cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in the plasma membrane (150). These mERs include membrane-bound variants of the ERα and ERβ receptors, GPR30 (G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1; GPER1), and Gq-mER (151). ERα, ERβ, and GPER1 are involved in synaptic formation and function in the hippocampus and cortex through multiple signaling cascades, such as the BDNF pathway (152), caspase 3/7 (153), cAMP, MAPK, PI3 kinase, and protein kinase C pathways (154). In contrast to multiple membrane-associated estrogen receptors in the brain, studies examining the presence and function of mARs within the brain are limited. Recently, Thomas et al summarized 3 mARs of interest which have been observed in the brain: ZIP9, TRPM8, and GPRC6A (155). ZIP9 has been identified in a mouse hippocampal cell line and can induce ERK/MAPK signaling associated synaptic plasticity (156). TRPM8 receptor was found to be localized in lipid rafts (157) and acts as a neuronal somatosensory receptor (158, 159). However, the function of testosterone at TRPM8 receptor is relatively unknown and has only been investigated in the past decade (160, 161), with evidence that there are multiple testosterone-related behaviors affected through this receptor (161). Although GPRC6A was observed in the brain (162), the role of this mAR within the brain and the impact of testosterone is unknown. In addition to these 3 mARs, our laboratory has identified the presence of another mAR, an androgen receptor splice variant (ie, AR45) that is localized to lipid rafts in multiple brain regions (substantia nigra, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex) (163). The function of AR45 is linked with oxidative stress generation (23, 163). These effects are mediated via both the NOX and inositol triphosphate receptor–dependent intracellular calcium (Ca2+) activation (25). In addition, to mAR mediating activation of NOX, mAR is also involved in ANG II release (Figs. 2 and 3) that can further activate NOX oxidative stress signaling to result in a feed forward oxidative stress response.
Possible Therapeutic Strategies for Neurodegeneration
Currently, no therapeutic drugs are available for neurodegenerative diseases. Only palliative treatments to address symptoms of the diseases are available. Since sex differences are observed in many neurodegenerative diseases, potential therapeutics could decrease the progression of these diseases by focusing on sex hormone mediated oxidative stress pathways.
Sex hormone modulators, such as agonists and antagonists at the receptor level, can be used to amplify or inhibit sex hormone signaling. Common androgen receptor and estrogen receptor modulators act at genomic nuclear receptors. There are few selective membrane estrogen receptor (G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER) antagonists, such as G15, G36, CIMBA, PBX1, PBX2, and C4PY (164-168). Of these GPER antagonists, only G15 and its derivative G36 have shown efficacy in blocking GPER actions within the brain (169, 170). Similarly, there is only one mAR antagonist, novel small molecule peptidomimetic (D2). D2 has shown efficacy in blocking mAR actions in prostate cancer cells (171), but D2’s impact on mAR within the brain is unknown. In addition, an androgen receptor degrader, ASC-J9, can block genomic and nongenomic signaling by degrading membrane-associated and nuclear androgen receptors that are located within the brain and the periphery (23, 25, 172).
Issues have been noted with estrogen receptor antagonists, in which their actions (agonist or antagonist effects) are region dependent. A common estrogen receptor antagonist, ICI 182 780, acts at ERα/β but in certain tissues it affects the ERα and in other regions it affects ERβ (173, 174). Although ICI 182 780 generally acts as an estrogen receptor antagonist, it can act as an agonist on GPER (175), and thus ICI 182 780 has both antagonistic and agonistic properties. Similar issues have been noted with other ER antagonists, such as tamoxifen and clomiphene, which function differently based on tissue type (173, 174, 176, 177). Thus, the use of sex hormone receptor antagonists may not be beneficial as a therapeutic for neurodegenerative disorders, as these antagonists can have a lack of specificity depending on cell type.
Preclinical and clinical studies overwhelmingly show that males exhibit higher oxidative stress than females (25, 40, 178, 179). However, this does not necessarily mean that males are more vulnerable to neurodegenerative conditions. In fact, the increase in ROS in males, which is closely intertwined with androgens, can lead to preconditioning and eventually, neuroprotection. The prevailing level of oxidative stress determines if androgens will offer neuroprotection or escalate neurodegeneration with higher levels of oxidative stress being worsened by androgens. Since androgens can activate NOX and ANG II/A1TR pro-oxidative stress signaling (114, 124, 125), this pathway may be a potential target for neurodegenerative disease therapeutics.
Increased levels of AT1R and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), the enzyme involved in ANG II activation, have been reported in postmortem AD brain tissue (180). Thus, some researchers have asked the natural question of whether inhibition of ANG II would lead to improvement of AD. A meta-analysis showed that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) had significant benefits compared with placebo on overall cognition and were more effective than antihypertensives (eg, beta-blockers) (181). Another trial found an inverse association between patients placed on ARBs and various dementias (182). Interestingly, different outcomes have been observed in other studies (183-185). Similar to ARBs, inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme have been promising in preclinical trials (186) but have equivocal results in clinical trials. While some studies have reported decreased AD symptoms via inhibition of ANG II (181), others have reported otherwise (30, 183, 184). What is remiss in these trials, which could have contributed to the diverse results, is the failure to evaluate the effects of sex on ANG signaling, and by extension, inhibition.
Sex hormone receptors (eg, mAR) and AT1R can reside within cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in the plasma membrane of cells (25, 150, 163, 187-190). Interestingly, the mAR complexes with NOX in lipid rafts (25), and ANG II can impact NOX trafficking into and out of lipid rafts (191). Therefore, it may be possible to use cholesterol inhibitors, such as statins (192), to decrease both mAR and ANG II mediated oxidative stress and risk for neurodegenerative diseases. Indeed, studies have shown that statins can suppress the production of ROS (193). Although it is unclear what role cholesterol inhibition via statins may have on neurodegenerative disease risk (193-195), some studies have found that lowering cholesterol levels may be beneficial for dementia in aged patients (196) and may decrease AD risk and cognitive impairment (53, 197). Although it remains unclear what role sex plays on the ability of statins to decrease cholesterol (198-201), statins may play possible therapeutic roles in targeting membrane-associated sex hormone receptors and ANG II receptors that can increase oxidative stress generation and increase the risk for neurodegeneration.
Summary
Oxidative stress is a key mediator of neurodegenerative diseases and sex hormone cellular signaling, in which estrogens can decrease oxidative stress and androgens can increase oxidative stress via common signaling cascades (NOX-AT1R). The understudied mAR appears to play a role in NOX-AT1R activation through its effects at both NOX and AT1R, which could make this pathway a viable therapeutic target to slow the progression of oxidative stress–associated neurodegenerative diseases (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.
The membrane androgen receptor (mAR) can increase oxidative stress generation by multiple routes, such as binding to mAR to induce NADPH oxidase (NOX) induced oxidative stress. Also, the mAR can induce the release of ANG II that can bind the AT1R that can increase NOX-induced oxidative stress. The mAR, NOX, and AT1R are present within plasma membrane lipid raft signaling hubs. These lipid raft signaling hubs can further strengthen signaling, resulting in increased oxidative stress generation.
Acknowledgments
Financial Support: National Institutes of Health R01 NS0091359 (to R.L.C.); and NIH/NIA T32 AG020494 (to N.S.).
Glossary
Abbreviations
- αS
α-synuclein
- Aβ
Amyloid β
- A1TR
angiotensin type I receptor
- A2TR
angiotensin type II receptor
- AD
Alzheimer disease
- ALS
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- ANG II
angiotensin II
- BDNF
brain-derived neurotrophic factor
- BSA
bovine serum albumin
- cAMP
cyclic adenosine monophosphate
- CREB
cAMP-response element-binding-protein
- DHT
dihydrotestosterone
- ERα (or β)
estrogen receptor α (or β)
- ERK
extracellular regulated protein kinase
- GPER
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- mAR
membrane androgen receptor
- mER
membrane-bound estrogen receptor
- MS
multiple sclerosis
- NOX
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-phosphate (NADPH) oxidase
- PD
Parkinson disease
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
Additional Information
Disclosures : The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
- 1. Barnham KJ, Masters CL, Bush AI. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(3):205-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ohl K, Tenbrock K, Kipp M. Oxidative stress in multiple sclerosis: central and peripheral mode of action. Exp Neurol. 2016;277:58-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(3):391-460. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dennison JL, Ricciardi NR, Lohse I, Volmar CH, Wahlestedt C. Sexual dimorphism in the 3xTg-AD mouse model and its impact on pre-clinical research. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):41-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li R, Singh M. Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(3):385-403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pike CJ. Sex and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1-2):671-680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:53-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993;261(5123):921-923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Serrano-Pozo A, Das S, Hyman BT. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(1):68-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Safieh M, Korczyn AD, Michaelson DM. ApoE4: an emerging therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, et al. Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA. 1997;278(16):1349-1356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Riedel BC, Thompson PM, Brinton RD. Age, APOE and sex: triad of risk of Alzheimer’s disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;160:134-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dumitrescu L, Barnes LL, Thambisetty M, et al. ; Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Sex differences in the genetic predictors of Alzheimer’s pathology. Brain. 2019;142(9):2581-2589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. de Chaves EP, Narayanaswami V. Apolipoprotein E and cholesterol in aging and disease in the brain. Future Lipidol. 2008;3(5):505-530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Oveisgharan S, Arvanitakis Z, Yu L, Farfel J, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(6):887-900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rosario ER, Chang L, Head EH, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(4):604-613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Resnick SM, Matsumoto AM, Stephens-Shields AJ, et al. Testosterone treatment and cognitive function in older men with low testosterone and age-associated memory impairment. JAMA. 2017;317(7):717-727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Holmes S, Abbassi B, Su C, Singh M, Cunningham RL. Oxidative stress defines the neuroprotective or neurotoxic properties of androgens in immortalized female rat dopaminergic neuronal cells. Endocrinology. 2013;154(11):4281-4292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Holmes S, Singh M, Su C, Cunningham RL. Effects of oxidative stress and testosterone on pro-inflammatory signaling in a female rat dopaminergic neuronal cell line. Endocrinology. 2016;157(7):2824-2835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Snyder B, Duong P, Trieu J, Cunningham RL. Androgens modulate chronic intermittent hypoxia effects on brain and behavior. Horm Behav. 2018;106:62-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Budoff MJ, Ellenberg SS, Lewis CE, et al. Testosterone treatment and coronary artery plaque volume in older men with low testosterone. JAMA. 2017;317(7):708-716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cunningham RL, Singh M, O’Bryant SE, Hall JR, Barber RC. Oxidative stress, testosterone, and cognition among Caucasian and Mexican-American men with and without Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):563-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Duong P, Tenkorang MAA, Trieu J, McCuiston C, Rybalchenko N, Cunningham RL. Neuroprotective and neurotoxic outcomes of androgens and estrogens in an oxidative stress environment. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tenkorang MA, Snyder B, Cunningham RL. Sex-related differences in oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Steroids. 2018;133:21-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tenkorang MAA, Duong P, Cunningham RL. NADPH oxidase mediates membrane androgen receptor-induced neurodegeneration. Endocrinology. 2019;160(4):947-963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Cerri S, Mus L, Blandini F. Parkinson’s disease in women and men: what’s the difference? J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9(3):501-515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Meoni S, Macerollo A, Moro E. Sex differences in movement disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(2):84-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ullah MF, Ahmad A, Bhat SH, Abu-Duhier FM, Barreto GE, Ashraf GM. Impact of sex differences and gender specificity on behavioral characteristics and pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;102:95-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Abraham DS, Gruber-Baldini AL, Magder LS, et al. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease presentation and progression. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;69:48-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nuber S, Nam AY, Rajsombath MM, et al. A stearoyl-coenzyme a desaturase inhibitor prevents multiple parkinson disease phenotypes in α-synuclein mice. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(1):74-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rajsombath MM, Nam AY, Ericsson M, Nuber S. Female sex and brain-selective estrogen benefit α-synuclein tetramerization and the PD-like motor syndrome in 3K transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2019;39(38):7628-7640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Labandeira-Garcia JL, Rodriguez-Perez AI, Valenzuela R, Costa-Besada MA, Guerra MJ. Menopause and Parkinson’s disease. Interaction between estrogens and brain renin-angiotensin system in dopaminergic degeneration. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2016;43:44-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Judd HL, Lucas WE, Yen SS. Effect of oophorectomy on circulating testosterone and androstenedione levels in patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;118(6):793-798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Judd HL, Judd GE, Lucas WE, Yen SS. Endocrine function of the postmenopausal ovary: concentration of androgens and estrogens in ovarian and peripheral vein blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;39(6):1020-1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Greenblatt RB, Colle ML, Mahesh VB. Ovarian and adrenal steroid production in the postmenopausal woman. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(4):383-387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lucisano A, Acampora MG, Russo N, Maniccia E, Montemurro A, Dell’Acqua S. Ovarian and peripheral plasma levels of progestogens, androgens and oestrogens in post-menopausal women. Maturitas. 1984;6(1):45-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nagamani M, Hannigan EV, Dillard EA Jr, Van Dinh T. Ovarian steroid secretion in postmenopausal women with and without endometrial cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62(3):508-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sluijmer AV, Heineman MJ, De Jong FH, Evers JL. Endocrine activity of the postmenopausal ovary: the effects of pituitary down-regulation and oophorectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(7):2163-2167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fogle RH, Stanczyk FZ, Zhang X, Paulson RJ. Ovarian androgen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):3040-3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Dantas AP, Franco Mdo C, Silva-Antonialli MM, et al. Gender differences in superoxide generation in microvessels of hypertensive rats: role of NAD(P)H-oxidase. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(1):22-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kander MC, Cui Y, Liu Z. Gender difference in oxidative stress: a new look at the mechanisms for cardiovascular diseases. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(5):1024-1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pape JA, Grose JH. The effects of diet and sex in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2020;176(5):301-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Philips T, Rothstein JD. Rodent models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2015;69:5.67.1-5.67.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Pegoraro V, Merico A, Angelini C. Micro-RNAs in ALS muscle: differences in gender, age at onset and disease duration. J Neurol Sci. 2017;380:58-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Martineau É, Di Polo A, Vande Velde C, Robitaille R. Sex-specific differences in motor-unit remodeling in a mouse model of ALS. eNeuro. 2020;7(1). doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0388-19.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Golden LC, Voskuhl R. The importance of studying sex differences in disease: the example of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1-2):633-643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Nicks KM, Fowler TW, Gaddy D. Reproductive hormones and bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010;8(2):60-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Moreau KL. Modulatory influence of sex hormones on vascular aging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;316(3):H522-H526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Vadakkadath Meethal S, Atwood CS. The role of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal hormones in the normal structure and functioning of the brain. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62(3):257-270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ahmed NY, Knowles R, Dehorter N. New insights into cholinergic neuron diversity. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW. Basal forebrain cholinergic circuits and signaling in cognition and cognitive decline. Neuron. 2016;91(6):1199-1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Yamanaka K, Hori Y, Minamimoto T, et al. Roles of centromedian parafascicular nuclei of thalamus and cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal striatum in associative learning of environmental events. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018;125(3):501-513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Gaykema RP, Goehler LE. Ascending caudal medullary catecholamine pathways drive sickness-induced deficits in exploratory behavior: brain substrates for fatigue? Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25(3):443-460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bloom FE, Schulman JA, Koob GF. Catecholamines and behavior. In: Trendelenburg U, Weiner N, eds. Catecholamines II. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1989:27-88. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sambyal K, Singh RV. Production aspects of testosterone by microbial biotransformation and future prospects. Steroids. 2020;159:108651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wallach EE, Shoham Z, Schachter M. Estrogen biosynthesis—regulation, action, remote effects, and value of monitoring in ovarian stimulation cycles. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(4):687-701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Santoro N, Randolph JF Jr. Reproductive hormones and the menopause transition. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38(3):455-466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Data from: PubChem compound summary for CID 6013, Testosterone. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2021. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/6013 [Google Scholar]
- 59. Testosterone-what it does and doesn’t do. Harvard Health Publishing. Basic Information About Testosterone. Harvard Medical School; 2019. Accessed September 15, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Decaroli MC, Rochira V. Aging and sex hormones in males. Virulence. 2017;8(5):545-570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Auyeung B, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition. Pflugers Arch. 2013;465(5):557-571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Beck-Peccoz P, Padmanabhan V, Baggiani AM, et al. Maturation of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function in normal human fetuses: circulating levels of gonadotropins, their common alpha-subunit and free testosterone, and discrepancy between immunological and biological activities of circulating follicle-stimulating hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(3):525-532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Schulz KM, Molenda-Figueira HA, Sisk CL. Back to the future: the organizational-activational hypothesis adapted to puberty and adolescence. Horm Behav. 2009;55(5):597-604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wyss-Coray T. Ageing, neurodegeneration and brain rejuvenation. Nature. 2016;539(7628):180-186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, et al. Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):589-598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM 3rd, et al. Longitudinal changes in testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone in healthy older men. Metabolism. 1997;46(4):410-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Janicki SC, Schupf N. Hormonal influences on cognition and risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010;10(5):359-366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Boers GH, Smals AG, Trijbels FJ, Leermakers AI, Kloppenborg PW. Unique efficiency of methionine metabolism in premenopausal women may protect against vascular disease in the reproductive years. J Clin Invest. 1983;72(6):1971-1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Brattström LE, Hultberg BL, Hardebo JE. Folic acid responsive postmenopausal homocysteinemia. Metabolism. 1985;34(11):1073-1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Wouters MG, Moorrees MT, van der Mooren MJ, et al. Plasma homocysteine and menopausal status. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995;25(11):801-805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Chillemi R, Simpore J, Persichilli S, Minucci A, D’Agata A, Musumeci S. Elevated levels of plasma homocysteine in postmenopausal women in Burkina Faso. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(7):765-771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kang SS, Wong PW, Cook HY, Norusis M, Messer JV. Protein-bound homocyst(e)ine. A possible risk factor for coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 1986;77(5):1482-1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Christensen A, Pike CJ. Menopause, obesity and inflammation: interactive risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ala-Fossi SL, Mäenpää J, Aine R, Punnonen R. Ovarian testosterone secretion during perimenopause. Maturitas. 1998;29(3):239-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Horstman AM, Dillon EL, Urban RJ, Sheffield-Moore M. The role of androgens and estrogens on healthy aging and longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(11):1140-1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Schurz H, Salie M, Tromp G, Hoal EG, Kinnear CJ, Möller M. The X chromosome and sex-specific effects in infectious disease susceptibility. Hum Genomics. 2019;13(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Barford A, Dorling D, Davey Smith G, Shaw M. Life expectancy: women now on top everywhere. BMJ. 2006;332(7545):808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(7):596-603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Barrett EL, Richardson DS. Sex differences in telomeres and lifespan. Aging Cell. 2011;10(6):913-921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Davis EJ, Lobach I, Dubal DB. Female XX sex chromosomes increase survival and extend lifespan in aging mice. Aging Cell. 2019;18(1):e12871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Dewing P, Shi T, Horvath S, Vilain E. Sexually dimorphic gene expression in mouse brain precedes gonadal differentiation. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;118(1-2):82-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Liebsch G, Wotjak CT, Landgraf R, Engelmann M. Septal vasopressin modulates anxiety-related behaviour in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1996;217(2-3):101-104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Arnold AP. Four core genotypes and XY* mouse models: update on impact on SABV research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;119:1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Arnold AP, Chen X. What does the “four core genotypes” mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues? Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30(1):1-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ji H, Zheng W, Wu X, et al. Sex chromosome effects unmasked in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 2010;55(5):1275-1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Dewing P, Chiang CW, Sinchak K, et al. Direct regulation of adult brain function by the male-specific factor SRY. Curr Biol. 2006;16(4):415-420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Piton A, Gauthier J, Hamdan FF, et al. Systematic resequencing of X-chromosome synaptic genes in autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(8):867-880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Skuse DH. Imprinting, the X-chromosome, and the male brain: explaining sex differences in the liability to autism. Pediatr Res. 2000;47(1):9-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Russell HF, Wallis D, Mazzocco MM, et al. Increased prevalence of ADHD in Turner syndrome with no evidence of imprinting effects. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31(9):945-955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Tartaglia NR, Ayari N, Hutaff-Lee C, Boada R. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children and adolescents with sex chromosome aneuploidy: XXY, XXX, XYY, and XXYY. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012;33(4):309-318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. van Rijn S, Swaab H. Executive dysfunction and the relation with behavioral problems in children with 47,XXY and 47,XXX. Genes Brain Behav. 2015;14(2):200-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, Kolotii AD, Iourov IY. X chromosome aneuploidy in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Carvalho V, Ferreira JJ, Correia Guedes L. Tremor and parkinsonism in chromosomopathies - a systematic review. Mov Disord. Published online ahead of print May 31, 2021. doi:10.1002/mds.28663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Lee J, Pinares-Garcia P, Loke H, Ham S, Vilain E, Harley VR. Sex-specific neuroprotection by inhibition of the Y-chromosome gene, SRY, in experimental Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(33):16577-16582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Loke H, Harley V, Lee J. Biological factors underlying sex differences in neurological disorders. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;65:139-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Clépet C, Schafer AJ, Sinclair AH, Palmer MS, Lovell-Badge R, Goodfellow PN. The human SRY transcript. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2(12):2007-2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Mayer A, Lahr G, Swaab DF, Pilgrim C, Reisert I. The Y-chromosomal genes SRY and ZFY are transcribed in adult human brain. Neurogenetics. 1998;1(4):281-288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Czech DP, Lee J, Sim H, Parish CL, Vilain E, Harley VR. The human testis-determining factor SRY localizes in midbrain dopamine neurons and regulates multiple components of catecholamine synthesis and metabolism. J Neurochem. 2012;122(2):260-271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Rosenfeld CS. Brain sexual differentiation and requirement of SRY: why or why not? Front Neurosci. 2017;11:632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Le Guen Y, Napolioni V, Belloy ME, et al. Common X-chromosome variants are associated with parkinson disease risk. Ann Neurol. 2021;90(1):22-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Stone JF, Sandberg AA. Sex chromosome aneuploidy and aging. Mutat Res. 1995;338(1-6):107-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Guttenbach M, Koschorz B, Bernthaler U, Grimm T, Schmid M. Sex chromosome loss and aging: in situ hybridization studies on human interphase nuclei. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57(5):1143-1150. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Sinclair EJ, Potter AM, Watmore AE, Fitchett M, Ross F. Trisomy 15 associated with loss of the Y chromosome in bone marrow: a possible new aging effect. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998;105(1):20-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Sauer H, Wartenberg M, Hescheler J. Reactive oxygen species as intracellular messengers during cell growth and differentiation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2001;11(4):173-186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Zhang J, Wang X, Vikash V, et al. ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:4350965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Pizzino G, Irrera N, Cucinotta M, et al. Oxidative stress: harms and benefits for human health. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:8416763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Cadet J, Davies KJA. Oxidative DNA damage & repair: an introduction. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;107:2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Cai Z, Yan LJ. Protein oxidative modifications: beneficial roles in disease and health. J Biochem Pharmacol Res. 2013;1(1):15-26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Ayala A, Muñoz MF, Argüelles S. Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:360438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wang X, Michaelis EK. Selective neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress in the brain. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010;2:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Singh A, Kukreti R, Saso L, Kukreti S. Oxidative stress: a key modulator in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2019;24(8):1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Ehrenbrink G, Hakenhaar FS, Salomon TB, Petrucci AP, Sandri MR, Benfato MS. Antioxidant enzymes activities and protein damage in rat brain of both sexes. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41(4):368-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Ruszkiewicz JA, Miranda-Vizuete A, Tinkov AA, et al. Sex-specific differences in redox homeostasis in brain norm and disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2019;67(2):312-342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Nguyen Dinh Cat A, Montezano AC, Burger D, Touyz RM. Angiotensin II, NADPH oxidase, and redox signaling in the vasculature. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19(10):1110-1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. De Silva TM, Faraci FM. Effects of angiotensin II on the cerebral circulation: role of oxidative stress. Front Physiol. 2012;3:484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Tarafdar A, Pula G. The role of NADPH oxidases and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):3824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(1):245-313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Infanger DW, Sharma RV, Davisson RL. NADPH oxidases of the brain: distribution, regulation, and function. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8(9-10):1583-1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ma MW, Wang J, Zhang Q, et al. NADPH oxidase in brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Stepniak J, Lewinski A, Karbownik-Lewinska M. Sexual dimorphism of NADPH oxidase/H2O2 system in rat thyroid cells; effect of exogenous 17β-estradiol. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):4063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Wong PS, Randall MD, Roberts RE. Sex differences in the role of NADPH oxidases in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in porcine isolated coronary arteries. Vascul Pharmacol. 2015;72:83-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Van Kempen TA, Narayan A, Waters EM, et al. Alterations in the subcellular distribution of NADPH oxidase p47(phox) in hypothalamic paraventricular neurons following slow-pressor angiotensin II hypertension in female mice with accelerated ovarian failure. J Comp Neurol. 2016;524(11):2251-2265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Patik JC, Curtis BM, Nasirian A, Vranish JR, Fadel PJ, Brothers RM. Sex differences in the mechanisms mediating blunted cutaneous microvascular function in young black men and women. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(4):H1063-H1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Jackson L, Eldahshan W, Fagan SC, Ergul A. Within the brain: the renin angiotensin system. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Dikalov SI, Nazarewicz RR. Angiotensin II-induced production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: potential mechanisms and relevance for cardiovascular disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19(10):1085-1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Dean SA, Tan J, O’Brien ER, Leenen FH. 17beta-estradiol downregulates tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme and ANG II type 1 receptor in female rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;288(3):R759-R766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Nickenig G, Bäumer AT, Grohè C, et al. Estrogen modulates AT1 receptor gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 1998;97(22):2197-2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Xue Q, Xiao D, Zhang L. Estrogen regulates angiotensin II receptor expression patterns and protects the heart from ischemic injury in female rats. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Mishra JS, More AS, Gopalakrishnan K, Kumar S. Testosterone plays a permissive role in angiotensin II-induced hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in male rats. Biol Reprod. 2019;100(1):139-148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Song J, Kost CK Jr, Martin DS. Androgens potentiate renal vascular responses to angiotensin II via amplification of the Rho kinase signaling pathway. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;72(3):456-463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Harman D. Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol. 1956;11(3):298-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Liguori I, Russo G, Curcio F, et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:757-772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Borrás C, Gambini J, López-Grueso R, Pallardó FV, Viña J. Direct antioxidant and protective effect of estradiol on isolated mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802(1):205-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Moosmann B, Behl C. The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(16):8867-8872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Brinton RD. The healthy cell bias of estrogen action: mitochondrial bioenergetics and neurological implications. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31(10):529-537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Vrtačnik P, Ostanek B, Mencej-Bedrač S, Marc J. The many faces of estrogen signaling. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(3):329-342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Fuentes N, Silveyra P. Estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019;116:135-170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Liu M, Kelley MH, Herson PS, Hurn PD. Neuroprotection of sex steroids. Minerva Endocrinol. 2010;35(2):127-143. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Davey RA, Grossmann M. Androgen receptor structure, function and biology: from bench to bedside. Clin Biochem Rev. 2016;37(1):3-15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Lu NZ, Wardell SE, Burnstein KL, et al. International union of pharmacology. LXV. The pharmacology and classification of the nuclear receptor superfamily: glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, progesterone, and androgen receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58(4):782-797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Simpkins JW, Singh M, Brock C, Etgen AM. Neuroprotection and estrogen receptors. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;96(2):119-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Scharfman HE, MacLusky NJ. Estrogen and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in hippocampus: complexity of steroid hormone-growth factor interactions in the adult CNS. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2006;27(4):415-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Konishi K, Cherkerzian S, Aroner S, et al. Impact of BDNF and sex on maintaining intact memory function in early midlife. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;88:137-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Bustamante-Barrientos FA, Méndez-Ruette M, Ortloff A, et al. The impact of estrogen and estrogen-like molecules in neurogenesis and neurodegeneration: beneficial or harmful? Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:636176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75(1):50-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Zhang F, Zhang L, Qi Y, Xu H. Mitochondrial cAMP signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(24):4577-4590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Handa RJ, Pak TR, Kudwa AE, Lund TD, Hinds L. An alternate pathway for androgen regulation of brain function: activation of estrogen receptor beta by the metabolite of dihydrotestosterone, 5alpha-androstane-3beta,17beta-diol. Horm Behav. 2008;53(5):741-752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Nguyen TV, Jayaraman A, Quaglino A, Pike CJ. Androgens selectively protect against apoptosis in hippocampal neurones. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010;22(9):1013-1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Pike CJ, Nguyen TV, Ramsden M, Yao M, Murphy MP, Rosario ER. Androgen cell signaling pathways involved in neuroprotective actions. Horm Behav. 2008;53(5):693-705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Marin R, Diaz M. Estrogen interactions with lipid rafts related to neuroprotection. impact of brain ageing and menopause. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Micevych PE, Kelly MJ. Membrane estrogen receptor regulation of hypothalamic function. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;96(2):103-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Hara Y, Waters EM, McEwen BS, Morrison JH. Estrogen effects on cognitive and synaptic health over the lifecourse. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):785-807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Roque C, Mendes-Oliveira J, Baltazar G. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor activates cell type-specific signaling pathways in cortical cultures: relevance to the selective loss of astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2019;149(1):27-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Smith AW, Rønnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Gq-mER signaling has opposite effects on hypothalamic orexigenic and anorexigenic neurons. Steroids. 2014;81:31-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Thomas P. Membrane androgen receptors unrelated to nuclear steroid receptors. Endocrinology. 2019;160(4):772-781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Zhang Y, Li S, Chen H, et al. Non-genomic mechanisms mediate androgen-induced PSD95 expression. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(8):2281-2294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Morenilla-Palao C, Pertusa M, Meseguer V, Cabedo H, Viana F. Lipid raft segregation modulates TRPM8 channel activity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(14):9215-9224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Ordás P, Hernández-Ortego P, Vara H, et al. Expression of the cold thermoreceptor TRPM8 in rodent brain thermoregulatory circuits. J Comp Neurol. 2021;529(1):234-256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Beukema P, Cecil KL, Peterson E, et al. TrpM8-mediated somatosensation in mouse neocortex. J Comp Neurol. 2018;526(9):1444-1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Asuthkar S, Elustondo PA, Demirkhanyan L, et al. The TRPM8 protein is a testosterone receptor: I. Biochemical evidence for direct TRPM8-testosterone interactions. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(5):2659-2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Mohandass A, Krishnan V, Gribkova ED, et al. TRPM8 as the rapid testosterone signaling receptor: implications in the regulation of dimorphic sexual and social behaviors. Faseb J. 2020;34(8):10887-10906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Luo J, Liu Z, Liu J, Eugene CY. Distribution pattern of GPRC6A mRNA in mouse tissue by in situ hybridization. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010;35(1):1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Garza-Contreras J, Duong P, Snyder BD, Schreihofer DA, Cunningham RL. Presence of androgen receptor variant in neuronal lipid rafts. eNeuro. 2017;4(4):ENEURO.0109-17.2017. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0109-17.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Xu S, Yu S, Dong D, Lee LTO. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor: a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10(725). doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Rouhimoghadam M, Lu AS, Salem AK, Filardo EJ. Therapeutic perspectives on the modulation of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:591217. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.591217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Luo J, Liu D. Does GPER really function as a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in vivo? Front Endocrinol. 2020;11(148). doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Maggiolini M, Santolla MF, Avino S, et al. Identification of two benzopyrroloxazines acting as selective GPER antagonists in breast cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Future Med Chem. 2015;7(4):437-448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Lappano R, Rosano C, Pisano A, et al. A calixpyrrole derivative acts as an antagonist to GPER, a G-protein coupled receptor: mechanisms and models. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(10):1237-1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Xing FZ, Zhao YG, Zhang YY, et al. Nuclear and membrane estrogen receptor antagonists induce similar mTORC2 activation-reversible changes in synaptic protein expression and actin polymerization in the mouse hippocampus. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24(6):495-507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Bai N, Zhang Q, Zhang W, et al. G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor activation upregulates interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the hippocampus after global cerebral ischemia: implications for neuronal self-defense. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Ravindranathan P, Lee TK, Yang L, et al. Peptidomimetic targeting of critical androgen receptor-coregulator interactions in prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Yang Z, Chang YJ, Yu IC, et al. ASC-J9 ameliorates spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy phenotype via degradation of androgen receptor. Nat Med. 2007;13(3):348-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Jia M, Dahlman-Wright K, Gustafsson JÅ. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta in health and disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;29(4):557-568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Notch EG, Mayer GD. Efficacy of pharmacological estrogen receptor antagonists in blocking activation of zebrafish estrogen receptors. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;173(1):183-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Hsu LH, Chu NM, Lin YA-O, Kao SA-O. G-protein coupled estrogen receptor in breast cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(2):306. doi:10.3390/ijms20020306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 176. Klein DJ, Thorn CF, Desta Z, Flockhart DA, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: tamoxifen pathway, pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013;23(11):643–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Rao US, Fine RL, Scarborough GA. Antiestrogens and steroid hormones: substrates of the human P-glycoprotein. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;48(2):287–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Rytz CL, Pialoux V, Mura M, et al. Impact of aerobic exercise, sex, and metabolic syndrome on markers of oxidative stress: results from the Brain in Motion study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;128(4):748-756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Jung O, Schreiber JG, Geiger H, Pedrazzini T, Busse R, Brandes RP. gp91phox-containing NADPH oxidase mediates endothelial dysfunction in renovascular hypertension. Circulation. 2004;109(14):1795-1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Savaskan E, Hock C, Olivieri G, et al. Cortical alterations of angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II and AT1 receptor in Alzheimer’s dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22(4):541-546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Levi Marpillat N, Macquin-Mavier I, Tropeano AI, Bachoud-Levi AC, Maison P. Antihypertensive classes, cognitive decline and incidence of dementia: a network meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31(6):1073-1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Davies NM, Kehoe PG, Ben-Shlomo Y, Martin RM. Associations of anti-hypertensive treatments with Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and other dementias. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(4):699-708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Hsu CY, Huang CC, Chan WL, et al. Angiotensin-receptor blockers and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in hypertension population–a nationwide cohort study. Circ J. 2013;77(2):405-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Sink KM, Leng X, Williamson J, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and cognitive decline in older adults with hypertension: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1195-1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Zhuang S, Wang HF, Wang X, Li J, Xing CM. The association of renin-angiotensin system blockade use with the risks of cognitive impairment of aging and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;33:32-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Royea J, Hamel E. Brain angiotensin II and angiotensin IV receptors as potential Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic targets. Geroscience. 2020;42(5):1237-1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Balla A, Tóth DJ, Soltész-Katona E, et al. Mapping of the localization of type 1 angiotensin receptor in membrane microdomains using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based sensors. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(12):9090-9099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Adebiyi A, Soni H, John TA, Yang F. Lipid rafts are required for signal transduction by angiotensin II receptor type 1 in neonatal glomerular mesangial cells. Exp Cell Res. 2014;324(1):92-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Ushio-Fukai M, Alexander RW. Caveolin-dependent angiotensin II type 1 receptor signaling in vascular smooth muscle. Hypertension. 2006;48(5):797-803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Wyse BD, Prior IA, Qian H, et al. Caveolin interacts with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor during exocytic transport but not at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(26):23738-23746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Anagnostopoulou A, Camargo LL, Rodrigues D, Montezano AC, Touyz RM. Importance of cholesterol-rich microdomains in the regulation of Nox isoforms and redox signaling in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Istvan E. Statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase: a 3-dimensional view. Atheroscler Suppl. 2003;4(1):3-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Poly TN, Islam MM, Walther BA, et al. Association between use of statin and risk of dementia: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(3):214-226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Zandi PP, Sparks DL, Khachaturian AS, et al. ; Cache County Study investigators. Do statins reduce risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer disease? The cache county study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(2):217-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Zhou B, Teramukai S, Fukushima M. Prevention and treatment of dementia or Alzheimer’s disease by statins: a meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;23(3):194-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Bitzur R. Remembering statins: do statins have adverse cognitive effects? Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 2:S253-S259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Schultz BG, Patten DK, Berlau DJ. The role of statins in both cognitive impairment and protection against dementia: a tale of two mechanisms. Transl Neurodegener. 2018;7:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Smiderle L, Lima LO, Hutz MH, et al. Evaluation of sexual dimorphism in the efficacy and safety of simvastatin/atorvastatin therapy in a southern Brazilian cohort. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(1):33-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Sanchez PAM, Ghaffarejad S, Thio MP, et al. Sex-differences in statin effects: long-term atorvastatin administration reduced LDL-cholesterol levels and body weights only in male mice, but decreased voluntary cage activity in male and female mice. FASEB J. 2020;34(S1):1-1. [Google Scholar]
- 200. Chen C-Y, Chuang S-Y, Fang C-C, et al. Gender difference in statin intervention on blood lipid control among patients with coronary heart disease. Int J Gerontol. 2013;7(2):116-121. [Google Scholar]
- 201. Pavanello C, Mombelli G. Considering gender in prescribing statins: what do physicians need to know? Clin Lipidol. 2015;10(6):499-512. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.